Preview

Felon Disenfranchisement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
947 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Felon Disenfranchisement
Disenfranchisement Today:
A Fitting Punishment or a Way to Oppress the Lower Class
Laura Winant
Virginia Commonwealth University

Author’s Note:
Laura E. Winant, Department of Criminal Justice, Virginia Commonwealth University
This paper is an extra credit assignment for Criminological Theory under Professor Morris.
Contact: Winantle@mymail.vcu.edu

Abstract
Felon disenfranchisement is a serious issue in the United States. It removes a person’s right to vote after incarceration. It is sometimes speculated that disenfranchisement racially discriminates. This is often thought to be true because the majority of those who are disenfranchised are African American males. While it does have roots in racial disadvantaging, it does not effect the outcome of polls in a drastic enough way to require a reform. There is no study that proves that these felons would vote if they were not disenfranchised.

Felon Disenfranchisement is the act of prohibiting convicted felons from voting in elections. This type of disenfranchisement can be traced back to Greek and Roman civilizations. In ancient times, disenfranchisement was used to remove a convict’s civilian status and mentally isolate him from his fellow citizens. In the United States, a majority of states have held laws that disenfranchise condemned citizens from voting. In the last 40 years, due to the dramatic expansion of the criminal justice system, these laws have significantly affected the political voice of many American communities and people find themselves questioning the fairness of these laws when a majority of those affected are minorities. Reform of these policies has been based on a reconsideration of their legitimate correctional uses and the interests of full democratic participation.
States vary vastly in the way they handle disenfranchisement, some making it semi-permanent and others making it nearly impossible to win voting rights back. If you are a convicted felon from Maine or Vermont, you



References: Uggen, C and Manza, J. (2002) Democratic Contraction? Political Consequences of Felon Disenfranchisement in the United States. American Sociological Review, Vol. 67, No. 6 (Dec., 2002), pp. 777-803. Thomas, M. (2004) Felon Disenfranchisement and Voter Turnout. The University of Chicago: The Journal of Legal Studies. (April, 2004)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Felons Right to Vote

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The lines are long, it’s raining, it’s hot, or it may be cold, but exercising your right to vote is as important as all of your other civil rights. As Americans we have came a very long way when it comes to protecting our civil rights, and choosing the right candidate to protect our country. In 1964, three civil right activist set out to set up a voter’s registry for African Americans, but it was short lived because they were brutally murder by members of the Klu Klux Klan in Philadelphia, Mississippi((IMBD). This helped pave the road for African Americans to get out and register to vote. Not long ago, only one-third of African Americans were registered to vote, and two third of the voters were white, because African Americans was terrified of voting, or they chose not to. While voting is a right that we all have, if you have committed a crime and it has been classified as a felon, in most states you are restricted from voting. Since the Voting Rights Act of 1965, there has been a significant increase of voters at the polls. It has increased significantly in the African America and Hispanic populations and due to this, President Obama, an African American, was voted into office in 2008, and is now serving his second term. There have been many protests regarding felons voting and their civil rights being violated. While three great men lost their lives over such a significant cause in Mississippi, in order for a convicted felon to vote in Mississippi, his or her state representative must personally author a bill reenfranchising that individual. Both houses of the legislature must then pass the bill. Re-enfranchisement can also be granted directly by the governor. (“ProCon.org”). …

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this chapter, Garland focuses on the changing economic, political, and social conditions of late modernity to explain the shifts in crime control and criminal justice practices after the breakdown of the Penal-Welfare State. One major transformation of economic conditions is the shift into a consumer-based economy, where many minorities and low-wage workers began to feel massive economic instability because jobs became scarce and income inequality became more widespread. Through the introduction of the mass media and the television, society has become warier of government institutions as the media is now able to pry into their secrets. The social and cultural changes affected the criminal justice system in that society became more prone…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Revoking convicted felon’s rights to vote has been an issue at hand in politics since the beginning of our nation. Edward Fesser published an article in the magazine titled City Journal called “Should Felons Vote?” In the article he is arguing against the views of Democrats and their motives for restoring convicted felons voting rights. He says their motives are to expand their chances in winning an election. Edward Fesser’s argument is weak because he fails to provide substantial evidence supporting his arguments on the disenfranchisement of felons.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think a convicted felon should have the right to vote after they spend their sentence in prison and finish with parole. I will give you three reasons why they should. My first reason is they are citizens like us and they might not be guilty. My second reason is ever though there not out and free they do watch TV to see what’s going on. My final reason is if it was polices officer or a famous person they still are aloud. The next paragraph I will tell you about my first reason.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to the law, everyone is entitled to vote, to be specific, the age of 18 and above. I believe felons should be allowed to vote because people make mistakes. There are many people who want to live right, they can’t because they are being kept down, the situation they’re in leads them to be in a bad place. For example, if a person commits theft, it’s most likely they’re poor. He/she steals because they are desperate for what they don’t have; basic needs or necessities of life. I believe felons should be allowed to vote, even if they are criminals, they deserve a second chance, it is not fair to take away their right to vote. This is as if like taking away their freedom of speech. Everyone has a voice and it should stand out, even if…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When offenders seek employment and housing, they are often denied a position or home when employers and landlords retrieve their criminal history. Such practices create a significant struggle for ex-offenders to become productive citizens while avoiding recidivism. As we know, recidivism is harmful to both the offender, the community, and in some ways the economy/tax payer revenue. Approximately “sixty-billion dollars” is disbursed annually to house offenders’ country-wide and when ex-convicts reoffend and are sent back to prison, costs increase resulting in spiked taxes for citizens and overcrowding for…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Alexander, who for many years worked as a civil rights lawyer, uses her vast experience and knowledge concerning the criminal justice system to craft a meticulously researched argument that “colorblindness” is this generation’s most important civil rights issue. As the title indicates, she makes the bold claim that mass incarceration is the 21st century version of Jim Crow. This era in our racial history was one in which brutally devastating laws discriminated and segregated black populations. During Jim Crow, the idea of justice did not exist for black people within law enforcement or court systems. Though her argument is daring, Alexander successfully proves it by analyzing the criminal justice system. She discusses multiple ideas to formulate a case for individuals who are interested in social justice that refocus efforts to tackle the issue of over-populated prisons. In the books introduction, Alexander asserts that she is writing for an audience that cares deeply about racial justice, but also, she wants to empower individuals who have a impression that our nation’s criminal justice system is flawed, but do not have the data or evidence to back up their assumptions.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many of the prisoners being democrats, this takes away from all their votes with a mass of the people not being allowed to vote. A good example of this could be the election in 2004 with George Bush, a republican, who was able to win the presidential election with influence from his brother in Florida to get him an extra electoral vote which counts more than the popular vote. Felon’s rights are already limited with many restrictions being put on them due to the government not having any trust over them and still see them as criminals. A list of restrictions including traveling abroad, owning a gun, many employment opportunities as well as other privileges citizens are able to use such as applying for grants, living in public housing, SSI and food stamps. If a felon is a parent as well, their parental rights are diminished because in any case the judge will award the other parent custody due to the conviction. With all this, this conviction will be on the person’s personal…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The number of Americans who cannot vote because they have been convicted of a felon continues to rise. According to the National institute of justice about a quarter of felons are in prison, but the rest have completed their sentences and are on probation or parole. The only reason not to let them vote is to stigmatize them or to continue punishing them. Voting would help ex felons re-engage with society by showing them that they have equal importance in the society, for example ,it shows that their opinion is just as important as anyone else's. Also, this may not always be a good thing. Not all ex felons can be trusted and not all ex felons judgment and credibility can be trusted.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Benefits Of Ex-Felons

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page

    You are correct, when you said that’ it is up to the states to restore the rights of a felon” I did my research and found out that depending on the state, the crime that was committed and the time that has passed since finishing the sentence, some ex-felons can have their voting rights restored. I even found out that there are two states that allow felons to vote while in prison (Vermont and Maine), I have to admit that I was not expecting that one.…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The citizens’ opinions ranged between supporting and not supporting. The citizens’ opinions fell in-between those two. 9.9 percent thought felons should never lose their right to vote. 31.6 percent thought they should only lose the right while they are incarcerated. 5.0 percent thought felons should lose their right while on parole or probation. 35.2 percent thought the right to vote should be lost while incarcerated and on parole or probation. Overall, 81.7 percent of the respondents did not support the permanent elimination of voting rights. The respondents’ supported having felons voting rights restored at some point (Pinaire et al., 2002). When the authors asked the respondents why they wanted permanent or temporary voting restrictions, 32.7 percent said “felons have proven that they should not be treated as citizens” (Pinaire et al., 2002, 1541). The authors were surprised that 31.1 percent had chosen none of the above/other reason. Pinaire et al. (2002) believe there must have been some other reason the respondents wanted temporary or permanent voting restrictions. A little more than half strongly or somewhat agreed to have felons rights restored after completing their sentence. About 44.2 percent somewhat or strongly disagreed to the restoration of…

    • 2365 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Blacks are arrested and incarcerated at a higher rate than Whites, Hispanics and other minorities. While statistics from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (2011) show that crime has decreased for 2011, the rate of incarceration for blacks has increased. Research, through the years, has shown a form of racial oppression, sustained by structural discrimination and inequality (Quigley, 2010). This matter of racial disparity or inequality has been supported by government, law enforcement and the judicial system. As Jim Crow came to represent the racial oppression and segregation after the Civil War and before the Civil Rights Movement, many are comparing this mass incarceration to being a new Jim Crow type of racism, separate but not equal (Alexander, 2011).…

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay Felons

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Felons should not have the right to vote while in prison, but when they get out of prison they should be able to apply for restitution, so that they can get their rights back. No-one that is guilty of any crime should be allowed to vote until they have finished serving their punishment. If you have done something to wrong the country than one of the punishment should be losing the privilege to vote, because by voting people make decisions for the country. People who can’t be trusted should definitely not be trusted by the country shouldn’t be making decisions for the country.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It's about dignity, honor, and improving the odds of a safe, successful return to society. And it’s about second chances - who among us doesn’t need and deserve a second chance?” (Orlando Sentinel by Michael T. Morley). Three states out of the fifty do not let convicted felons vote: Kentucky, Iowa, and Florida. Things have not always been this way. Around the time of 1960-1970, felons started to gain their right to vote back. But, in 2000, 6000,000 felons who paid their time were still not allowed to vote. As of October 2016, 6.1 million people can’t vote in the presidential election because of felony disenfranchisement laws. After convicted felons have paid their debt to society, they should be able to vote because money would be saved,…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay discusses my reflection on whether or not felons should have the right to vote. A felon is defined as a person who has been convicted of a felony, which is a crime punishable by death or a term in state or federal prison. A felony is a serious crime usually punishable by imprisonment or death. Convicted felons should not be allowed to vote. Many Americans were not allowed to vote these past elections. It wasn’t because they didn’t pay taxes or were mentally incompetent or underage. The reason why they can’t vote is because they are convicted felons. Once someone has committed a serious crime or felony, they have shown that they are not trustworthy enough to vote. Because they disobeyed the law, they should not have the obligation to vote. If one is sent to prison, they have agreed that most of their rights have been taken. Prison is meant to be a punishment and one of their punishments is their loss of freedom and democratic rights for their time of their sentence. Convicted felons have also demonstrated poor judgment and should not be trusted with a vote. The main point of a prison sentence to show the offender and society that criminal behavior results in loss of freedom and most of the rights that freedom has to offer. Therefore felons should not be allowed to vote. Although some people believe that felons should be allowed to vote at any circumstance but I believe that if they are felons they have already lost that opportunity because they have decided to make the choice to participate in criminal activities. If the felon is not willing to follow the law himself, then they should not demand the right to vote. In California, felons serving time in prison or county jail are denied their right to vote. According to The Sentencing Project, 5.3 million Americans were unable to vote in 2008 due to a felony conviction. Unfortunately, statistics show that this number is expected to rise to 6 million.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays