Although the theory that individualization resides in one’s friction ridge skin is reliant upon the fundamental belief that the friction ridge detail is unique, even down to the single ridge unit, this principal cam into question in the 1993 Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U. S. 579, 588 case.
The importance of objectively reviewing the process used by examiners to ascertain one’s identity based solely off fingerprint evidence, particular those associated with a crime, was outlined by the United States Supreme Court ruling on Daubert Hearing standards for expert scientific testimony in which the court discussed four basic factors in regard to scientific testimony. The application of ACE-V into the friction ridge skin examination process ensures that the same information will be derived by a secondary examiner, keeping the fingerprint comparison process objective (Coppock,