Preview

Flor Ltd: Case Study

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
513 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Flor Ltd: Case Study
Further to my telephone conversation on 26 January 2015 I am writing with reference to the County Court Judgement I have against Flor Ltd for the total amount of £4971.71 plus interest to date.

I wrote to you on 17 October 2015 requesting a refund of £2560.00 for the payment made to Flor Ltd in January 2014. I emailed to you the documents relating to the breach of contract by Flor Ltd and the County Court Judgement against them.

You called Mr Wood of Flor Ltd and advised him to reopen the case and you then confirmed to me that you were not going to take any further action because you believed the case was going to be reopened.

Although you provided Mr Wood more opportunity in "gaming the system", the outcome has remained the same and Mr Wood has failed yet again to comply with the court procedures and therefore the court
…show more content…
Please note the followings:

I entered into a contract with Flor Ltd In January 2014.

Flor Ltd failed to conform to terms of this contract under the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982.

Flor Ltd had time and opportunity to demonstrate and prove their supply of goods and services did not constitute a breach of contract.
They failed to do so. There was more than one hearing at Watford Count Court in order for the defendant to attend and request for an expert witness report to be presented in his defence. Flor Ltd again failed to do so.

A final judgement was made against Flor Ltd on 12 August 2015.

Flor Ltd then refused to make any payment and failed to respond to our written request for any arrangements to be made towards their debts.

At this stage under section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 we expect you to make a full refund to us as soon as possible.
We also request that you forward to us the details of the Flor's bank account that you made a payment to in January

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    From the information presented to myself by Kacey Musgraves it is known that Kacey, operating under “Arrow Consulting”, was asked to perform consulting services by Eric Pasley. All documents received by Kacey from Eric were presented with the name “Paslay, Bryan & Brooks, Barristers & Solicitors**” and it was to her knowledge that she was performing work for this particular group. The work was completed on November 25th, 2013, and an invoice was billed to “Paslay, Bryan & Brooks, Barristers & Solicitors**” on Decemeber 1st, 2013. Eric Paslay passed away later that December in a ski accident. On January 2nd, 2014, Kacey made a phone call to “Paslay, Bryan & Brooks, Barristers & Solicitors**” and spoke to Louisa Bryan. At this point, Louisa informed Kacey that she and Keith Brooks had no intentions to pay her outstanding account of $40,000 and that Eric was bankrupt. Louisa told Kacey that they were not a partnership but lawyers practiced “in association” and that this information can be located on their website. Kacey found out that the lawyers work under their own names with separate bank accounts and share the cost of the rent and the receptionist equally. The lawyers would sometimes work on a client file together and divide the profits equally. The website now read “Bryan & Brooks” rather than “Paslay, Bryan and Brooks”…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I have attached the outstanding invoice of 6/09/2015 for the amount of $2521.51. Per our accounting notes you have made payment of the amount of $400.00.…

    • 68 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brennan, Deane, Dawson and Gaudron JJ agreed together that given the evidence, that the Appellant may have still been lacking in…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Itemize and explain in detail any claim you made in this action for financial loss or damage which has not been explained in answer to questions above.…

    • 3197 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Again, thank you for meeting with me regarding this matter. I assure you that we will handle this matter diligently. Mr. Green your concerns were whether Mr. Brenner’s words and actions create a duty and did he owe duty to you. Based on the information that you provided, there are some facts that makes it difficult to prove that Mr. Brenner owed a duty and had a duty to you. For clarification, I will to review the facts that were provided during our meeting and explain the law regarding duty.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    TABL1710 Autosaved

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages

    ROSE & FRANK COMPANY V JR CROMPTON & BROS LTD (agreed to be bound by principle)…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crazy Eddie Electronics Stores a chattered company, traded under the symbol CRXY on the New York Stock Exchange. The company was under management of Eddie Antar family from 1971 until 1987 when Oppenheimer-Palmieri Fund (OPF) took over the company as a result of proxy bid (Sanburn, 2012). After a very short time; however, Oppenheimer-Palmieri Fund management decided to suspend the entire board of directors under the governance of the Eddie Antar family to allow room for investigation of a possible fraudulent paradigm in the company (Silverstone, 2005).…

    • 1405 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter One Review

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Application- How do the rules of law apply to the particular facts and circumstances of this case?…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The trial started and the first person who took the stand was the Sheriff, Mr Tate. The oppositions Lawyer, Mr Gilmer, was the first to ask Mr Tate some questions, all Mr Gilmer asked the Sheriff was what had happened on that night, the Sheriff replied by saying that he saw Miss Ewell on the floor beaten up, and that she had told him Tom Robinson had beaten her up and that Tom Robinson had took advantage of her. Things hadn't started well for me and Tom Robinson. I stood up and proceeded to ask Mr Tate some questions, the first question I asked was if he had called a doctor, Mr Tate replied by saying no, I asked him in a different way another two times, to make my point clear that no doctor had been called. I then asked him to describe the girls injuries, he described them and I asked on what side of her face was her black eye, after a couple of tries he finally said it was her right eye, and that it was mainly the right side of her face that was banged up badly. This was good news for me and Tom Robinson as I knew that Tom couldn't use his left hand, and it was obvious that who ever beat her up was using his left hand, I didn't reveal this to the court just yet. I then sat down and Mr Tate left the stand.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the decision, why does the court state further proceedings will be required? (5 points)…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. The Defendant was at all relevant times responsible for the management control, and administration of Friends Health NHS Foundation Trust, and for the employment of doctors, nurses, and other medical specialist s including emergency medicine, radiology and orthopaedic surgeons at and for the purpose of the said hospital.…

    • 3542 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In relation to offences which are triable either way, (e.g. Theft and Burglary) explain the role of the magistrates court in determining the appropriate venue for the trial to take place.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Engagement Letter

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1.Why would an independent audit firm, like PwC, that depends upon the maintenance of its reputation for integrity and professionalism, to retain and attract clients, risk the loss of that reputation by engaging in what appears to be unethical behaviour (not returning travel expense rebates)? Explain your answer and reasoning.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The defendants in this particular case are Star City PTY LTD. They had decided to plea not guilty and defended there employes decision to remove Mr Rixon from the casino as he was violating the casino control act.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    new trial or refer the matter to the Court of Appeal. The Minister is not responsible for deciding…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays