Preview

Foodmart, Inc. Learning Team Assignment Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1606 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Foodmart, Inc. Learning Team Assignment Paper
Foodmart, Inc.
Learning Team Assignment
LAW/421

Foodmart, Inc.
Part 1 In order to provide a detailed assessment of the above mentioned scenario, a clear understanding of each step in the contract must be clear. A contract was established between Foodmart and Masterpiece Construction for renovation to one of Foodmart’s stores. With a deadline approaching, and an increase in contract requests, Masterpiece was not able to complete expectations of this contract. To remedy the situation, Masterpiece delegated the job to another company- Build to Them to Fall Construction.
According to Melvin (2011) parties in a contract may delegate, or transfer contract duties to a third party. Masterpiece, also known as the delegator, is giving the contract responsibilities to Build, also known as the delegatee. It is important to note that in the case of delegation, the delegator (Masterpiece) is still liable to Foodmart, but is not obligated to share the change with the original party, in this
…show more content…
References
Cornell Law. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.lawcornel.edu
Cornell University Law School (2010). Legal Information Institute. Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/negligent
FindLaw (2013) Impracticability http://dictionary.findlaw.com/definition/impracticability.html#sthash.nKH7O4zu.dpuf Melvin, S. P. (2011). The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Nolo (n.d.) Stim,R. Who lacks the capacity to contract. Retrieved from http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/lack-capacity-to-contract-32647.html
Senior Magazine Online. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.seniormag.com/legal/oralcontracts.htm
The Law Handbook. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.lawhandbook.org.au/handbook/ch12s01s02.php
US Legal.com. (2013). Retrieved from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Defense Construction declared that it was just a clarification and accepted the bid. Analysis The appellant used the Ron Engineering, Supra case to conclude that there was a contracted formed between the owner and each of the tenderers. The contract was Contract A. Since there was a formal contract introduced, the breach by Sorochan Enterprises Ltd. for introducing a stipulation for their bid, in the form of an additional charge, and because Defense Construction accepted this non-compliant bid, the Contract A between the other tenderers was broken.…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Ralph Gough was under a preexisting duty to construct the trusses for the Kinney shoe store. The general contractor, Chuckrow, was never obligated to pay for the re-erection of those trusses no matter who’s fault if they fell according to the original agreement. Mr. Gough 's preexisting duty cannot operate as consideration or change Chuckrow 's offer to pay. Therefore the contract was not modified, and Chuckrow is obligated only for the original contract price. Hence Mr. Gough cannot recover the funds. (Robert Chuckrow Construction Company v. Gough, 1968)…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Their contract was to have their renovations completed within 6 months’ time. Grocery Inc. expects the service to be completed within 6 months and with the quality of work that Company A provides. When Company A contracted that work to Company B, they were not held up to the same standard, therefore Company A is not holding up their side of the contract. However, if Company A requested and communicated this to Grocery Inc. this would not have been a breach of contract. Company A is attempting to claim commercial impracticability. In order for commercial impracticability to apply something unexpected must have occurred for Company A not to be able to complete their services in the time provided by their contract (Cohen Seglias, 2014). This did not occur. Therefore, Company A did breach their contract to Grocery Inc. Company A would have negotiated with Grocery Inc. to have a third party work on some of the renovations there would have not been a breach of contract. However, since there was no negotiating that took place Grocery Inc. may discharge the contract because there was no mutual consent between both…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Issue: Did the statute of limitations begin to run when the defendant first suspected harm had resulted from the product or when her suspicions were validated by a medical…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case is an interesting one because it gets right into the core of the confliction between the proprieties of contractual agreement. This case is focused primarily on Osborne Development Corp. and the multiple defects customers are experiencing with their homes. These upset customers are suing this Corporation in attempts to collect reparations for the discrepancies faced. The homeowners who purchased homes form Osborne Development Corp. (ODC) negligently purchased these homes. According to the Home Buyers Warranty ( HBW), “ Any and all claims disputes and controversies by or between the Homeowner, the Builder, the Warrant Insure and/or HBW…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Scenario: Grocery Inc., Presentation Glenn Devillier, Cara Birritteri, Richardson Fong and Nilson Goncalves Introduction  Review Case Studies:  Grocery Inc. Uniform Commercial Code  Grocery Inc. Renovations  Grocery Inc. (Jeff)  Gap Filing Rule (Cereal Inc.)  Harry and Tom Breach of Contract  Grocery Inc.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This paperwork MGT 437 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Project Implementation, Control, and Termination Paper includes review of the following parts:…

    • 474 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    the type of solution (private, public, or hybrid cloud and / or all three (3).)…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this work MKT 421 Week 3 Learning Team Marketing Plan Phase II you can find solution of the following task:…

    • 448 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This pack contains STR 581 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment JC Penny Innovation Strategy Paper…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    week 2

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    5. Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CJA 374 Week 5 Learning Team Assignment Future of the Juvenile Justice System Presentation and Paper…

    • 421 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How do you think that you could effectively market that product? Who would be your target market or targeted consumer for the product? What avenues or media outlets would you consider for your marketing campaign?…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A contract is formed when two parties with the correct mental intent, under correct circumstances within the boundaries of the law, and with detriment to each of them agree to do certain acts in exchange for the other’s acts. (Jennings, 2006). Span Systems and Citizen Schwartz (C-S) have entered into a bilateral contract. C-S signed a contract for software development for a one year, and Span Systems will deliver software to their clients. A bilateral contract is one in which both parties promise to perform certain things (Jennings, 2006). Both parties are obligated to perform under the contract, however, but C-S and Span Systems have not performed according to the contract. C-S has demanded the transfer of all unfinished code and termination of the contract. The companies state that each other is in breach of contract. The legal issues identified are performance, change requirements, and communication and reporting.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    c. It is outstanding that we still managed the contract after the customer increased his demands, however our manager responded with better transitions.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics