Preview

Flag Salute Cases in School Law

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Flag Salute Cases in School Law
Flag Salute Cases

Is the enforcement of the pledge to the flag unconstitutional? In the case Minersville School District v. Gobitis of 1940, the court upheld a Pennsylvania state law requiring all students to say the pledge to the flag. The case was brought to court because it was common practice to expel students from school that were not complying with the law. The children at the heart of the case were ten and twelve years old, and had been kicked out of school. They were refusing to pledge because it conflicted with their Jehovah’s Witnesses beliefs.
Three years later, the controversy appeared in court again as West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette. The case was brought forward on behalf of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. At this point in time, three of the justices that had ruled on the prior case had been replaced. In a 6-3 decision, the court overruled the prior Gobitis resolution and determined that the former resolution violated the students’ freedom of speech and freedom of religion which are guaranteed in the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the U.S. Although it is up to schools and the government to teach students about patriotism and the importance of our American flag, it is not the role of our public school system to punish students that choose to not participate in the pledge.
I found this interesting because I have two students in my classroom that do not say the pledge. The first boy is Muslim and it is against his religion. I am not sure why the second boy does not say the pledge, but they both stand when the rest of the class says it and they are very respectful.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pennsylvania and Rhode Island had statutes that allowed the state to pay for parts of non-secular, non-public education such as teachers instructional materials, salaries, and textbooks for religious subjects. The appellants in Pennsylvania believed that this was violating the separation of church and state described in the First Amendment. In the Rhode Island case, the appellees sued to have the statute in question declared unconstitutional by arguing that it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The district court found in favor of the appellees and held that the statute violated the First Amendment.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bethel V Fraser

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On April 26, 1983, Matthew Fraser gave a speech nominating another student for an elected position. The speech was given to about 600 fourteen year olds that chose to attend this assembly. The speech contained sexual innuendo. Before giving the speech Fraser received advise from several teachers that he should change the speech or not give one at all. But he refused to take their advice (2). The next day, he was called in to an administrative office and was suspended for three days and was told he would not be able to give his speech during graduation even though he was at the time the salutatorian. The family of Fraser filed a grievance with the Pierce County school board, but the officer upheld the suspension. In response, to that decision Matthew’s father filed a case against the school district. The District Court ruled that the student’s First Amendment right was infringed upon. The students was awarded a monetary judgment and allowed to give his graduation speech. Later, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court (4). Later, the US Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals in a 7-2 vote to reinstate the suspension, saying that the school district's policy did not violate the First Amendment (3).…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Josh Renville, an 18 year old student attending Fargo North High School has petitioned against the school in question for violating his first amendment right to freedom of speech. The school prohibited Renville from using a photograph in which he his holding his favorite rifle for his senior portrait in the yearbook. Renville claims that by prohibiting the photograph, the school is infringing on his rights to freedom of symbolic speech. Despite Renville’s claims, the actions taken by the administrators at Fargo North High were completely constitutional. Fargo North was acting well within their constitutional limits to promote the ideals of public education, to properly monitor any media that would have been associated with the school, and to limit any action that inherently interfered with the school’s disciplinary…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 6–3 decision of the majority was delivered by Justice Steven. For his majority opinion, the Alabama law "silence meditation or voluntary prayer" was unconstitutional. He found that was just to promote religion. He also found the implication of the words "voluntary prayer" as an issue of the Alabama law. The Justice Steven just focused on the purpose behind the law. The word "voluntary prayer" is not a protecting the student 's right but it encourage them to voluntary to prayer. One of the Judge also agree with his decision, Judge W.Brevard Hand, ruled prayer decisions in public school were wrong because this law is not apply to the states. As many states, they want to have the same decision and to make the world more successful. They both agree with Wallace v. Jaffree that use instructional times for silent school prayer and in public school are wrong. But with that decision, Justice William Rehnquist disagreed with them. He declared and endorses prayer in public school, even the religious in this situation. In addition, The District Court permitted the prayers to continue, because they ultimately held that the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment does not prohibit a state from establishing a religion. ("Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)"). But the Court of Appeals ruled that they were unconstitutional, because the court had considered and had rejected the historical arguments. Because of that, the state appealed to the Supreme Court. When the law appealed to the Supreme Court, the Former Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart noted that they did it as the establishment of a religion of secularism. Also, after many decision, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren has angered southern conservatives that as many reason they made even more resentment that lead to many problem. Some people of Christian thought it would be good if the prayers at school. But the Supreme Court still…

    • 1976 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Barnette asked the federal district to stop enforcement of the requirements of the patriotic exercises. A three-judge panel granted Barnette’s request. Judge John J. Parker stated that the flag-salute requirement was “violative of religious liberty when required of persons holding the religious views of the plaintiffs.” After the board’s decision, no more Jehovah’s Witnesses were expelled from schools for not saluting to the flag. The decision was then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court and by a 6-3 vote they ruled that it was unconstitutional for public school officials to require students to salute and pledge allegiance to the flag at the risk of expulsion from school on June 14th, 1943. “The Barnette Court couched its decision in language evoking freedom of speech. The choice to salute the flag was speech, the Court said, and the First Amendment protected individuals from compelled speech. It almost did not matter that the Jehovah's Witnesses had religious objections to pledging allegiance to the American flag; neither they, nor anyone, could be forced to verbally espouse beliefs they did not…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Engel Vs Vitale Case Study

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There is a profound majority in the case of Engel v. Vitale. The group consists of citizens of New York (the parents of the children attending public schools), a variety of administrative officials, as well as the founding fathers. This majority believes that the prayer authorized by the New York Regents not only violates the First Amendment but was offensive to parents and pupils of other religions. As a concurring opinion, some are under the impression that the prayer was composed as part of a governmental program to further religious beliefs, ("Legal Encyclopedia") and was being forced upon unwilling students.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Along with time, several American’s viewpoints changed, one including religion. Unfortunately, the Pledge was no longer the simplistic faith to the country. Requiring the recital of the Pledge in the school systems instigated more controversial events. The ongoing contest against the usage of the Pledge led the House of Representatives to construct the Pledge Protections Act of 2005. The bill intended “to amend the federal judicial code to deny jurisdiction to any federal court, including controversies involving the Pledge of Allegiance” (H.R. 2389 (109th)).…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    My opinion my not be the one anyone wants to here because I’m a high school but I have one. Yes, I understand that forcing kids into saying the pledge is crazy but write a note to the teacher or principal and say I don’t what my kid say this or that. I am one hundred percent positive that that school won’t force your kid into saying it. The man Mr. Newbow took it to court on how it’s very offensive to him, well there is a lot of offensive think in this world to me…

    • 1493 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The legal side of the pledge of allegiance, it has been brought up to the supreme court more then one separate occasion. “The state’s Supreme Judicial Court is currently weighing an atheist couple’s argument that the words “under God” be struck from the Pledge of Allegiance, because they claim the phrase is exclusionary to atheist children like theirs” (Let’s End the Pledge of Allegiance in Schools). Again, going back to the history, the original version of the pledge of allegiance had no stating of religion. When Francis Bellamy added “under God” into the pledge, what he didn't realize is that it was violating peoples freedom of religion and was to be used in public school systems across the country. It sparked a world wide debate that is…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What I learn is that it is unconstitutional to stand for the pledge. Therefore, I agree with that statement. One time, in school there was a student who did not wanted to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. So the teacher forced him to stand. That means it is not mandatory.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pledge of Allegiance is a ritual that should not be required to be recited in any US schools, the reason why is because it references to false religious beliefs, does not truly promise anything for the majority of America, and ultimately does not make you more “patriotic”. Some people consider the Pledge to be “An outdated and unnecessary ritual with a constitutionally questionable reference and false promises of liberty and justice for all” (Tucker). It has become an artifact of the past and really does not promise liberty and justice for all, people just recite it because they have to and really don’t mean anything they recite. Many say that the Pledge makes you more patriotic, how though? “Is San Fransisco any less patriotic because…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a fine line between patriotism and nationalism in the United States of America. In recent years, the line has become blurred as nationalistic ideologies overtake the meaning of being patriotic (Flegenheimer and Barbaro). Patriotism is the love and sense of pride one feels for their country and most Americans believe it is fundamental to the liberties granted to them; as such, many feel it is important to instill patriotism into the nation’s children. As of now, only five states do not require schools to lead a daily patriotic act (Miller), and for most schools the Pledge of Allegiance is the easiest way to obey the law. However, the indoctrination of The Pledge of Allegiance is a mere rhetoric of freedom that promotes nationalism and…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People have even taken it to the supreme court protesting the words. (Crawford,2015) Others disagree with the reciting of the flag because they believe it’s a sign of brainwashing. That by teaching children the pledge in schools, we are forcing them to show loyalty to our country, our flag, and our government. That because children cannot yet fully understand what they are swearing allegiance to and are not taught it that they are being brainwashed. “has been pounding away on the impressionable minds of children for generations.” (Crawford, 2015)…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most problems and complaints toward the pledge of allegiance come from parents, not the students. Most students are just caught in the middle of a fight between the schools trying to follow the law and their religious parents. Although changing the pledge would satisfy some parents, it would also anger other Americans who see no problem with the pledge and find it unnecessary to change the wording. The students witness the ongoing battle between the school and parents. The students are often unaware of what the problems are between the two. People who are researching about the pledge need to understand that the pledge is mostly fought by the parents not the students, another issue that need to be noted is that students cannot fully comprehend the meaning of the pledge when they learn it at as young of an age as they do in school, and lastly people need to keep in mind that the main controversy is centered around religion.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pledge of Allegiance was written to fit any person in any country but the in 1945 the U.S. adopted it and changed it twice to fit our country but it wasn’t used in the morning to start the day for fifty-five years. In 2004 a student named Michael Newdow argued that “under God” challenged the right to freedom of religion and violated the prohibition on the establishment of religion in the First Amendment of the United States…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays