Preview

Focus Groups

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
883 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Focus Groups
Focus Groups

Focus groups are one of many methods utilized by researchers to gather qualitative data. This method consists in simultaneously interviewing a group of people, usually 6-8, in the same location with a shared factor (Krueger& Casey, 2000). They are also a powerful tool to assess services or examine new ideas (Krueger& Casey, 2000; McNamara, n.d.). Focus groups are an ideal data gathering method for researchers because they allow them to learn the social norms of the community or subgroup being connected to the research (Krueger& Casey, 2000; Mack, Woodsong, MacQueen, Guest, & Namey, 2005). Due to the mix of individuals from diverse areas within the community, they also allow researchers to explore the different perspectives present within it (Krueger& Casey, 2000).

This kind of gathering method attempt to promote group opinion and is especially useful for research involving social behavioral assessments that will be utilized for the creation and determination of services targeted to meet the needs of an specific group or population (Krueger& Casey, 2000). The group is lead by a researcher acting like a moderator, which through the use of open ended questions leads the discussion (Mack, Woodsong, MacQueen, Guest, & Namey, 2005). Focus groups allow researchers to obtain valuable feedback or comments regarding the researched topic (Krueger& Casey, 2000). These groups are utilized by organizations for diverse purposed such as marketing, product or service improvement, evaluation, or for the creation of mission statements or strategic plans (Krueger& Casey, 2000). The use of focus groups as a data gathering method produces a significant amount of information over a short period of time (Mack et al., 2005). However, they are not the most suitable method to gather data regarding highly social and personal topics (Krueger& Casey, 2000; Mack et al., 2005).
Compiling Data

Focus groups usually gather data on diverse ways. Most times the facilitator



References: Stringer, E.T. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2000) Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K.M., Guest, G. & Namey, E. (2005). Focus Groups. Qualitative research methods: A data collector 's field guide, (pp. 51-82). Research Triangle Park, NC: Family Health International. Retrieved October 23, 2010from http://www.fhi.org/NR/rdonlyres/emgox4xpcoyrysqspsgy5ww6mq7v4e44etd6toiejyxalhbmk5sdnef7fqlr 3q6hlwa2ttj5524xbn/datacollectorguideenrh.pdf. McNamara, C (n.d.) Basics of Conducting Focus Groups. Retrieved October 23, 2010from http://www.mapnp.org/library/evaluatn/focusgrp.htm#anchor911239.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Problems, concerns, and issues that affect the residents of Anoka County’s overall health and well-being were discussed during these interviews. The last community involvement strategy was creating twenty-one focus groups, each group speaking on behalf of a smaller population within Anoka County. For example, a few of the focus groups consisted of parents, seniors, community representatives, religious community members, and school representatives. The key informant interviews and focus groups were effective in incorporating many issues and prioritizing the problems presented in the conversations, but the people involved seemed to primarily be professionals and people who already had a strong voice in the community. It would have been more beneficial to hear about issues and problems from random community members that are not super involved because they present new perspective and may face different problems than people of a professional status. Overall, Anoka County was successful at involving the community because their results were a representative sample of the population as a…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hsa 305 Week 4

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The problems with on-line focus groups are that the security of these sessions is not tight as with live sessions. The inability to view the respondent’s body language and the inability to quickly and effective show external stimuli in case studies.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Riet et al (2001) explains that qualitative research is needed to help create programs and systems that meet their aim and have a good insight into client needs. Quantitative research is important because it can be easily pre-structured, this means through surveys and forms many people can be reached in a short period of time (Brannen 2017). This research proposal will use qualitative research by creating focus groups in two different areas of Victoria, both in Geelong one with young people who have been involved in the program and the other with providers of the Circle Program in Geelong. The focus group involving young people who have previously been involved in the program will aim to find areas in which the program can improve by starting a discussion around a question such as ‘do you feel you received adequate support for your individual circumstances in the circle program’. When discussing focus groups Kreuger and Casey (2014) explain that the chance to explain who will benefit from the study, the chance to communicate with others and the chance to see both sides of any issue are important in improving…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MARKS OF MATURITY

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a participant within my focus group, my teachings should assist each of them in……

    • 790 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hris Needs

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. Identify three (3) disadvantages (other than time) of using interviews and focus groups for data collection during the analysis phase when determining HRIS needs. Recommend three (3) approaches to overcome the disadvantages. Three disadvantages of using interviews and focus groups for data collection during the analysis phase when determining HRIS needs are that focus groups are controlled by the researcher and we cannot be sure how natural the interactions are, as group interview/focus groups are not only occupying an intermediate position between other qualitative, a disadvantage is present because it means that focus groups are in some sense unnatural social settings and in less structured group settings, approaches to focus groups and interviews can also become un-useful due to lack of organization.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Healthcare Focus Groups

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Healthcare around the world varies from nation to nation, and is one of the most important considerations throughout life as generations become older and become more dependent on their country’s healthcare system. One of the most significant differences between the U.S. and other developed nations is healthcare. Medicare shares similar features to what is offered in European nations in that it is a form of universal health insurance funded by public tax dollars. Originally established in…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sausage Anne Bank

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Step Two – Building on learning from the focus groups ( Determine research design )…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Successful Focus Groups

    • 2340 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Knodel, J., 1993. Design and Analysis of Focus Group Studies. In: D. L. Morgan, ed. 1993. Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. London: Sage, pp. 35-50.…

    • 2340 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Focus Group Data Analysis

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Focus groups are the most popular form of group interviewing in the qualitative field, and they can be very useful for understanding different opinions on a topic. Also, focus groups can help us to understand the collaborative process of meaning construction and communication performances of the group. (Lindloff, Taylor, 2011, p.183). Aside from the convenience of only having to organize one meeting for the interviewing process, we decided to use a focus group in order to see the “group effect” of our topic. We are very interested to see whether complimentary or argumentative interactions are displayed. Also, we are curious as to what effect gender will have upon the communication performances. It may affect the answers to the questions, as in men and women may have similar opinions, and having a mixed gender focus group may affect how open people are with their…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Educational Racism

    • 5434 Words
    • 22 Pages

    My focus group will be highschool and college students with an emphasis on those who are in the junior class of both institutions. I will take a small sample of each student group and the educators who are responsible for them. I initially…

    • 5434 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A focus group can be defined as a group interview- centered on a specific topic and facilitated and co-ordinated by a moderator or facilitator- which seeks to generate primarily qualitative data, by capitalizing on the interaction that occurs within the group setting. The idea behind the focus group method is that group processes can help people to explore and clarify their views in ways that be less easily accessible in a one to one interview. While the focus group opens up exciting analytical possibilities, it also gives rise to a number of potentially problematic issues in this respect.…

    • 1925 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Patton, M., & Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif., London: Sage.…

    • 2417 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research Methods

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will discuss the pros and cons of each research method with respect to both a new product launch and a revised product launch. I will also explain why there are different research needs for a new product versus a re-launch. Most research can be divided into two categories. “Primary research can be defined as research designed and conducted by the person or group originating the request” (Primary Research, 2012). “Secondary research can be defined as utilizing existing research data gathered by an external source (Secondary Research, 2012). There are a wide variety of information-gathering techniques. The various data collection methods are mail surveys, telephone surveys, face to face surveys, and focus groups. The product I that I will focus on will be a new vehicle to determine which research method works the best. One must first decide what the research question is and then decide what data or variables are needed to scientifically answer the question to provide the best results for the product.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Focus Group

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The main objective of this assignment was to investigate how focus groups techniques are used to collect primary data about the phenomenon at hand in the real world.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays