Preview

florida court structure

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1113 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
florida court structure
Abstract
This paper is about Florida different court systems. I will also describe the distinguishing features of the major court systems, ranging from state-level superior courts and federal district courts through the U.S. Supreme Court. We will include key players, jurisdictional rules and interpretation issues, and the effect of evolving technologies on court proceedings at each level. The case that I decided to write about is; Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), “which was a historic case in United States Supreme Court history. This case had a unanimous decision and ruled that all state courts are obligated under the Sixth Amendment in the Constitution to grant and provide counsel in cases that are of criminal matter for any defendant who is unable to retain his or her own counsel” (Israel, 1963).. The Federal courts system has two types of courts; the first one is the Article III court. The article III courts has the U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal and it also has the U.S. Supreme Court. It also has two special courts, the U.S. Court of Claims and the U.S. Court of International Trade.

The Court promulgates rules governing the practice and procedure in all Florida courts, subject to the power of the Legislature to repeal any rule by a two-thirds vote of its membership, and the Court has the authority to repeal (if five Justices concur) any rule adopted by the Judicial Qualifications Commission. The Court has exclusive authority to regulate the admission and discipline of lawyers in Florida. To assist in the performance of those regulatory powers, the Court has adopted a code of professional conduct, established the Florida Board of Bar Examiners to administer the admissions process, and created The Florida Bar to superintend bar governance.

The highest Court in Florida is the Supreme Court, which is composed of seven Justices. At least five Justices must

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Have you ever got yourself into a really bad situation where you needed professional help? Some people get into a little bit of trouble where they need the legal help. There are many cases that went through the court systems that we don’t really even hear about because they're so small. These cases are the ones that don’t really matter. The cases that are bigger are the ones that people hear more about usually the little cases get pushed to the side and slid around to the back of the court cases and people normally never hear about those cases. Like the case in 1963 Gideon's Vs. Wainwright, many people haven’t heard about this case because it was so long ago and it wasn’t that big of a case.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second systems is the panel program, Lastly, the third is the contract system. Bach describes the public defender structure in which full time defense lawyers are employed by the state, and are provided with central legal research tools. In contrast, the panel program is a system in which “private attorneys on a pre-approved list are appointed and paid to represent indigent defendants as needed.” Further, the third option for defense is the contract system in which one or several contracted attorneys within one more or more counties to represent a fixed or maximum number of cases for a certain fee. Nevertheless, all of the defense systems have their own flaws. Public defenders are usually overworked and unpaid as they are dealing with a multitude of cases at one time. A panel program systems brings the problem of attorney selection. The judge usually makes the attorney assignment which may affect the independence of the attorney who depends on the selection of the judge for his or her source of income. Although preferred the contract system because it is easier to administer, but it also gives judges implicit power over…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judicially, the contrasts between federal government and state government could not be starker. The federal judiciary is simple and orderly, with three levels of courts – district courts, appeals courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court, the final word on all statutory and constitutional matters. All federal judges are appointed, not elected, and Supreme Court justices are appointed for life, with the specific intent of removing the judiciary from the pressures of electoral politics, allowing protection of minority interests in a government system designed to allow majority rule. In contrast, the Texas judiciary is complicated and confusing. The Texas Constitution establishes six types of courts, some of which have concurrent or overlapping jurisdictions.…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The federal court system has a similar structure to the state court system. The lowest level is the federal district court. The district court hears the civil and criminal cases that pertain to the potential unconstitutionality or impartiality of a specific state court. Federal accusations of fraud and drug crimes can also be seen here. The next level, similar to the state court system, is the U.S. Court of Appeals. This is the intermediary appellate court level where cases that have been appealed are reviewed. Atop this is the United States Supreme Court, the highest form of authority in the country. It is here where few cases are officially sent to trial, but instead cases may be reviewed by one or a group of the justices and sent back down the line.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All state level governments have a third equal branch of government known as the judiciary. The States all have different ways of selecting or appointing judges to the bench. Each state has different levels of courts with in its own justice systems and the Judges are selected and elected for different terms in each state. There are three characteristics of the Judicial system in Texas that make it stand out from other states, one is that Texas has two appellate courts of last resort, its trial courts do not have uniform jurisdiction of subject matter and the judges are chosen in partisan elections (Womack, 2018).…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeals court “appellate court” has the final verdict for the state. The judgment in this court are final, one cannot appeal the case unless it engaged in any federal laws or legitimate procedures.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Neubauer, D.W. (2004). America 's Courts and the Criminal Justice System. Thomson Wadsworth Criminal courts/ United States.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because the jury issues but a mere advisory opinion and not binding upon the court, Florida’s sentencing scheme must be unconstitutional. Florida’s statute requires that a court imposing the death sentence must make a written, detailed finding. This detailed account—not the jury’s verdict—that furnishes the basis for the Supreme Court of Florida’s review. Respondent’s rely on Hildwin (1989 case that permits the judge to find aggravating circumstances that authorize the death sentence) because it has not been expressly overruled. The ideas and principles in Hildwin were thrown out with Walton, clarified in Ring, and expressly overrule today.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court is the highest level any case can go in the state and there is only one. The Supreme Court will review cases that have been ruled by the Court of Appeals and other cases that don’t necessarily even end up in the Court of Appeals such as, death penalty cases and cases that involve judges and attorneys. In the Supreme Court, there are 7 Justices on the panel that must review and determine their own judgment and at least four of the seven justices must agree on the case for there to be…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The police forces’ assignment - to preserve order and peace - is an unsubstantiated one convoluted by innumerable factors that appear exceptional to all situations officers have to manage, whether controlling a commotion or arresting suspects. In this case, the officers every so often are obliged to make use of force throughout their responsibilities, whether throughout an arrest or protecting the public, themselves, or their co-officers from danger. This use of force, when justifiably and appropriately implemented, embodies a fundamental constituent in maintaining a peaceful society.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many parts of the courtroom work group professionals who successfully pursuit justice and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Attorney, Public Defender, Court Recorders, and the Prosecutor Attorney. Which all are part of the courtroom work group which they work together to reach a decision, in the case by interacting among themselves and who’s involved an implicit recognition and rule of civility, cooperation, and sharing their goals. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will look at the roles of the prosecutor, how the criminal justice funnel effects the courtroom work group and what will help eliminate the funnel and reduce the backlog of cases.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Unification

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Court Unification is defined as the proposal that seeks to centralize and integrate the diverse functions of all courts of general, concurrent, and exclusive jurisdiction into a more simplified and uncomplicated scheme.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meyer, J. F., & Grant, D. R. (2003). The courts in our criminal justice system. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas Court System

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The appeallant court has 3-13 justices including the chief justice. Each Court of Appeals presides over an assigned jurisdiction. Texas has fourteen Court of Appeals in which both civil and criminal appeals are heard. The 3rd court of Appeals in Texas is considered the is considered the highest in the state because aside from it's other duties, the 3rd COurt of Appeals overseas cases involving the state government. The highest state court for criminal appeals is the Court of Criminal Appeals; which is considered 1 of 2 Supreme Courts of Texas. Death penalty cases bypass the Court of Appeals and go straight to the Court of Criminal Appeals. All death penalty cases go up for appeal before the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Supreme Court of Texas is composed of one chief justice and eight justices. The Supreme Court of Texas primarily deals with cases of civil matters and juveniles. The Supreme Court of Texas also governs the rules for administration of the Texas judicial system. The Supreme Court of Texas is considered "the court of last resort" in the state.(undefined,…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose. The courts are a critical component of American criminal justice because they determine what should happen to people charged with violating the law. Courts are important beyond criminal justice, too. Disputes that arise between private parties, businesses, government officials, and the like are brought to court in order to ensure that they are heard, ideally, in a neutral forum (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Succeeding in liberation and independence is difficult within the world and as simple as legally right and legally wrong. Courts emphasize on the power of the state and the legitimate use of force and protect people against the random use of legislative authority. The tension among the general public independence and social order is long-lasting. The court front-runners recognize it is never just one way to handle a situation, the need for an unbiased and self-governing court is embedded in the social circumstance. To understand the whole court process there are three distinct elements that have to be consider to become a court, it must have proper legal authority and have all of the guild lines within the constitution. Courts are generally found in the judicial as opposed to legislative and executive branches of government, and ‘courts are empowered to make decisions that are binding. The notion of “deciding upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact” is known as adjudication, or “the process by which a court arrives at a decision regarding a case” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays