Preview

Federal Supremacy In The States

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
956 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federal Supremacy In The States
The debate of states’ rights versus federal supremacy is one that affects America today and has since the country was founded. It started with the writing of the Constitution in 1787 and the formation of Federalists and Anti-Federalists, who had opposing views on the document. The two major arguments were that a strong central government would eventually become tyrannical, and that a strong central government was needed for the nation to move forward. Years of conflict between the two sides occurred, over what form of government was best and what rights should be given to the states and government. continuing until the end of the Civil War when the power of the Federal government was finally cemented. The Constitution was written in 1787, …show more content…
Different methods were used to decide if slavery would be legal in a territory, such as the Compromise of 1850 to balance the slave and free states, or the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which implemented “popular sovereignty” and allowed people to vote on the issue of slavery themselves. However, proslavery Southerners found this to be unconstitutional. They believed outlawing slavery in any territory by the government couldn’t be done and it was a choice of the states to decide if it would be allowed or not. This disagreement between the southern states and the North contributed to the secession of the South. The 1860 South Carolina Declaration of Causes of Secession states, “The people of the State of South Carolina… declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union.” This shows what role states’ rights played in secession. The Civil War would later break out and bring the South back to the union after their loss, when the federal government would establish control once …show more content…
The writing of the Constitution, which the United States still operates under, was an important point in this dispute but did not end it. It was only the beginning, as the topic was sparked once more over slavery and territorial expansion. Because slavery wasn’t legal in the North and most people were loyal to the federal government, it wasn’t an issue. In the South, many people felt their way of life was threatened. Over the years the arguments turned into secession, where the Confederacy built their government to reflect their beliefs on slavery and wrote as much in their new Constitution. In the North, it was never referred to as a separate nation, showing the ultimate goal to reunite the union. This did happen when the South was defeated, slavery was officially outlawed in the United States, and powers were given back to the Federal Government as written in the US

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Civil War-Causes.

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1782 Americans won their independence from Britain in the American Revolution. After the colonies won their independence, Americans created the Constitution. Its purpose was to replace the Articles of Confederation and solve its problems and more importantly to bring the states together under a single document creating a stronger union of all the states. There was one problem though: there were a few fundamental issues that the framers could not agree on. These issues included slavery and state vs. federal power. Since the framers could not agree they compromised, leaving these issues unresolved. The Union was formed with the Constitution, which was supposed to unite the states but instead embodied its major divisions. With conflicting ideas about the provisions in the Constitution related to the issues of slavery and the power of states' governments vs. the national government the union split into rivaling sections ultimately leading to the Civil War.…

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southern Secession

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “If slavery must not expand in your mind, it’s settled, we as a state secede from the governing of the Union and join a greater power, the Confederacy. We will no longer be hampered in your hatred towards our way of living. ”…“Then be on your way, I shall not dabble in your cruel pro-slavery reasoning. Just bear the knowledge in mind, we are stronger as a whole.” The Missouri Compromise kept inevitable split of the Nation at bay when it prohibited slavery north of the parallel 3630’ north line. This was later repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which implemented idea of popular sovereignty. This led to “Bleeding Kansas.” “Border Ruffians,” who were pro-slavery and the voted in Kansas started “Bleeding Kansas” so Kansas would be admitted as a slave state although, Kansas wanted to become a free state. Following this vote, many violent out bursts within Kansas occurred, around 80 altogether were killed. About three months later, the Battle of Fort Sumter began the Civil War. Lincoln’s election, conflicting views of slavery and the lack of power within the Southern government led to the Southern states seceding from the Union in 1860 and 1861.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War Causes

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Another cause of the American Civil War was the fight for whether the government would value federal rights over states’ rights. Economic and Social differences caused the Northern States to view certain subjects differently than the Southern States. The South was also afraid that they would be outnumbered in Congressional representation and not properly exhibited. However, the Constitution allows each slave to be counted as three-fifths of a person for population count, which in turn gave the South the advantage when it came to representation. In 1857, the Dred Scott Decision declared the “freed” Negroes did not have citizenship. Northerners were very shaken by this and the South attempted to force them to return freed or runaway slaves to their owners. Not too long after, Abraham Lincoln, an anti-slavery Republican, was elected into presidency. He was convinced that slavery would never be allowed to be adopted in new territories and will ultimately be abolished. His victory ensured the South that they had drawn the short end of the stick. This sparked a fire in the South and they fell to their only other alternative. South Carolina published its “Declaration of the Causes of Secession.” They knew Abraham Lincoln was anti-slavery and believed he would give preferentiality to northern interests. His election resulted in the secession of eleven southern…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 when the Constitution was created it caused many people to start a grand debate. Of course, there were people that supported the constitution and people that were afraid of the constitution. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists created documents that are within the Constitution that have shaped United States political parties. The Federalists supported a strong central government because the Articles of Confederation didn’t have strong national power, and was very restrictive.A reason why The Federalist wanted to change the constitution was to add people’s opinion into the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists supported a strong state government because they believed that a strong national government would cause a monarch and they were afraid of who will have the power.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States constitution created a new type of government called federalism, which divided power between the states and the national government. But the proper balance of federalism has been debated throughout the history of the United States, Federalism, which signifies members of a group that are bond together with a governing representative head. Two time periods that there has been a debate on federalism was the Supreme Court under John Marshall in (1801- 1835) and the extension of slavery in (1820-1860).…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalism involves the sharing of powers between different levels of government. In the United States this relates to the government at national level (the federal government) and those at the level of the state. The United Kingdom is not a federal state instead it is a unitary state where power is held in one place (parliament). Federalism is the process of sharing power between a central government, in America’s case Washington, and the States. The US Constitution dictates what areas the Federal Government have control of and the areas that the States have control of. Amendment 10 of the Bill of Rights dictates that any area that is not a power of Congress, President or Supreme Court it is up to the States to decide. Dissimilarly to the UK, Britain has adopted the unitary system which means that there is just one main body of government as opposed to powers being distributed across the nation. Over time, federalism has adapted and changed and the theory of New Federalism was introduced after Nixon’s and Reagan’s administration and was further mentioned under George W. Bush’s presidency.…

    • 1456 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The election of Abraham Lincoln and the secession of the South led to the outbreak of the civil war. The civil war was the first revolutionary change in America. States' rights were a major issue during this time. Issues of power, different interpretations of the constitution, and banking issues led to many difficulties. South Carolina was the first state to secede from the Union. In South Carolina's Declaration of Causes, it was stated that "powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states" (Document A). The 10th amendment which limited the power of the federal government had acted as a backing for the secession of the South. Nowhere in the constitution did it say that the states had no right to secede from the Union. This secession from the union forever changed the country. Another major change that occurred after the civil war was the thirteenth amendment which abolished slavery. Even though the slaves had fought for the Union in the civil war, they were unable to take any political action and were still inferior as it is stated in document C. The fifteenth amendment granted the right to vote to all men no matter the race. It was argued that the "federal government has no right and has not attempted to dictate on the matter of suffrage to any state" (Document C). When blacks were given the right to vote, it was only somewhat successful. Many blacks did use their new…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the history of the United States, there have always been arguments over what power the state governments should have, and the powers the Federal Government should have. More recently there have been instances where the Federal Government was questionable in some of their actions. Today's Federal Government has too much power because issues such as gun control and healthcare would be better handled on the state level.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to understand the different eras of U.S. governmental history, one must first understand the history of the relationships between the federal government and state and local governments. The Constitution of the U.S. establishes a direct link between state governments and Congress. It gives Congress specific powers like declaring war and creating armies. The U.S. Constitution also bars states from performing acts that would undermine the federal government; some of those acts include making treaties, coining money, and making war. State governments can also create/destroy local governments. Federal, state, and local governments all interact with one another.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State power, popular sovereignty/federal power, and the Bill of Rights were all issues rooted to the ongoing debate of federal v. state powers, causing major riffs between the federalist and…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism in the United States has had several different concepts throughout our history. Dual federalism ran until around the Great Depression of the 1930s. Dual federalism has very distinct and rather clear lines of power for the national government as well as the state or local level of government. At times, it is referred to as “layered cake”. The national level very distinct and rule over much smaller, local, or state governments. There is a balance of power between the two, each maintains sovereignty that should not impact the other. Both national and state should work together, but still question the other to operate effetely. Dual federalism for This Nation seemed to cause more tension between the national and state levels than anything else. McCulloch v. Maryland is an early example of dual federalism. When the state of Maryland argues that the U.S. Constitution did not give the national government the power to make a National Bank since it was not an enumerated power and was unconstitutional. However, the court concluded that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and that if the end goal is legitimate than what the national government is trying to do is constitutional.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the U.S. Constitution being the longest written constitution throughout the whole world's history, there were many debates and arguments against it prior to its indoctrination (Wallace, 2015). Anti-Federalist mainly preferred small government tactics of the Democratic-Republic (Schultz, 2016). In contrast, the Federalist believed that its current government was too weak to enforce its laws under the Articles of Confederation (Wallace, 2015). In return, this brought about the Federalist fight for a stronger central government. Also, Federalist wanted to develop a first-class industrialist country that distributed throughout the whole world to other economies (Schultz, 2016). Federalist argued that a large, diverse, and populated country…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dual Federalism, from 1789 to 1865, divides nation power into two parts delegated to state governments and federal government accordingly. In agreement, they were not at liberty to interfere with each other. Politicians supported advocating a boundary between federal government and state government. As they proclaimed, “Remain independent from each other, and enjoy supremacy in their own areas of jurisdiction”. Of primary importance in dual federalism is states' rights, which reserve to the states all rights not specifically conferred on the national government by the…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Government Restrictions

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States has experienced several different struggles as history shows us. The first was Dual Federalism. This period of time ran from 1790’s to 1930 where the powers that separated the federal and state governments were clearly stated as enumerated powers. (Federalism:US v The States) What we know today is new federalism. This period began in 1981 and continues today, were we see the states obtaining more and more power from the federal government. (Federalism:US v The States) The gaining of powers by the states also increases the difficult of states to maintain and comply with the powers and mandate’s they have received. (Federalism:US v The States) These conflicts are occurring more and more, for example, in 2015, an Alabama Chief Justice order the complete disregard of the federal courts decision to allow gay marriage in the states. (Palazzolo, 2015) Basically, a federal judgement was given that the states could not ban same-sex marriage, then a state judge made the decision that the federal government has no power to determine what the states can do. This is a good example of what the entire system was set up to limit the powers of each and every part of government, from the federal level to the…

    • 1574 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    federalism and rights

    • 642 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The concept of federalism is a system of government in which sovereignty is constitutionally divided between the federal government and the states (a packet of readings for URPA 5309, 2014-2015, p.1). As federalism is defined in many shapes and sizes, but basic principles of being a citizen has allegiance to more than one level of government. For example, in the United States, one is a citizen of both state and nation. “Do the states tend to promote individual liberty, or to undermine it?” The debate under a formal federalism as a constitutional system yields to specifics some of the advantages and some of the disadvantages.…

    • 642 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays