Federalists: Compare And Contrast Essay

Good Essays
The Constitution of the United States is what many people consider the back bone of our nation. It was written in a time of need, when the federal government could not lead the country to the promise of a truly developed nation. Now, in 2016, 227 years later, this document still stands and makes sure our government does its job correctly and efficiently for the persons in their country. Although the Constitution became official, this did not happen without the compromise of the Federalists and the Anti-federalists. These two sides had their say, yet they came to terms and both acquired what they wanted in the Constitution. Before 1789, there became two main political groups in the country. The Federalists, and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, had a good amount of members, including three who wrote the famous Federalist Papers, which were a series of essays that advocated the ratification of the Constitution, James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton. These men believed in a strong central government, hence the name Federalists, …show more content…
was the Anti-Federalists. They of course were opposed to the Federalists on how they viewed how the government should be conducted. These men, Mercy Otis Warren, Richard Henry Lee, Samuel Adams, among many others, drafted their own works which made up the Anti-Federalists papers. The Anti-Federalists party was based on the fact that the central government should not be very strong and that more power should reside to the states. Their main cause of this thinking was because they believed that if the country gave too much power to the federal government, it would become too powerful and they would end up where they started before the Revolutionary War, the government in control of everything and the people not having a say about any of it. The main reason the Anti-Federalists were tolerant of the passing of the Constitution was because they were able to have a bill of rights put into

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ian Federalist Paper #15 The Federlists and Anti-Federlists both saw a need for change in the government. The only poblem with this is that the two had almost opposite ideas although they realized the the Articles of Confederation didn't have enough power. The main obstacle was how much power should the new government have. The Federalist form of government provided the best government of the two. Alexander Hamilton was unsatisfied with the Articles of Confederation. He…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were individuals who supported the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution as stated in the book, "the critics of the Constitution were by no means a unified group" (Faragher, 180). I found it interesting that the Constitution was initially influenced by the Federalist model in regards to interpretation but the pendulum has now swung in the opposite direction to a more Anti-Federalist approach (Content 8-2). The Constitution was ratified and the Federalists…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, had disparate visions about how the country should be administered, which would cause a complication with our founding fathers, who formulated a way to run the country. Federalists assumed to have a forceful central government, central bank. Federalists presumed that in a government, checks and balance works out, so there is no tension between individuals. With Federalists, they remained with the strong central governments, whereas the Anti- Federalists wanted…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    vastly diverse from each other. While Thomas Jefferson was an anti-Federalist, many of the other Constitution makers were Federalists. John Adams, a Federalist, was elected as the second American president in 1796 and served in office until 1800. Thomas Jefferson’s election is termed “The Revolution of 1800” because so many of his ideas contrasted with those of the previous president. Though both the Anti-Federalist and Federalist Constitution makers were aristocratic and wanted a government removed…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans like a lot of the same things? Well, they actually didn't like a lot of the same things and rarely saw eye to eye. One of the many things that they disagreed on or had different takes of it was the government. The Federalists wanted a strong government and would do all that they can to have one. The Republicans, on the other hand, did not want a strong government because they feared that if they had a strong government, they would endanger people's…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalist party was an American political party from 1792 to 1816. The Democratic-Republican party was founded in 1792 by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans viewed society differently. Being they viewed society in a way to help people individually or help them as a whole. Both political groups viewed many key issues differently that played a role in 1792 to 1816. The Democratic-Republicans and Federalist were facing economic issues, government…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People often mistake the Federalist party and the Democratic- Republican party, even consider that they are the same things. There are a lot of similarities and differences between federalists and Democratic- Republican regarding social, economic, and political philosophies. Both parties were formed in 1791 and the Democratic- Republicans opposed the federalist in their foreign policy. The democratic- Republican were successful their early process, Federalists were dominating the national government…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federalists and Antifederalists fighting over the ratification of the Constitution brought great hardships for the newly emerging U.S. government and left behind two legacies that would cause conflict for years to come. Both of these groups came from very different social and economic backgrounds. The Federalists were advocates for the ratification of the Constitution while the Antifederalists were advocates for the Articles of Confederation. These parties paved the road for two legacies that…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays