Food is everywhere. When people go to the market, they get what they enjoy. Sadly, what tastes yummy is normally not what is actually healthy for you. As bad as junk foods are, consumption is not decreasing and people are not getting the message. In a country that claims to value health, how can we display so many unhealthy, yet convenient, options? Taxing junk foods is a necessary choice that must be put into action if we are to help people’s health in the long run. It is no secret that junk foods are unhealthy. In order for obesity to even begin to decrease, limitations must be put in place in the form of a junk food tax. The purpose of this tax is to decrease consumption of unhealthy foods, generate billions of dollars annually which be designated for relevant causes, such as; improving diet, obesity prevention, and nutrition education.
Many nutritionist say that if the price of junk food rose, the consumption would fall. If you enforce a higher price on junk food it will cause some people to think twice about buying it therefore making them think about the types of foods they choose. Junk food causes society to be lazy with their choice of food. This is because it is usually cheap, fast and convenient and undeniably tasty. A tax on unhealthy foods would encourage people to choose healthier foods which leads to improved health and would help reduce related diseases. A fat tax would also encourage producers to supply foods lower in fat and sugar. It's a simple idea, if things are expensive enough, the cost becomes prohibitive enough that some people won’t buy them. One U.S. study, found a 35% tax on sugar-sweetened drinks — $0.45 per drink — led to a 26% decline in sales. people won't buy them.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Michael Moss wrote the essay, “The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Food”, to discuss the role that the food industry plays in America’s health crisis. He talks about the behind the scenes of the way junk food is manufactured, the science behind addictions to certain foods, and the rising numbers of obesity in both children and adults. It is important for Americans to have knowledge about the actions that companies are willing to take to protect their consumers.…
- 135 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Sacks, G., Veerman, J. L., Moodie, M. and Swinburn, B. (2011) ‘Traffic-light’ nutrition labelling and ‘junk-food’ tax: a modelled comparison of cost-effectiveness for obesity prevention. International Journal of Obesity, 35 (7) July, pp. 1001–1009.…
- 3179 Words
- 13 Pages
Best Essays -
One reason why there should be tax on sugary drinks is because it could encourage people to be healthy.One example why there should be tax onsugary drinks is because they could help with diabetes. They would be discouraged because there would be tax. Another reason why there should be tax on sugary drinks is according to the article”the wall street journal by Kelly Brownell’’ is because if people have medicare or medicaid is that if they don’t have a lot of money then they won't buy the sugary drinks. One more reason is because the long…
- 367 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the article,” Gap in Diet Quality Wealthiest and Poorest Americans Doubles, Study Finds,” by Tracie McMillan, and in Mark Bittman’s article, Is Junk Food Really Cheaper?” we see how food can be very expensive and this makes it harder to eat healthier. This is making Americans obese because people are eating fast food, which contains high sodium, calories, fats, and sugar. However, according to Bittman, it actually is cheaper to buy the food from a store instead of fast food. This homemade food is healthier.…
- 324 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The social institution of the government plays a key role in providing stability and safety for all the members of its society. When this institution comes into play with a fat tax, the question that is being raised is whether the fat tax will allow the government to fulfill its roles for the society, also known as its functional elements. With a fat tax in place, unhealthy foods would become more expensive, and lower income families would have even more financial distress. One reason that many children living under the poverty line are obese is that healthier foods are higher priced, such as fresh fruits and vegetables. This forces poorer families to choose the less expensive options, which include all the unhealthy food choices (Openchowski, par. 8). This is an unfortunate and unintended consequence of what is thought to be a beneficial action in the fight against obesity, so in this case the negative impact on the poor is the latent function, whereas the decrease in obesity is the manifest function, or the intended. With this as a consequence, most people would see the idea of a fat tax as a social cost for the society, and a failure in the government institution, as basic human needs are not being met. Sociologist would describe this as Social Disorganization, “where the social problem results from a rapid social change that disrupts the norms of society” (Larsen, “Understanding Social Problems/Structural Functional Perspective” 8). In society currently, the norms have switched from having home cooked meals to picking up food on the run to match peoples’ busy lifestyles. This has caused conflict in whether or not the government can tell people what or what not to eat by making unhealthy food more expensive. When it comes to what…
- 5716 Words
- 23 Pages
Best Essays -
However, stopping obesity can be easier if the government makes the prices for ingredients lower. By lowering the prices of ingredients, buying healthier foods will sound better than paying for unhealthy foods, and placing taxes on unhealthy foods will be easier in the future. Time consumption will be a slight problem with this, but there are food recipes that take 10-20 minutes to cook.…
- 742 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
More and more young people are experiencing hypertension and childhood obesity, and because of which are seemingly becoming more prone to various diseases (Should Government Tax Sugary Drinks?). Many take a stand on the issue, as New York for example no longer allows the use of trans fats in their restaurants. Still the cost of unhealthy food has remained nearly the same, while the cost of a high yield diet has soared beyond that of the rate of inflation (Should Government Tax Sugary Drinks?). The idea has been presented that the government place a tax on unhealthy food, such as America’s favorite – soda pop! Various valid points have been made in relation to how this “sin” tax could help to benefit our financial deficit and better influence the people (A Tax That Invests in Our Health). Others object, saying that the tax is a form of discrimination, separating us about our assumed character and wellbeing (Does This Tax Make Me Look Fat?). Though the answer seems so clear to some at first how to go about imposing such taxes, it is important that the complexity of the situation is recognized to see if the tax would be effective enough to be worthwhile.…
- 754 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
We shouldn’t put a higher tax on junk food. It’s stupid to do that! People can eat what they want to eat, and it’s their problem if they get fat. If they abuse the “privilege” of eating unhealthy food, it’s their problem. We shouldn’t be worrying about what other people eat. You can’t change how someone lives their life. If they have lived for years one way then they will live that way for the rest of their life. There is no use in trying to change the way someone lives. How about we just leave the whole thing alone? It hasn’t been a problem in the past, so why is it such a problem now? If people want to live a certain way, then let them. It’s not our…
- 796 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
“In the U.S. obesity rates have risen from 14% in 1978 to 31% in 2000…according to WHO/FAO in 2001, chronic diseases resulting largely from poor diet contributed to 60% of the 56 million reported deaths worldwide” (Lang & Heasman 2004:53). Both Canadian and American citizens alike spend vast amounts of their money on food and a significant percentage of that money is spent on low-nutrition foods such as fast foods and processed foods. Being the cash cow that it is, the capitalist food system has provided the opportunity for corporations to profit numerous types of junk foods (fast & processed foods containing high sugar, salt, fat). According to Robert Albritton’s (2009:90) “Let Them Eat Junk,” he argues that “the consumption of junk foods…
- 941 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
There is controversy over whether or not people should stop eating junk food. In the article “New Study Reveals Junk Food Good for You,” Billy Bunting believe some types of sugary, fatty junk foods “are better for you than so-called healthy foods” (Bunting). Throughout the article, he accounts evidences to verify his argument that eating large doses of junk food is good and a key to a long and healthy life. In “New Study Reveals Junk Food Good for You,” Bunting accounts studies, action points, and seven “tips to enjoy eating junk food so that its benefits can be fully realized” (Bunting).…
- 568 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
It’s sad that we can’t do what’s best for our own health, but that’s sadly what it has come to. Therefore, the government needs to impose a soda tax. The soda tax debate has garnered big headlines in newspapers. It 's only fitting that the attention surrounding America 's obesity epidemic might come to rest on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs.) The nation 's penchant for soft drinks is on the rise; we now drink on average 50 gallons per person per year, about double the amount we drank in 1977. (The Soda Tax: Potential Weapon In America 's War Against Obsesity) Last year, in the New England Journal of Medicine, the directors of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Yale University 's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity…
- 291 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
From 1991 to 2000 the average weight of Americans increased by 8.5 pounds- not such a shocking detail. Higher taxes are imposed on healthy foods but not junk foods, making unhealthy foods easier and more convenient to obtain. With this kind of economic “strategy” obesity is to be expected. To encourage healthy eating, higher taxes should be imposed on soft drinks and junk food. This strategy will surely influence a better diet and put America back at number one.…
- 507 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The government needs to make regulations for the health safety of obese Americans by limiting super-sized sugary drinks in eateries. “Regulations make it easier for people to eat healthfully without having to think about it. They make the default choice the healthy choice” (“Food Politics”). Fast food industries biggest customers are children, they advertise unhealthy food by cartoons commercials on T.V. and they put toys inside their kid meals to get kids to pester their parents to buy it for them along with the buy of an unhealthy meal. default Some people will so become aware that the default choice is not as desirable, instead one might buy foods with trans fats, that are more desirable. Trans fat in foods are extremely important in a business to create a specific taste and texture in many foods that consumers find desirable, and without a desirable texture and taste to appeal to customers, businesses will lose customers and money. Government regulations are going to save more lives than they kill by increasing the health of today's…
- 1044 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
According to the Journal of the American Medical Association, approximately one-third of Americans are obese. There are several culprits to this alarming increase such as lack of exercise, failure to research nutrition information, and modality of convenience. Author of the book, “Fast Food Nation”, Eric Schlosser states the expenditure on fast food annually by Americans, has increased from six billion to 110 billion dollars in the span of approximately three decades. Schlosser correlates the increase of consumption to increase of Americans becoming obese. As mentioned earlier, fast food availability is only one aspect of the poor health epidemic. There are not enough valid grounds to prove the increase of obesity and diseases such as diabetes. The employees of the tobacco industry are not slipping cigarettes into the pockets of civilians forcibly. Similarly, these fast food corporations despite their sophisticated marketing are not completely directing individuals to consume their foods. Individuals have the freedom of choice and should be aware that their choices may lead to…
- 402 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
First of all Jen Kelaidis says that, “Two thirds of American adults are overweighed or obese, and The Center for Disease Control predict that nearly half will be obese by 2030” (qtd. The Week art. 240554 par 1). For example, in Mexico the parents make their children eat and eat and they become obese. Second, Jen Kelaidis says that, “Obesity rates in children have more than tripled in the past three decades” (qtd. The Week, art. 240554 par. 4). For example, everywhere you turn your head there is an obese child in Mexico. Also, Oliver Mytton says that, “In America a 20 percent tax and sugary beverages would reduce obesity levels by 3.5 percent” (qtd. The Week art. 240554 par. 11). For instance, parents let children eat junk food because it is cheaper. At last, The Archives Of International Medicine says that, “18 percent tax on pizza and sodas would cause the average American to lose 5 pounds per year” (qtd. The Week art. 240554 par.12). In conclusion it is better to put junk food taxes because it will make people healthier because of the price.…
- 358 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays