The court favored my biological mother, Faith, over my dad. Even after being arrested two times for foolish actions such as drunk driving while my dad was still trying to get custody. During the custody battle Faith filed false charges against my dad saying that he had abused me while I was a baby and this was used against my dad during the battle. If it was my mother nothing would have happened. The police later found out it was a false report yet Faith still had full custody and my dad only had visitation rights. She was at the time doing a massive amount of drugs and drinking when I was in her care. My dad at no point did anything that would cause the courts to give Faith full custody. She had a tremendous amount of evidence against her to easily prove that she was not fit to be a mother my dad had nothing against him. The court's argument was that it would not be efficient or right to have me be away from Faith even on a nightly basis. After Faith continued to act like the imbecile she was by getting arrested multiple times may I remind you this is all still going on during the custody battle. My dad finally got joint custody after her idiotic actions. My dad was only given Monday-Friday morning and afternoons which my dad worked so basically my dad got to see me one day a week and Faith was given nights and weekends when my dad finally got joint custody by …show more content…
Men may not always seem the most neutering but classifying them as not being as good as a parent as a woman is wrong. A woman physically carrying and giving birth to a baby does not mean that the mother is right for whom the child should be with because some mothers are not fit for that position. A man can be as neutering to a child and the court system needs to remain unbiased. Look at facts not preconceived ideas of which gender is a better parent because both genders have their