Preview

Feared Leader In Machiavelli's The Prince

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1211 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Feared Leader In Machiavelli's The Prince
The question of whether to be a loved or feared leader can make a person question on which viable choice is the most suitable for a leader. The Prince, written by 14th century Italian writer Niccoli Machiavelli answers this question (in chapter 17), the concept of whether to be feared or love is answered by Machiavelli, and that is fear. The answer of why fear is the better option is detailed as a set of guidelines which come in the form of authority, public emotion, and logical reasoning, stated by Machiavelli that to be a good (not a kind one) must be both ruthless but reasonable. A ruler cannot be too kind, less they be taken advantage of or to cruel, and be killed for punishing those that follow them, to become a good ruler they have to …show more content…
Public (reaction) opinions of leaders is vital as this can choose how effective their rule is, being lenient on those who commit crimes or showing off compassion here and there can make those who follow to simply disobey them knowing that any consequences they do will not be met with harsh punishment. As an example of what it is to be an effective “ruler”, people of authority, like one’s own parents can have this effect of balance between “cruelty” and clemency. For example if a child disobeys their parents for stealing things, the parent can remove their privileges and “fear related to a threatening request” (Smith, Martin, McMahon, and Nursten 660) can …show more content…
It only requires that one’s awareness of the risk of apprehension and punishment suffices to induce one to obey.
The fear of getting caught or what’s to come is what makes people to become obedient, not the punishment itself (kavka 603). While Machiavelli says that any ruler must rule by dishing out punishment, and that will gain for people to obey their rule, it’s the fear of what a ruler might do for insubordination. The question of it is whether to be fear or to be loved is answered in chapter 17 of The Prince; the effectiveness of instilling fear into a rulers subject can greatly allow the m to rule unopposed, solidifying their rule. As punishment and death are often connected when being an effective ruler it is a way to ensure people to obey. Obedience of that nature comes by dread of any punishment given to them for disobeying their rulers law and what will happen towards them. Although being a cruel leader is the best option to rule others, hatred tends to arise with those under a ruler’s leadership leading to rebellion, assassinations, or even death for the ruling person. While kindness may always be seen as the moral option to become a good ruler,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A good leader is one who can stand up against the norm and take risks to uphold their state. According to Machiavelli, in his book The Prince, this includes taking actions that are not favored by the majority. Though Machiavelli was born on May 3rd, 1469 and only wrote his book in 1513, his ideas were so significant that they apply even to contemporary leaders. Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, is facing situations that can either prove her strength as a leader or set the European Union on a road to destruction. On top of dealing with the major Greek debt crisis, she has been faced with the task of deciding how to handle the Syrian refugees. Using the examples and analysis provided by Machiavelli, Merkel’s best plan would be to pressure…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a significant analysis of Niccolo Machiavelli’s book The Prince. This book explores multiple concepts on leadership and governance for a Prince to legislate on his road to success. Therefore, I will bring a compelling conclusion on how Russian President Vladimir Putin is a modern Machiavelli. To get a full understanding towards Niccolo Machiavelli’s political theory, we must first examine what’s managed to inspire his view of an ideal government. In the book, The Prince, Machiavelli introduces insightful claims on how the Roman Empire’s legitimacy brought a secure and stable society. In fact, presenting the Roman Empire’s platform helped the reader to thoroughly understand Machiavelli’s political theory regarding governance and the…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In The Prince, Machiavelli states that it is better to be hated then loved as a leader. I disagree with him, and say that it is much better to be loved then hated. There are certain people, like Alexander the Great and Caesar who were loved when they ruled, there is human nature that affects the way people respond to things, and how a prince treats his people.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Niccolỏ Machiavelli’s lifetime, Italy’s city-states were in turmoil, and he was extremely interested in the politics behind the chaos.1 Machiavelli advised principalities on the proper way to conduct themselves by using his study of human nature. His understanding of human greed, disloyalty, and predictability created a vision of politics that utilizes power for a prince to maintain stability. Machiavelli created power-politics, his vision of how to stabilize a principality, in The Prince.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Organizational Control

    • 4526 Words
    • 19 Pages

    A leader with coercive power has control over punishments; people comply to avoid those punishments.…

    • 4526 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli: the Prince

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Virtue 1: Machiavelli, in dedicating the work to Lorenzo de' Medici, reminds the young prince that greatness awaits him because he is endowed with both fortune and admirable qualities. Machiavelli uses the term "virtue" to describe the positive qualities of a prince. In Daniel Donno's notes, he writes that virtue is a word which "implies physical and mental capacity-intelligence, skill, courage, vigor-in short, all those personal qualities that are needed for attainment of one's own ends." (p. 125) The last part is an important qualifier because virtue is very much related to getting end results. Virtue, in the Machiavellian sense, does not carry a moral tone.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book The Prince, Machiavelli presents a theory asserting that man needs a powerful leader in order to be successful. Machiavelli felt that a Prince must act in a way that guaranteed stability and order. However, his emphasis on political convenience was not in the service of the individual power of a Prince, but in allowing that Prince to do what was necessary for the sake of the people. He argues that as a leader, one has the duty to be dishonest or otherwise deceive its people in times of need. This is further clarified when he addresses the question of whether it is better to be feared or loved.…

    • 841 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    places the author at the mercy of the reader and prepares them to hear an idea…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's The Prince

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Phil: “What would you do if you were stuck in one place and every day was exactly the same, and nothing you did mattered? Ralph: “That about sums it up for me.” I believe “that about sums it up for everyone,” and if it doesn’t then he or she is just simply kidding themselves. As bleak and austere as that may sound, it is undoubtedly true. The situation of Phil Connors is not just an interpretation of a repetitive bland life. It is an illustration of a major philosophical idea, if not the biggest one at that. The idea that we weren’t put on earth for a concrete purpose, and there is no ultimate objective…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli's the Prince

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "The state is the highest achievement of man, a progressive and elaborate creation of his free will. The individual, the leader, the people, cooperate in maintaining it." This idea of state was put forth by Niccolo Machiavelli in The Prince, which was in essence a ruler's handbook to governing and maintaining his land. Machiavelli conjured his theories for government by basing his ideas in his belief that men, especially men in power, tend to follow the same directions, and therefore by looking at past leaders and their follies we can better determine how to run a state. "Men are always the same and are animated by the same passions that lead them fatally to the same decisions, acts, an results…. That one can foresee the course of political development by mediating upon the cycles and phases of historical events, and that essential to a statesman is not only the experience of modern events and constant study of the past. But also the ability to exploit this knowledge in actual political actions."…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The abstract need for ultimate power causes the unempathetic control because it perpetuates the idea that when ultimate power is achieved, the dominating faction is able to freely commit transgressions against the suppressed. In Beloved, one can…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Milgram is a 20th century social psychologist who conducted research into social influence and persuasion. His experiments on obedience remain some of the most frequently cited and controversial in the history of the field. Brown, R. (1986), “Social psychologist Stanley Milgram researched the effect of authority on obedience. He concluded people obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative--even when acting against their own better judgment and desires.”…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays