Summary of 'Fenimore Cooper's Literary Offenses' by Mark Twain
Crissy Cavallaro
March 10, 2012
“Fenimore Cooper’s Literary Offenses”
Mark Twain critics Fenimore Cooper’s Deerslayer tale in his essay, “Fenimore Cooper’s Literary Offenses.” Twain’s essay gives a litany of literary offenses in which Fenimore Cooper commits in his work. This passage describes the inaccuracy in Cooper’s writing and his Indian story. Through his use of ad hominem, rhetorical questions and a mocking tone, Mark Twain manifests his critical attitude towards Cooper and his inaccurate writing. This piece is certainly an ad hominem, for it attacks not solely Coopers witting, but Cooper’s abilities as an observer himself. In paragraph 1, Twain says, “Cooper’s eye was splendidly inaccurate. Cooper seldom saw anything correctly. He saw nearly all things as through a glass eye, darkly.” Mark Twain has simply nothing nice or positive to say about Cooper. After completely negating all of Cooper’s Indian story, Twain says, “This scow episode is really a sublime burst of invention; but it doesn’t not thrill, because the inaccuracy of details throw a sort of air of fictitiousness and general improbability over it. This comes from Cooper’s inadequacy as observer.” Twain draws the the reader in with a quick bit of positive lingo when he says the writing is a “sublime burst of invention,” but then he immediately contradicts his words and proposes that the whole story is illogical. Twain also claims that he is simply “no architect” because the construction of his house is fallacious.
Later in paragraph 2 of this excerpt, Twain asks rhetorical questions to further his point and engage the reader in his thinking. He asks, “Did the Indians notice that there was going to be a tight squeeze? Did they notice that they could make money by climbing down out of that arched sapling and just stepping aboard when the ark scraped by?” He simply asks these to prove the obliviousness of Cooper’s Indians and furthermore, the obliviousness of Cooper. These rhetorical
March 10, 2012
“Fenimore Cooper’s Literary Offenses”
Mark Twain critics Fenimore Cooper’s Deerslayer tale in his essay, “Fenimore Cooper’s Literary Offenses.” Twain’s essay gives a litany of literary offenses in which Fenimore Cooper commits in his work. This passage describes the inaccuracy in Cooper’s writing and his Indian story. Through his use of ad hominem, rhetorical questions and a mocking tone, Mark Twain manifests his critical attitude towards Cooper and his inaccurate writing. This piece is certainly an ad hominem, for it attacks not solely Coopers witting, but Cooper’s abilities as an observer himself. In paragraph 1, Twain says, “Cooper’s eye was splendidly inaccurate. Cooper seldom saw anything correctly. He saw nearly all things as through a glass eye, darkly.” Mark Twain has simply nothing nice or positive to say about Cooper. After completely negating all of Cooper’s Indian story, Twain says, “This scow episode is really a sublime burst of invention; but it doesn’t not thrill, because the inaccuracy of details throw a sort of air of fictitiousness and general improbability over it. This comes from Cooper’s inadequacy as observer.” Twain draws the the reader in with a quick bit of positive lingo when he says the writing is a “sublime burst of invention,” but then he immediately contradicts his words and proposes that the whole story is illogical. Twain also claims that he is simply “no architect” because the construction of his house is fallacious.
Later in paragraph 2 of this excerpt, Twain asks rhetorical questions to further his point and engage the reader in his thinking. He asks, “Did the Indians notice that there was going to be a tight squeeze? Did they notice that they could make money by climbing down out of that arched sapling and just stepping aboard when the ark scraped by?” He simply asks these to prove the obliviousness of Cooper’s Indians and furthermore, the obliviousness of Cooper. These rhetorical