Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

fdshk

Good Essays
710 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
fdshk
I really want to read that Macbeth Essay. So I have to write stuff, erm... Ya I know this sucks... I'm just writing what's off the top of my head because I don't want to put an essay of my own on here. Cheese and stuff... and the the Russian Revolution: • After defeat by Japan in 1905, and the Revolution of 1905, Russia was unprepared militarily and technologically for the total war of World War I. Russia had no competent military leaders.
• Czar Nicholas II took charge even though he had a lack of ability and training.
• Russia industry was unable to produce the weapons needed for the army.
• Russia suffered incredible losses
• Autocratic ruler, Czar Nicholas II relied on the army and bureaucracy to hold up his regime. Nicholas II was further cut off when Grigory Rasputin started to influence his wife, Alexandra
• Alexandra made all of the important decisions after consulting with Rasputin.
• Rasputin often interfered with government affairs
• Russian people grew more and more upset with the czarist regime after series of military and economic disasters. They assassinated Rasputin in December 1916.
• February (March) Revolution: working-class women led a series of strikes in Petrograd helping to change Russian history. Inflation
• The Duma established the provisional government, which consisted mainly of middle-class Duma representatives.
• Czar Nicholas II abdicated (Stepped down)
• The Provisional government, led by Aleksander Kerensky, decided to stay in World War I; huge mistake; satisfied neither the workers nor the peasants who wanted to end the war.
• Bolsheviks became a party dedicated to violent revolution. Lenin believed that only violent revolution could destroy the capitalist system.
• Lenin’s arrival in Russia opened up a new stage of the Russian Revolution. Lenin maintained that the soviet of soldiers, workers, and peasants were ready-made instruments of power. He believed that the Bolsheviks should work toward gaining control of these groups and then use them to overthrow the provisional government.
• The Bolsheviks reflected the discontent of the people. They promised an end to the war. They also promised to redistribute all land to the peasants, to transfer factories and industries from capitalists to committees of workers, and to transfer government power from the provisional government to the soviets.
• On March 3, 1918, Lenin signed the Treat of Brest-Litovsk with Germany and gave up eastern Poland, Ukraine, Finland, and the Baltic provinces.
• Many people were opposed to the new Bolshevik (Communist) government. These people not only included groups loyal to the czar but also liberal and anti-Leninist socialists.
• The Allies sent thousands of troops to various parts of Russia in the hope of bringing Russia back into the war. They gave material aid to anti-Communist forces.
• The Communist, or Red, Army fought on many fronts against these opponents.
• The first serious threat to the Communists came from Siberia. An anti-Communist, or White, force attacked and advanced almost to the Volga River before being stopped.
• The Communist regime regained control over the independent nationalist governments in Georgia, Russian Armenia, and Azerbaijan.
• The royal family was another victim of the civil war. After the czar abdicated, he, his wife, and their five children had been held as prisoners. Members of the local soviet murdered the czar and his family and burned their bodies in a nearby mine shaft.
• Lenin and the Communists triumphed in the civil war over such overwhelming forces because the Red Army was a well-disciplined fighting force; because the organizational genius of Leon Trotsky. Trotsky reinstated the raft and insisted on rigid discipline. Soldier who deserted or refused to obey orders were executed on the spot. Also, the disunity of the anti-Communist forces weakened their efforts. Also, Communist revolutionary terror helped them win. A new Red secret police–known as the Cheka–began a Red Terror. Aimed at destroying all those who opposed the new regime, the Red Terror added an element of fear to the Communist regime. Lastly, foreign armies on Russian soil enabled the Communists to appeal to the powerful force of Russian patriotism.
• By 1921, the Communists were in total command of Russia. The Communist regime had transformed Russia into a centralized state dominate by a single party.
• The state was also largely hostile to the Allied Powers, because the Allies had tried to help the Communists’ enemies in the civil war.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1905, Nicholas made himself Commander of the Russian Military and left Petrograd for his new military headquarters on the war front. Because he had left, the Tsarina Alexandra was left to rule. Her most trusted advisor was a faith healer called Grigori Rasputin. Because of him, Alexandra became very paranoid and appointed and dismissed government officials at her own personal choice. Russia had 4 different Prime Ministers who were appointed in 16 months and their policies all varied from repressive to oppressive. Rasputin was murdered in 1916 by some of his opponents, and Alexandra who was left alone to rule tightened her grip on authority over the Russian people.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the rejection of the title by his brother Grand Duke Michael, Russian politics was thrown into turmoil with a system of Dual power, shared between the Provisional Government and the Soviets. This was essentially a struggle…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Czar Nicholas turned to the army to restore order. When it could not, he decided to return to the capital to deal with the crisis. However, the Duma knew what had to be done. Duma members met the czar’s train as it neared the city. They told Nicholas that the only way to restore order was for him to step down as czar. He tried to abdicate, or formally give up power, in favor of his brother, Mikhail.When Mikhail refused to take the throne, Russia’s monarchy came to an end.…

    • 4038 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore he decided to take matters into his own hands by becoming Commander in Chief . He thought that his tactics,maneouvering and royal presence would win Russia the war . Unfortunately this did not go as planned, and Russia was defeated. Although they had lost the war , Nicholas as a leader had stepped up and tried to make his country victorious . It was his lack of military experience that had devasted the Russian army , not a weakness in his character .Nevertheless, Russian citizens seen this as another failure in their leader, as they suffered more losses than any other country.This damaged Russias morale.The people had ,had…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - Concerned with frontiers and borders, protect territory; (surrounded by Turkey, Iran, China, NK) – brought into conflict with other nations.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian Communist Party first emerged under the Bolsheviks in 1905 when general strikes were organised in St. Petersburg and Moscow. At this time the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, were a minority group and increasingly divided from the Mensheviks over pace of reform and ideology. It was due to the Tsar’s ignorance throughout World War One that the Bolshevik saw an inadvertent increase in influence of opposing groups. Although, the Bolsheviks were not in power by 1917 their membership was increasing and it was Lenin’s simple slogans, such as ‘Peace, Bread, Land’ that attracted the Russian population, increasing Bolshevik influence. The fact that the Bolsheviks were the only party to promise an end to the war won the ‘hearts and minds’ of the Russian people, which could be argued that Lenin was the most significant individual in the changing influence of the Russian Communist Party. However, it was both the leadership from Lenin and military organisation from Trotsky that meant the October revolution of 1917 was, to a certain extent, a success. Darby argues that ‘Without [Lenin] it is unlikely that the Bolsheviks would have taken power in October’ whilst Figes claims ‘Trotsky became its principal source of public inspiration’. Post the October revolution, the Bolsheviks were a majority in the second All-Russian Congress of Soviets, proving that they had managed to exert a large amount of influence on the Russian population. After this it is more difficult to assess whether it was certain individuals that played a part in the changing influence of the Russian Communist Party as in the summer of 1918 Lenin set up a one-party state and ended the Constituent Assembly. The introduction of the NEP, in 1921, increased party influence as the peasants were allowed a little capitalism back, ending grain requisitioning and armed resistance in the countryside. It is hard to evaluate…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Nicolas II made the terrible mistake of taking over the running of the war, he not only damaged his own reputation by being forced to take the blame for the defeats, but he also put the Tsarina in charge. The Tsarina proved to be intolerant of the Duma and it appeared to everybody else that Rasputin was running the country, this idea was likely inspired by the leaked and probably altered letters from the Tsarina to…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nicholas Romanov was appointed as Tsar of Russia in 1894 and during his rule his fatal flaw was to address the concerns of Russia. Tsar Nicholas II was a conservative leader and possessed few of the skills that were vital to effectively rule the huge Russian population. He ruled Russia as an autocrat with his fantasy of absolute power rather than…

    • 2194 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Russia had no competent military leaders: Czar Nicholas II insisted on taking charge of the armed forces despite his lack of training…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The war temporarily brought an end to the industrial unrest in Russia that started in 1904. However, later it returned. The war also brought Nicholas II political benefits. Russia stood behind him. Well, they stood behind him until things got increasingly difficult and downright unpleasant. The war was not going the direction that Nicholas II had expected. In 1915, Nicholas II was so dissatisfied with the Army’s conduct of war, that…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay I will analyse a combination of reasons on how the Bolsheviks came to power and discuss events such as the February and October revolutions, the fall of the Tsarist rule and the Provisional government.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Royal Romanov Family

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The assassination of Russia's Royal Family was the result of political factors, which led not only to the death of the Tsar, but also to the collapse of the Russian Empire. Nicholas II could have prevented the various reforms he undertook by just concentrating on his country and the best way to develop it. His involvement in imperialism caused a lot of harm to the country, which directly affected the country's economy. Additionally, his resignation as the Tsar of Russia affected him because powers that belonged to him were transferred to the Duma, which made him less…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas was an autocrat that believed he had a divine right to rule- that he was chosen by god. He could, and did do whatever he wanted without consulting anyone.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays