Preview

Faverty V Mcdonald’s Restaurants of Oregon, Inc. and Gacioch V Stroh Brewery Co.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1194 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Faverty V Mcdonald’s Restaurants of Oregon, Inc. and Gacioch V Stroh Brewery Co.
Faverty v McDonald’s Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.
892 P.2D 703 (CT. APP. OR. 1995)
Facts: Matt Theurer was an 18 year old adult that worked at McDonald’s part time. His friends and family worried about him because he had many extra-curricular activities, worked for the National Guard, and worked for McDonalds. McDonald’s informal policy did not allow high school students to work more than one midnight shift per week or split shifts. There was a special clean-up week McDonald’s held, Theurer worked five nights. One night he worked until midnight, another until 11:30pm, two nights until 9pm, and another until 11pm. On Monday, April 4th, 1988, Theurer worked from 3:30 until 7:30pm, followed by the clean up shift beginning at midnight until 5am on April 5th, and then he worked another shift from 5am until 8:21am. During that shift, Theurer told his manager he was tired and asked to leave from his next regular shift. The manager accepted his request, and Theurer began to drive home. He was driving 45 miles per hour on a two lane road when he either fell asleep or became drowsy. Theurer crossed the dividing lane into on-coming traffic, and crashed into Frederic Faverty’s minivan. Theurer was killed and Faverty was seriously injured. Faverty settled his claims with Theurer’s estate, and then he filed suit against McDonald’s.
Procedure: The jury first found for Mr. Faverty. Then Faverty filed suit against McDonald’s, and McDonald’s appealed.
Issue: Is McDonald’s liable for the serious injuries done to Faverty?
Holding: Yes, McDonald’s is liable for the injuries done to Faverty.
Reasoning: Because Theurer had volunteered to work as many hours as he did, the evidence is insufficient to establish the defendant’s negligence as a matter of the law. Even assuming that Theurer had volunteered for his all-night shift, the evidence is still relevant to support the jury’s decision. The defendant concluded at trial if it had allowed someone to work that long



References: Jennings, M. M. (2009). Business: Its legal, ethical, and global environment. Mason: Cengage Learning.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In article “You Asked for it, You got it…Toy Yoda: Practical Jokes, Prizes and Contract Law” by Keith A. Rowley, the professor of the University of Nevada, is discussing a case of Berry v Gulf Coast Wings Inc.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was the pond a “trap” or extraordinarily dangerous enough to render it an “attractive nuisance” to children and thus create a negligent situation on the part of the land owner upon which the pond was placed?…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yunker V. Honeywell

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. The court in this case rejected the negligent hiring claim because of previous case law. In the Ponticas case of 1983, the court defined negligent hiring as, “predicated on the negligence of an employer in placing a person with knowing propensities, or propensities which should have been discovered by reasonable investigation, in an employment position in which, because of the circumstances of the employment, it should have been foreseeable that the hired individual posed a threat of injury to others” (McAdams, 2007, pg. 457). “Because of this definition under Ponticas, Honeywell argued that it should not be held liable for negligent hiring because, unlike providing a dangerous resident manager with a passkey, Landin’s employment did not enable him to commit the act of violence against Nesser” (McAdams, 2007, pg. 457).…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On May 22, 1996, two days after the incident, the plaintiff, who was not scheduled to work that day, returned to the restaurant curious to determine whether there was any hostility toward him resulting from his having called the Department of Health. The plaintiff testified that he was summarily ordered by David Badot, the restaurant’s manager, to come into his office and that Badot proceeded to shout at him while inquiring whether he had contacted the Department of Health. The plaintiff testified that he shouted back at Badot and acknowledged that he had indeed called Department of Health. Badot then accused the plaintiff of stealing one of the defendant’s softball team shirts and of taking a work schedule home.…

    • 757 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case Study

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The facts in this case are that Harvey Pierce ambushed and shot Robin Kerl and her fiancé David Jones in the parking lot of a Madison Wal-Mart where Kerl and Jones worked. Kerl was seriously injured in the shooting, and Jones was killed. Pierce, who was Kerl’s former boyfriend, then shot and killed himself. At the time of the shooting, Pierce was a work-release inmate at the Dane County jail who was employed at a nearby Arby’s restaurant operated by Dennis Rasmussen, INC. Pierce had left work without permission at the time of the attempted murder and murder/suicide. Kerl and Jones’ estate sued DRI and Arby’s, INC. As in pertinent to this appeal, the plaintiffs alleged that Arby’s is vicariously liable, as DRI’s negligent supervision of Pierce. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Arby’s, concluding that there was no basis for vicarious liability. The court appeals affirmed.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    English Law case

    • 270 Words
    • 1 Page

    Evidence presented during the arguments: McDonald told that his home was broken into 5 times and he recongized his own neighbor during the last burglary. Also his lawn was littered on by pople in the neighborhood.…

    • 270 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A fast food chain filed an action in the trial court to compel a town's building inspector to issue a building permit and to review the denial by the town's board of selectmen of the chain's application for a common victualler's license. All parties agreed that the chain was entitled to a building permit, but the trial court affirmed the decision that denied the application for a common victualler's license. The chain appealed. The court determined that there was no evidence that the board acted arbitrarily or capriciously in denying the license and there was no basis for disturbing the board's decision. The court also determined that the decision was not tainted by the participation of a member of the board who was employed by a competitor of the fast food chain.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good evening Your Honor, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, and opposing counsel. Tonight you heard the testimony and evidence in Roughed Grouse High School's attempt to hide, justify, and deny their negligent actions. In order to prove Roughed Grouse High School's negligence resulting in the death of Jordan Simon, I, along with my co-counsel, had to prove our case, not beyond a reasonable doubt, but simply by a preponderance of evidence. In other words, if you were to put the evidence favoring the case of the plaintiff and evidence favorable to the defendant on a scale, we the plaintiff would have to make the scales tip ever so slightly in our favor. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, we have done just that. We have proved to you tonight by a preponderance of evidence, not that the defendant was solely responsible for the unfortunate and untimely death of Jordan Simon, but that those representing Roughed Grouse High School were more negligent above all others involved.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The history of the case (Who won at trial court? Who won at the lower appellate level? Who won in this decision?)…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dillon V. Jogbra

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages

    References: Jennings, M. M. (2006). Business: Its legal, ethical, and global environment (7th Ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ultimately, the court did not see it Mrs. McCarty’s way. McCarty argued the judge should have granted her motion for judgment notwithstanding the jury’s verdict for the defendant. McCarty did not request the directed verdict on the issue of Pheasant Runs negligence which is a prerequisite to judgment n.o.v. Many accidents are neither the injurer nor the victims fault and therefore there is no liability. The judge advised Mrs. McCarty that the case was not as one sided as she believed it to be. Additionally, following a jury’s verdict, a judge cannot substitute its judgment when the judgment was reasonable (2). Mrs. McCarty did a poor job in proving that Pheasant Run could have prevented her attack with her advised precautions. Mrs. McCarty did not provide information of what it would cost Pheasant Run to equip the hotel rooms with improved locking systems…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since its creation in the late 18th century, the Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that impacted the course of history. The Supreme Court has a very important job, to interpret the constitution principles and make decisions based on these important standards. Had it not been for the rulings made by this court, many laws and precedents may not have been adapted. One case that had an exceptionally important impact on history was the case of Muller vs. Oregon. This case is one of the most influential decisions in Supreme Court history and its impacts are still seen even today.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1) CITATION: McDonald V. City of Chicago, III., 130 S. Ct. 3020- Supreme Court 2010…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Homework Assignment

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The judge erred in “refusing to allow the defendants to introduce evidence that no other employees were treated abusively…and in denying defendants’ requested jury charge on mitigation.” (McAdams 173) McAdams, T. Law, Business and Society, 10th Edition. McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions, 40848. .…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 week 2 work

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ms Liebeck spilled her coffee on herself which caused her to get burned. She sustained 3rd degree burns because the coffee was brewed at a higher temperature than other restaurants. The case was ruled in favor of Ms. Liebeck. The jury declared McDonald’s negligent because their coffee was found to be 20 degrees hotter than it should have been. McDonald’s had received many complaints about their coffee being too hot and failed to do anything about it. So their actions were considered to be reckless because they did not warn their customers about the temperature of the…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays