Preview

Five Ways In Which God Is Proven To Be Real By St. Thomas Aquinas

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
458 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Five Ways In Which God Is Proven To Be Real By St. Thomas Aquinas
Summary
St. Thomas Aquinas devised five ways in which God is proven to be real; the first of which states that God is proven due to the motion of objects and bodies. Aquinas describes motion as “the reduction of something from potentiality to actuality”, giving the example that something like fire, which is actually hot, can change and move that which is cold but “potentially” hot (like a piece of wood), but that it itself cannot be “potentially” hot. This argument relies on three basic claims: First, he claims that, because every action results from another, if followed back to infinity, something had to move first. Secondly, it is impossible for something to move on its own accord. Third, the “first mover” starting the chain reaction of
…show more content…
His first premise that something had to be the first body/object to move is generally assumed to be true. However, it is not certain that there was a “beginning” at all. No thought experiment can prove the existence of a time that was not witnessed or recorded, nor can it prove or describe events or the behavior of bodies in such vast distances of time. For the premise that it is impossible for an object to move itself, one has to look no further than life itself to see people, animals, and microorganisms moving on their own free will without being pushed along by outside forces. On a more basic level, a knowledge of basic physics reveals the concept of temperature, which is the measure of the movement and vibrations of subatomic particles. They move due to energy transference, even in the coldest of conditions (except absolute zero, but that is impossible to achieve) and even without outside influence. Third, Aquinas lets his unwavering belief in God define the entity or object that is the “first mover”. Assuming there was a “beginning” in time and movement that does not depend on nature, why would Aquinas’s definition of the God deity be the correct

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The idea of God is intense, as both of these analyses have shown. Aquinas’ idea of God is “Ipsum esse subsistens,” or Subsistent Act of Existing Itself (Magee, 2015). To speak of God as a self-subsistent being is to say He “Just Is.” He articulates every creature is “fundamentally composed of essence and existence.” In order for everything to exist, there must be a First Cause and Aquinas says God is that cause because without it, nothing exists. God is infinite simplicity and perfect. Aquinas and Tillich both see God as Being Itself (Fesser, 2011). Tillich places God “above God.” He writes, “God does not exist.” However, this is not in an attempt to deny God, but to demonstrate that God transcends everything.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cosmological argument originated from Plato and Aristotle however it was mainly later developed by St. Thomas Aquinas. Their arguments both began with the idea that motion needs a prior agency. Plato then identified the first cause of the chain of events as the need for an unmoved mover which started off the chain.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Telelogical argument

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He stated that this order cannot happen by chance but designed, by an intelligent Being. For ex; a small baby learning to walk and the mother (intelligent being) directing the baby on how to walk.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquinas’ first way is the way of motion. Aquinas uses the existence of motion of demonstrate the existence of God. He said that “Nothing can be moved from a state of potentiality to actuality, except by something in a state of actuality”. Here Aquinas uses Aristotle’s argument of the Prime Mover. The Prime Mover causes the movement of other things, in other words, it does not start off the movement by giving it some kind of push, but it is the purpose, or end, or the teleology, of the movement. Change in an object is always caused by an external movement – nothing can change itself. These movements go back in a causal chain, but Aquinas said this chain cannot be infinite so there must be something which set off this chain of movements, an unmoved mover, Prime Mover (God). Things change to fulfil their potential. If things could change themselves they would be both…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the cosmological argument was expressed by Aquinas it was originally introduced and influenced by Aristotle. Aristotle stated ‘the series must start with something since nothing can come from nothing’. This suggests that Aristotle believed that the creation of universe is dependent on a supreme, ultimate primary mover, and is therefore an ‘unmoved mover’. Overall it is the vital cause of the creation of the universe, and is identified in Christianity as God. Aristotle persuaded this using the idea of planet motion which he highlighted as the cause of the change of seasons. For this transformation to happen, it required an ‘unmoved mover’ who would be capable of upholding order of the universe during the alterations. Aquinas used this concept as the labour of God.…

    • 789 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the cosmological argument was expressed by Aquinas it was originally introduced and influenced by Aristotle. Aristotle stated ‘the series must start with something since nothing can come from nothing’. This suggests that Aristotle believed that the creation of universe is dependent on a supreme, ultimate primary mover, and is therefore an ‘unmoved mover’. Overall it is the vital cause of the creation of the universe, and is identified in Christianity as God. Aristotle persuaded this using the idea of planet motion which he highlighted as the cause of the change of seasons. For this transformation to happen, it required an ‘unmoved mover’ who would be capable of upholding order of the universe during the alterations. Aquinas used this concept as the labour of God.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A. For Thomas philosophy is ancilla theologiae (handmaiden of theology). Aquinas was first and foremost a theologian, though he was quite capable of distinguishing philosophy proper from theology. He held that…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The argument starts by stating there is an efficient cause for everything. Nothing can be an efficient cause of itself. It is not possible to regress to infinity in efficient causes (Harris, 44). To take away the cause is to take away the effect. If there is no first cause then there will be no others (Harris, 45). Clearly Aquinas argues for an Efficient Cause. It indicates that each prior cause must itself have its own cause leading to God as the Efficient Cause (Harris, 45). His “Third proof” is the argument from…

    • 2372 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before Thomas Aquinas died he was writing the Summa Theologian, which was regarded as one of the greatest works of medieval theology. Although he didn't finish he made 4 very interesting arguments about Transubstantiation. He asked whether the substance of bread and wine remain in this sacrament after consecration, whether the substance of bread or wine is annihilated after the consecration of this sacrament, whether bread can be changed into the body of Christ and whether the accidents of bread and wine remain in the sacrament after this conversion. All of the questions were very good topics and all of them had supporting information. Thomas Aquinas was a brilliant man that died in the middle of his greatest piece.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If this was possible, it would require something to exist before the time it existed which does not make sense in the order of time. He also explains that things are only brought into existence because some other external cause or a chain reaction of causes. So, how did necessary being come into existence? Why was the first necessary being there? How could it cause itself into being when all other things need to be brought into existences by another cause? This implies that either the first necessary cause/ being has always been there or that the first necessary being existed before it existed to bring itself into existence. He also says that if all…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Much of St. Thomas's thought is an attempt to understand Christian orthodoxy in view of Aristotelian philosophy. He had a version of this argument called the Argument for Motion. He stated that things in motion must be caused to move because they cannot bring themselves into motion. And since there cannot be an infinite regression of movers there must be an Unmoved Mover.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    St. Thomas Aquinas presents one of the earliest teleological arguments in his Summa Theologica. Aquinas argues that anything with knowledge moves toward and end or cause. But, natural bodies, or planets, do not have knowledge and they still move toward an end. By an end, Aquinas means that the planets take the same path of orbit around the sun. Thus, Aquinas argues, if an unintelligent body is moving toward an end, it must be directed by an intelligent being. This intelligent being must be God (Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Article 3, Question…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This particular argument is also in favor if the idea that God does in fact exist, but Aquinas has a different explanation from Anselm. Thomas Aquinas presents the argument known as the “Cosmological” or “first cause”. In a few words, this means that Aquinas believes there must have been a first cause in the world. Aquinas argues that the proof of Gods existence is based on the basis of experiences. God must exist because every being that is dependent for existence was caused by something else that happened prior to it. He believes either there is a boundless chain of contingent beings that is extending backwards or there is a first cause, something that was not caused by something else but began everything else. But in reality, there cannot be a continuous chain extending backwards. Therefore; there is a first cause, something that was not caused by anything else but started everything else that currently exists. Aquinas claims the existence of God can be proven in five ways: Argument from motion, Nature of efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and Governance of the world. Aquinas gives us an argument that is not hard to interpret. There must have been one who created mankind, constructing the world one being at a time. It is very easy to go along with the idea that there is one person or thing that created everything else. While this argument is clear and…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Agnosticism - 1

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Thomas Aquinas is a firm believer of the existence of a god; He argues for the proof of god by his five proofs. For motion to take place, something must have caused it to move, every effect has a cause, Something that doesn’t exist cannot make something come into existence, a standard of living, and all beings considered unintelligent half to be led some something. For his first “proof of God” Aquinas argues that any motion that takes place requires something to cause it to move. For example a ball won’t move, unless a slope causes it to roll down a hill, or a child kicks it. So the ball always had the potential to move, but its potential cannot be reached unless something acts upon it. By this theory something had to start the movement of the universe, which the only first mover could be God. In his second proof Cause and effect is brought into play. It is very similar to his first proof in that nothing would happen unless something caused it to happen. And because an infinite series of cause and effect is irrational, there must be an original cause that requires no cause; Hence God. The third proof deals with being or not being. All things have the possibility of existing or not existing. The shirt that you are wearing now exists but there was a time when it did not. Aquinas’s argument is that for that something to go from not being to being, there had to be an original being to create it. For example the shirt that you wear had to be created in a factory; And to manufacture something you must “be”. So…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological argument

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The argument from motion explains that everything that moves is moved by something else and there must be an initial cause of movement in the universe. The unmoved mover is God. The problem with this is if everything in the world was in motion, then for these objects to move something must have started it. Aquinas believed God was the unmoved mover and that he put the universe in motion.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays