Jalen M. Brown
EDL 204: J
Instructor: Tiffany Williams
Democracy and Dialogue: Class and Education
In a recent study, investigating the effects of children, data has been recorded. The results showed that children from single parent households, were more independent, but less socially acclimated than those children who were raised by both parents, mom and dad. This essay will highlight the differences among the organization of families. It will also give insight as to how these structural differences affect the children of the prospective families’ educational performance. To explore this topic and to provide more depth, concepts of democracy and various forms of dialogue will be discussed.
Does the way in which a household is structured, lend to any implications for the children of that family? Indeed. The fact of the matter is that the formats between different types of household structures influences children to a great extent. The configuration of families has major influences on the way children communicate, behave, and learn. Before education and democracy is discussed, highlighting other effects on children from single-parents and dual-parents will be critical in giving reinforcement and an introduction to the effects that structural differences can have on a child’s learning. Dual-parenting
Having two parents, by far, has produced the most beneficial and most healthy effects on children. For any social class, a child having both his parents (preferably birth mom and dad) is ideal. “While dual-parenting is the rarest style of parenting, it is shown to have the best outcomes. In this system, a child has the maximum potential to learn from both parents” (Lerman, 1996). More than likely while one parent is working, the other can look after the child, take care of the home, and spend quality time with their child. It is also possible for both parents to work in this system and as a result bring in more income to financially stabilize the household.
Parents serve as role models for their young and have major influences on the way the child develops. Boys tend to follow the fathers’ ways. Boys model the protective nature, sports-watching and women-loving habits from the father figure. On the other hand, girls tend to showdown their mothers’ looks, socializing techniques, and inherit the mothers’ warm, lovable, vulnerable nature. Not only do boys learn from their father and girls learn from their mother, boys and girls learn from the opposite of each parent as well. For example, a boy learns to trust and develop deep compassion for others. While a girl may learn to protect herself from her dad.
One concern for children of two parents was their overall behavior. There are many records and studies that correlate two-parent’ restrictiveness to an increase of rebellion and defiance. Children might feel the need to rebel and act out when they are not given the basic freedom to grow, explore, and make their own reasonable decisions (Lerman, 1996). Dual-parenting indeed allows the most room for a child to grow up secure, healthy, and ready to tackle the world. It’s when children are given everything that they need, that they are most productive adults, even if all they are missing is another parent. Children who come from two-parents are more likely to have children and stay with their significant other (Lerman, 1996). Single-parenting
Because too often dual-parenting end in divorce or the parents weren’t together, the most common form of parenting is single-parenting or joint-parenting. For the sake of this discussion, only single-parenting will be mentioned. Raising children alone can sometimes be a struggle, even for a wealthy parent. Single parents have to assume the role of two vital influences over a child. “When a child grows up with only one parent, and if they live in an impoverished environment, it is easy to believe that the children may find it more difficult growing up”...
Cited: Blankenhorn, David, Steven Bayme, and Jean Bethke Elshtain. Rebuilding the Nest: A New Commitment to the American Family. Milwaukee, WI: Family Service America, 1990. Print.
Kruger, Sherri. "Top 10 Essential Family Values." Zen Family Habits. N.p., 2 Feb. 2010. Web. 05 May 2014. .
Lerman, R. (1996). The impact of the changing U.S. family structure on poverty and income inequality. Economica, 63, S119-S139; Thomas, A., & Sawhill, I. (2002). For richer for poorer: Marriage as an antipoverty strategy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21. 587-599.
Levin, Yuval. "Beyond the Welfare State Publications National Affairs." Beyond the Welfare State Publications National Affairs. Ethics and Public Policy Center, 25 Apr. 2011. Web. 12 May 2014. .
Manning, W., Smock, P., & Majumdar, D. (2000, November 11). The Relative Stability of Cohabiting and Marital Unions for Children. Presented at the National Council on Family Relations Conference, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document