Topics: Supply chain management, Marketing, Fashion Pages: 14 (4764 words) Published: August 25, 2013
The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research Vol. 20, No. 1, February 2010, 165–173

Fast fashion: response to changes in the fashion industry
Vertica Bhardwaj* and Ann Fairhurst
Retail and Consumer Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, USA (Received June 2009; final version received October 2009) The fashion apparel industry has significantly evolved, particularly over the last 20 years. The changing dynamics of the fashion industry have forced retailers to desire low cost and flexibility in design, quality, and speed to market, key strategies to maintain a profitable position in the increasingly demanding market. This article reviews the literature on changes that have happened in the fashion apparel industry since the 1990s, highlighting the emergence of a concept of ‘throwaway’ or fast fashion. It describes fast fashion from a supplier as well as a consumer’s perspective, and draws attention to several potential research issues. Keywords: fast fashion; supplier; consumer; quick response; fashion season

The fashion apparel industry has significantly evolved, particularly over the last 20 years, when the boundaries of the industry started to expand (Djelic and Ainamo 1999). The changing dynamics of the fashion industry since then, such as the fading of mass production, increase in number of fashion seasons, and modified structural characteristics in the supply chain have forced retailers to desire low cost and flexibility in design, quality, delivery and speed to market (Doyle, Moore, and Morgan 2006). In addition to speed to market and design, marketing and capital investment have also been identified as the driving forces of competitiveness in the fashion apparel industry (Sinha 2006). Franks (2000) suggested ‘sense and respond’ as the key strategy to maintain a profitable position in the increasingly dynamic and demanding market. A key defining characteristic of rapid responsiveness and greater flexibility, in this context, is to maintain closer relationships between suppliers and buyers (Wheelright and Clark 1992). Looking at the basic structure of the fashion industry until the late 1980s, traditionally fashion apparel retailers used their capability of forecasting consumer demand and fashion trends (known as ready-to-wear) long before the actual time of consumption in order to compete in the market (Guercini 2001). However, recent years have seen fashion retailers compete with others by ensuring speed to market with their ability to provide rapidly the fashion trends revealed by fashion shows and runways. According to Taplin (1999), such retailers could be credited with the adoption of ‘quick fashion’ that is an outcome of an unplanned process on the reduced time gap between designing and consumption on a seasonal basis.

*Corresponding author. Email:
ISSN 0959-3969 print/ISSN 1466-4402 online Ó 2010 Taylor & Francis DOI: 10.1080/09593960903498300


V. Bhardwaj and A. Fairhurst

Today’s fashion market is highly competitive and the constant need to ‘refresh’ product ranges means that there is an inevitable move by many retailers to extend the number of ‘seasons’, that is, the frequency with which the entire merchandise within a store is changed. With the emergence of small collections of merchandise, fashion retailers are encouraging consumers to visit their stores more frequently with the idea of ‘Here Today, Gone Tomorrow’. This indicates a shorter life cycle and higher profit margins from the sale of fast selling merchandise, skipping the markdown process altogether (Sydney 2008). In addition, desire to have variety and instant gratification with price mavenism is motivating consumers to prefer retailers such as Zara and H&M (National Post 2009). Several studies have examined various aspects of the buyer-supplier relationship with quick or fast fashion, such as the apparel design process relative to quick response (Forza and...

References: Bailey, T. 2001. Organizational innovation in the apparel industry. Industrial Relations 32, no. 1: 30–48. Bailey, T., and T. Eicher. 1992. The North America Free Trade Agreement and the US apparel industry. Report prepared for the US Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Barnes, L., and G. Lea-Greenwood. 2006. Fast fashioning the supply chain: Shaping the research agenda. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 10, no. 3: 259–71. Birtwistle, G., and P. Freathey. 1998. More than just a name above the shop: A comparison of the branding strategies of two UK fashion retailers. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 26, no. 8: 318–23. Birtwistle, G., N. Siddhiqui, and S.S. Fiorito. 2003. Quick response: Perceptions of UK fashion retailers. Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 31, no. 2: 118–28. Brooks, J. 1979. A friendly product. New Yorker, November 12: 58–94. Bruce, M., L. Daly, and N. Towers. 2004. Lean or agile: A solution of supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry? International Journal of Operations and Production Management 24, no. 2: 151–70. Bruce, G., and L. Daly. 2006. Buyer behavior for fast fashion. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 10, no. 3: 329–44. Christopher, M., R. Lowson, and H. Peck. 2004. Creating agile supply chains in the fashion industry. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 32, no. 8: 367–76. Crewe, L., and E. Davenport. 1991. The puppet-show: Changing buyer-supplier relationships within clothing retailing. Transactions of the Institute for British Geogaphers 17, no. 2: 183–97. Djelic, M.-L., and A. Ainamo. 1999. The coevolution of new organizational forms in the fashion industry: A historical and comparative study of France, Italy, and the United States. Organizational Science 10, no. 5: 622–37. Donnellan, J. 1996. Merchandise buying and management. New York: Fairchild Publications. Doyle, S.A., C.M. Moore, and L. Morgan. 2006. Supplier management in fast moving fashion retailing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 10, no. 3: 272–81. Ethical Style. 2009. The surprising top ten buyers of organic cotton. tag/fast-fashion/ Fernie, J., and N. Azuma. 2004. The changing nature of Japanese fashion: Can quick response improve supply chain efficiency? European Journal of Marketing 38, no. 7: 749–69. Fernie, J., and L. Sparks. 1998. Logistics and retail management, insights into current practice and trends from leading experts. London: Kogan Page. Fiorito, S., E. May, and K. Straughne. 1995. Quick response in retailing: Components and implementation. International Journal of Retail and Distribution 23, no. 5: 12–21. Forza, C., and A. Vinelli. 1996. An analytical scheme for the change of the apparel design process towards quick response. International Journal of Clothing 8, no. 4: 28–43. Franks, J. 2000. Supply chain innovation. Work Study 49, no. 4: 152–6. Gereffi, G. 1999. International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics 48, no. 1: 37–70. Guercini, S. 2001. Relation between branding and growth of the firm in new quick fashion formulas: Analysis of an Italian case. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 5, no. 1: 69–79. Hayes, S.G., and N. Jones. 2006. Fast fashion: A financial snapshot. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 10, no. 3: 282–300. Hines, T. 2001. Globalization: An introduction to fashion markets and fashion marketing. In Fashion marketing: Contemporary issues, ed. T. Hines and M. Bruce, 121–32. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heineman. Hines, T., and M. Bruce. 2001. Fashion marketing-contemporary issues. Oxford: ButterworthHeinemann.
The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research
Hoffman, W. 2007. Logistics get trendy. Traffic World 271, no. 5: 15. Jackson, T. 2001. The process of fashion trend development leading to a season. In Fashion marketing: Contemporary issues, ed. T. Hines, and M. Bruce, 121–32. Chapter 7. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. Jones, J. 1995. Forces behind restructuring in US apparel retailing and its effect on the US apparel industry. Industry, Trade, and Technology Review, March: 23–30. Malone, S. 1998. Custom foot-falls into bankruptcy, but concept lives on, says founder. Footwear News 54, no. 23: 5. Malone, S. 1999. Making strides in mass customization. Women’s Wear Daily July: 12. National Post. 2009. Fast fashion. fast_fashion.html US Office of Technology Assessment. 1987. The US textile and apparel industry: A revolution in progress. Washington, DC: US government Printing Office. Perry, M., and A.S. Sohal. 2000. Quick response practices and technologies in developing supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 30, no. 7/8: 627–39. Richardson, J. 1996. Vertical integration and rapid response in fashion apparel. Organization Science 7, no. 4: 400–12. Sinha, P. 2001. The machanics of fashion. In Fashion marketing: Contemporary issues, ed. T. Hines and M. Bruce, 165–89. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. Sohal, A., M. Perry, and T. Pratt. 1998. Developing partnerships and networks: Learning for practices in Australia. Techovation 18, no. 4: 245–51. Sydney. 2008. Fast fashion is not a trend. fast-fashion-is-trend.html Sproles, G. 1979. Fashion: Consumer behaviour toward dress. Minneapolis: Burgess Publishing Company. Sproles, G., and L. Burns. 1994. Changing appearances: Understanding dress in contemporary society. New York: Fairchild Publications. Taplin, I.M. 1999. Continuity and change in the US apparel industry: A statistical profile. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 3, no. 4: 360–8. Taplin, I.M. 2006. Restructuring and reconfiguration: The EU textile and clothing industry adapts to change. European Business Review 18, no. 3: 172–86. The Economist. 2005. The future of fast fashion: Inditex. The Economist 375, no. 8431: 63. ¨ Tokatli, N., N. Wrigley, and O. Kizilgun. 2008. Shifting global supply networks and fast ¨ fashion: Made in Turkey for Marks & Spencer. Global Networks 8, no. 3: 261–80. Tyler, D., J. Heeley, and T. Bhamra. 2006. Supply chain influences on new product development in fashion clothing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 10, no. 3: 316–28. Wensley, R. 1999. The basics of marketing strategy. In The marketing book, ed. M.J. Baker. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. Wheelright, S., and K. Clark. 1992. Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. New York: The Free Press.
Copyright of International Review of Retail, Distribution & Consumer Research is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder 's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Learning from the Fashion Industry: a Structured Literature Review Essay
  • Essay about Zara: It for Fast Fashion
  • ZARA Fast Fashion Case Essay
  • Essay about Zara Fast Fashion
  • Zara: the Technology Giant of the Fashion World Essay
  • Fast Fashion Essay
  • H&M in Fast Fashion: Continued Success? Essay
  • Essay on Zara, Fast Fashion

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free