Preview

FINAL ASS ON THINKERS

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2557 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
FINAL ASS ON THINKERS
Compare and contrast between Aristotle, Plato and Machiavelli.

There have been many prodigious thinkers through the area of modern society with uncountable diverse themes at the centre of their thinking, numerous of these thinkers, directly or indirectly, have had an touch or have moved alteration to political understanding. Political beliefs discovers its grounds in ancient Greece and its city states, particularly Athens, and the several diverse political structures adopted and established by them. Protuberant thinkers from these times such as Plato and Aristotle and their books The Republic and Politics correspondingly, were some of the first minds to form, dispute and disagree about political thoughts and have noticeably swayed one great mind after another. It rapidly came to light the significance and greatness political thought had, and unquestionably would have, on the world for, probable, the rest of cultured being. Later prominent thinkers comprise names such as N. Machiavelli who was present during the European Renaissance period and, in his works The Prince (1513) and The Discourses on Livy (1517), points out many ideas mainly regarding how to gain then sustain power and the welfares of a republic society. J.J. Rousseau, J. Locke and T. Hobbes did greatly for the development of ideas about the social contract with work on how and why humans left the “state of nature” and shaped societies and the inferences of them doing so and what the ideal state would be.
Aristotle who was a Greek seeking the truth, a theorist, and a scientist. His teacher’s name was Plato. Aristotle is commonly recognised as the most projecting olden philosopher in many parts of philosophy, along with political theory. His life seems to have persuaded his political belief in diverse conduct: his biological awareness has mixed in his political life. His political interest also and his sympathy for the democratic system like dominion possibly have been positive by his experience of



Bibliography: Aristotle (384-322 B.C.E.). 1994-2007. Regents of the University of California. May 1st 2007 <http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/aristotle.html> Ross, David Lear, Jonathan. Aristotle: the desire to understand. The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambrige, United Kingdom: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, 1999. Aristotle, 1998. Politics. Translated by E.Barker. Oxford. Berlin. I., 1981. The Originality of Machiavelli in N. Warburton., D. Matravers., J. Pike, ed. Reading Political Philosophy: Machiavelli to Mill. London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 43-57. Cockburn, P. 2003. Britain’s Role In Shaping Iraq. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2719939.stm [accessed 17 October 2009] Machiavelli, N., 2009 Yack, B., 1985. Community and Conflict in Aristotle’s Political Philosophy. The Review of Politics, 47(1), pp.92-112.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Aquinas Vs Hobbes

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of Aristotle’s most prominent teachings in “Politics,” is the interpretation of the state of nature. “It is evident that the state is a creation of nature, and that man is by nature a political animal.” (I. 2. 153a.) From this statement, it is clear that human beings are innately political, regardless of the setting they are in. One example he gives to support his argument is that the hand of a body is similar to an individual of a city. This analogy demonstrates the relation of one functioning part that is attached to the whole and complete functioning system. A functional hand is only used when the entire body is operating correctly. Similarly, the city is comprised of multiple individuals each with specific duties to create a collection of different parts with different functions, all working simultaneously together for the city. The goal is to pursue the common good of the city, even when it conflicts with one’s self-interest. The common good gives people the opportunity to reach the highest form of virtue and requires the whole community. Another example…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Machiavelli, no matter how extreme, violent at times, rigorous, and blunt he may come across, by setting examples and guides structured around the utilization of ruthlessness and egocentric cunning as the process of gaining political power, showed what a clear mind he had on what it takes to be an awe-inspiring leader, master of the art of winning a battle, and conquering lands. In this paper, by comparing the two, human nature and political potency, through the use of different ideologies of both, Plato and Machiavelli, corroborated that they were very powerful, unparalleled influences in the philosophy of human nature and the processes of political power as theorist of their…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in exile, Niccoló Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes wrote about their political views on how to inaugurate a sturdy government. During each of their lives, they both contributed political philosophies that had differences and similarities. In Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’s The Leviathan, their philosophies are portrayed on how to maintain a stable government. Hobbes is recognized as the founder of the most later Western political philosophy in response to the social contract theory he established in his 1651 book Leviathan. Machiavelli is also a founder of an important term that has a lot of meaning in history. He is the founder of “Machiavellianism”, the person considers their goals to be of prime importance and that any method may be used to achieve them.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle a Greek philosopher born in Macedonia in 394 BC has different forms of viewing politics. He describes the polis, or city, as a koinonia, or political association, and he proclaims that all relations, like all thoughtful human acts, are shaped with the objective of accomplishing a particular good. He says that being part of a polis is the only way someone can be a part of a great life. Because politics are necessary for this Aristotle says, "Man is by nature a political animal."(Aristotle 90). As part of the books discussion of the economy a city-state needs, Aristotle defends the system of private property and argues against extreme capitalism and says that slavery is necessary in order for society to function and democracy as being…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When comparing Hobbes,’ Sandel’s and Machiavelli’s viewpoints regarding which of Aristotle’s three main categories of knowledge is the most significant for establishing good political systems or making good political decisions, one must consider what each theorists considers to be a good political system and create a link between the two. The most important category of knowledge for establishing and making good political systems for Aristotle is practical knowledge, the purpose of politics is to produce good, virtuous citizens, the law promotes just actions, purpose of legislators is to establish good laws. The most important category of knowledge for Hobbes is scientific knowledge, the absolute sovereign represents the commonwealth of its citizens, the absolute sovereign must uphold their self preservation, and all laws…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stoicism And Skepticism

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sabine, in the introductory essay, mentions the shift that occurred in the type of political organization after Aristotle’s death. Before, it was a city-state, or a polis construction. However, a change towards a larger scale political organization and expansion of ideals causes the polis. This political order is explained,…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Meno

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Allen, Reginald E. Greek Philosophy, Thales to Aristotle. New York, NY: Free Press, 1966.…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Logos Ethos Pathos

    • 1236 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Henning, Martha L. "A General Summary of Aristotle 's Appeals . . ." Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nelson, Brian. Western Political Thought From Socrates to the Age of Ideology. 2nd. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1996. Print.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Was Plato a totalitarian

    • 1486 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bibliography: Boucher, D. and Kelly, P. (2003) Political Thinkers: From Socrates to the Present, New York: Oxford University Press, Pp.62-3…

    • 1486 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes vs Machiavelli

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Philosophy is an academic practice that dives into the study of the nature of things including knowledge, and existence. Its context of the norms of society and the reasons behind these norms are studied by philosophers whom include Thomas Hobbes and Nicolas Machiavelli. These two recognized philosophical minds have delved into the concept of a ruling government body, including governments and royalty. Hobbes penned the famous Leviathan while Machiavelli wrote the controversial The Prince. Both of these books include a deep look into powerful people and their ways of keeping peace and functionality in their given societies. Since the two came to their conclusions through different means, it is easy to see where the two would disagree; one wrote based on a logical standpoint of what should help a society run smoothly, and the other wrote based on what he actually observed and situations he studied. However, even though there are differences of writing between these two philosophers, there are both similarities and differences between their observations and conclusions about governors and the governed. While both Hobbes and Machiavelli believe in a very pessimistic view of society as a whole, their opinions differ in relation to the rulers’ treatment of their people.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicolo Machiavelli’s The Prince, is, by far, one of the most widely known and read books about politics in the last 500 hundred years, as well as an extremely innovative book, being one of the first books of the modern political philosophy.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a book that influenced many great political leaders including Henry VIII and Adolf Hitler. This book caused great controversy; the disagreement this book caused even led to the Church placing the book into the prohibited index. After his book was published and read, Machiavelli had become known as the founder of modern day, secular politics. Niccolo now wore the title of “father to political science”. Machiavelli’s The Prince, is considered to be the first modern book on political science because was innovative; it promoted a secular society and contained a concept of realism.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legalizing Marijuana

    • 2971 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Mallison, Jeffrey. Commentary of Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics. Renaissance Quarterly, spring 2007, Vol. 60, Iss 1, p.208-209. 2p…

    • 2971 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli was at his time and continues to be now days one of the most influential and revolutionary authors known throughout the centuries. His writings, distinct from other renaissance authors of the epoch, make emphasis on his personal views and his opinions on the political matters taking place in Florence, Italy. Further discussed in the text are two of Machiavelli’s most renowned works, The Prince and the Discourses on Livy. Both books comprehend Machiavelli’s understandings of politics and explicit analysis on the various methods of governments with respect to principalities and republics.…

    • 2153 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays