Fly-By-Night Aviation: Behavior Analysis of the Organization September 30, 2013
Fly-By-Night Aviation: Behavior Analysis of the Organization
Fly-By-Night Aviation is similar to other organizations and yet it is unlike any other organization. This organization has it very own special problems and sets of circumstances that make this organization very unique. The culture of the organization is similar to what the cultural makeup of other organization that exists in today’s global markets. Communication within the organization is a complex as a 1000 piece jigsaw puzzle. Through the technical advances made in communications the organization is able to function as a virtual organization with dispersed sections. Like other organizations the authority is a top-down type of authority with some concession made to empower the employees. The Fly-By-Night Aviation motivates their employees in a standard way that is respected and normal around the globe. Increasing knowledge of emotional intelligence is defining the organization and paving the road for the future of the organization. Everything that the organization does as is fits together defining the behavior of the organization and is Fly-By-Night Aviation. The Culture of Fly-By-Night Aviation
The Fly-By-Night Aviation organization is a “Salad Bowl” of cultures. The culture is comprised of a multitude of ethnicities. Ethical identity is a given within this organization and differences are encouraged and accepted as well as adopted in some instances. This organization is comprised of employees from all parts of the United States, Trinidad, Philippines, Russia, Thailand, and South Africa. The organization works together in close proximity to each other and even is housed in the same general area when not at the work place. This organization works and lives within a single square mile of each other, all the time. “Cultural differences in language, lifestyle, and religious practice, despite being the most obvious and, for the xenophobic, most disturbing characteristics of new groups in America society, were also the aspects of ethical life most quick to change” (Macias, 2003, P. 946). In Fly-By-Night Aviation’s current organizational makeup, around 95 percent of the organizations members are former military members. As military members they all have received more training and experience adapting to different cultures than other non-military personal will ever experience in their life time. Actually most military members have received more classroom instruction about cultures and adapting to different cultures, than some students will ever receive. Integrating each employee the same exact way will make each of them feel that they belong to the organization. This integrating will make the employee feel comfortable within their surrounding and among the other employees of the organization (Baack, 2012). Along with the personal culture that Fly-By-Night Aviation is comprised of, the organization has its own dominant culture. The dominant culture of Fly-By-Night Aviation is a culture derived from the idea that there is no task that is too big or too small for the organization to undertake. As an organization they are willing and ready to accomplish exactly what is need or required to ensure task completion and mission accomplishment. This shared understanding of norms and values that are sometimes taken for granted, but remain beneath the surface of the organization and are affirmed, shared, and communicated through all of the organizational members is the organizational culture (Beyer & Trice, 1987). If completion of certain tasks requires that a team makes sacrifices, than that team will make them. If task completion requires that corners need to be cut, than all aspects of these shortcuts are examined and the best possible path is them decided upon and taken. The dominant culture sets the core values that the organization posses (Baack,...
References: Arnolds, C. A. & Boshoff, C. (2002). Compensation, esteem valence and job performance: An empirical assessment of Alderfer’s ERG theory. International Journal of Resource Management, 13(4), 697 – 719.
Baack, D. (2012). Organizational behavior. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Beyer, J. M. & Trice, H. M. (1987). How an organization’s rites reveal its culture. Organizational Dynamics, 15(4), 5 – 24
Goleman, D. (1998). What makes a leader? Harvard Business Review. 76(6), 93 – 102.
Krebs, G. L. (2011). Communication in organizations. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Macias, T. (2003). The changing structure of structural assimilation: White-collar Mexican ethnicity and the significance of ethnic identity professional organizations. Social Science Quarterly, 84(4), 946 – 957.
Sadri, G. (2012). Emotional Intelligence and leadership development. Public Personnel Management, 41(3), 535 – 548.
Weiss, J. W. (2011). An introduction to leadership. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Weiss, J. W. (2012). Organizational change. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document