Preview

Fall of the Roman Republic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
802 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fall of the Roman Republic
Fall of the Roman Republic

Joshua Williamson

Professor Waalkes

World Civilization I

19 March 2009

Williamson 1
A system where political officials were elected and advised by a wealthy aristocratic senate once prevailed in Rome. This system was known as the Republic of Rome (T&E 262). This passage will consist of information and contrasts made between the republic that once existed in Rome and information in the source passage, Tacitus on Corruption in the Early Roman Empire. Tacitus on Corruption in the Early Roman Empire refers to the dictatorship of Caesar Augustus (63 BC-14 AD) by aristocratic historian Cornelius Tacitus (56-120 AD) and their impact on the people and economy of Rome.
The Roman Republic got its start when the last Etruscan king was abolished along with the monarchy in 509 B.C. (T&E 262). Although most of the republic was controlled by rich, aristocratic leaders, Rome still prospered from it, rather than the monarchy. That includes both wealthy nobles, and commoners alike, but in the republic they had other social labels. The patricians, or wealthy aristocrats, were the individuals who elected the consuls. The plebeians, or common people, made up more of the population, but still didn’t make up as much of the senate as the patricians, and this caused social conflict. The senate consisted of aristocrats that had a vast knowledge of politics. The senate made most of the crucial decisions with acknowledgement over the consuls (T&E 262).
The Roman Constitution was written documentation of military and civil power given to two consuls that would serve one year terms. The Roman Constitution also entrusted a single individual to lead Rome as a dictator for six months when there was military tensions. Dictatorship will later be the downfall of the Rome. Even though there was still social conflict as mentioned earlier, the republic was still highly favored because it showed great public virtue (Waalkes’


Cited: Bentley, Jerry H and Herbert F. Ziegler. Traditions & Encounters. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2008. Grant, Michael. "Tacitus on Corruption in the Early Empire." Bentley, Jerry H and Herbert F. Ziegler. Traditions & Enounters. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977. 270. Waalkes, Mary. Dr. Waalkes ' Lecture. Classroom Lecture. March 2009.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    To What Degree Did the Battle of Actium Mark the Establishment of a Monarchy?
    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages

    To What Degree Did the Battle of Actium Mark the Establishment of a Monarchy?

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CCOT: Rome, Republic To Empire
    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    CCOT: Rome, Republic To Empire

    During the classical age, Rome transitioned from a republic to an empire. During this time Rome’s senate was weakened becoming nothing more than a meaningless place for debates. This was because Rome became an empire in which the emperor had absolute power. While the senate was weakened Rome still controlled trade throughout the Mediterranean. This was due to Rome’s victory over Carthage in the Punic Wars. As Rome changed from a republic to an empire one change was that the senate lost power…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Impact of the Senate and Significant Individuals in the Fall of the Roman Republic Between 78 - 49 Bc
    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Impact of the Senate and Significant Individuals in the Fall of the Roman Republic Between 78 - 49 Bc

    As Sallust stated, “Greed destroyed honor, honesty and taught men to be arrogant and cruel. Ambition made men false. Rome changed.” The Roman Republic was critically weakened between 78 and 49 BC. The underlying flaws within the structure of the Senate and the republic itself, political corruption and violence and the formation of the first triumvirate, which should not have been permitted under the democratic state, all contributed to its decline. Manipulating these decaying social and political conditions were significant individuals, who, despite the efforts of the senate, rose to prominence and power, which culminated in Civil war.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyze Similarities And Differences In Techniques Of Imperial Administration
    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyze Similarities And Differences In Techniques Of Imperial Administration

    The beginning for the direction of government and administration started with Julius Caesar wanting a centralized, imperial form of government. His plans did not span out with upset elite classes that led to his assassination. The elite men wanted to create a government that was not in their power, which led to conflict and chaos. Augustus, otherwise known as Octavian, ended the struggle and was the leader to start the imperial rule that was right for Rome. The government was disguised as a republic. Just as Caesar, Augustus ruled by centralizing political and military power. He preserved traditional republican offices and forms of government. Members of the Roman elite were also members of the government. Augustus accumulated vast power and took full responsibility for the important governmental functions. As a form of a bureaucracy, he was very careful to place individuals loyal to him…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Compare and Contrast Greece and Rome
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Greece and Rome

    The Romans began a republic which had a 2 consuls, a senate, assemblies, and officials. The consuls were similar to modern day presidents but stayed in office for only a year. The Senate led religious events and foreign policy. It also was in control of the revenue. Roman senate consisted of the wealthy men. The assemblies were created so the people other than the wealthy could have their say in the government. However the people in the assemblies had to be full citizen males, meaning no foreigners or slaves. Roman republic officials did have decent authority but there laws were made to ensure they did not get too much power, leaving more of it to the wealthy. Rome was also centralized, because of its location and saw many migrations and invasions, from Po River people and those in Sicily. At 44 B.C. Rome became an empire, led by an emperor, with senators, advisers, and of course the massive army. Over time, the Roman army became more and more powerful. When Romans would conquer and expand they would normally devastate that area. Eventually, Rome became a military monarchy. Rome then split its empire in two, having a emperor in the west, and another in the east.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Rome and Han china
    • 3772 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Rome and Han china

    1. Roman Republic: The period from 507 to 31 B.C.E., during which Rome was largely governed by the aristocratic Roman Senate.…

    • 3772 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    AP world history
    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    AP world history

    Rome: “republic” based on citizenship of free men; citizenship ensured loyalty to the state and brought taxes into the state treasury; emperor-dictators had to support the idea of the republic and pretend to follow what the Senate, council of elder wealthy men, decreed. Development of bureaucracy helped run empire.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Most Influential Impact in Roman Technology
    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Most Influential Impact in Roman Technology

    I think Rome was an Empire under the Republic. Differences were the forms of government. In the Republic the people had voting rights and would elect the officials, the Republic was a system based on the rule of law, and a cleverly balanced constitution that was not a written document, but consisted of an accord between the 3 elements, democracy, monarchy, and oligarchy. On the other hand the Empire or Principate, a system based on an emperor. One man had total, absolute power. In the republic there was a collective form of government; in the Principate it was a one man rule (Emperor). Both the Roman Republic and Roman Empire had periods of instability which ultimately caused their demise. Interestingly, each lasted for almost the same amount of time, so it would be difficult to ascertain one as more "successful" than the other. The Roman Republic controlled most of the Italian Peninsula and soon spread into the Mediterranean, they came in conflicts and things started getting hard. Although the dying republic was ruled for a short time by the famous triumvirate; it soon collapsed with the death of Crassus and Julius Caesar became the first Roman Emperor. The Empire itself lasted no longer than the Republic, but its territorial gains were considerably more extensive. The Empire extended to Britain in the West, and to the banks of the Rhine and Danube Rivers in the East. It encompassed vast numbers of people and thereby spread Roman culture throughout Western Europe. The empire was brought about largely by Caesar who was a man of the people and rose on a popularist platform of protecting the citizens rights against the greed of the senate and redistributing wealth.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change
    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Did Sparta Change

    As the age of the Greeks was coming to an end, a small kingdom in central Italy was gaining power and growing. During this time, Rome was not yet the Rome as we know it today. In 753 BCE the Kingdom of Rome was founded on a hill top right next to the Tiber River. This kingdom lasted for around 200 years until in 509 BCE when the people of Rome overthrew the king and created a republic. Like the Athenians, the Romans also showed pride in their participation in government. However unlike the Athenians the Romans set up a republic in which the people of Rome voted for representatives and those reps then discussed, voted and participated in the government. This in turn meant that political participation in Rome was less direct than it had been in their Greek counterparts but, this in no way stopped the Romans from participation in politics. The Romans believed in one very important virtue. This virtue was called gravitas and it represented the Roman’s seriousness and importance it put toward aspects of life, one of which was politics. The Romans felt that being involved in government was a civil duty that all Romans must know about it. The people of Rome felt this way because they did not want to revert back to the time when they were ruled by kings. Unfortunately the era of the republic began to fall as a cycle of violence ensued. Rome was in constant chaos at this time and as shown throughout…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Democratic Was The Roman Republic
    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Democratic Was The Roman Republic

    The Roman Republic was rather democratic.The Romans were the start of a democracy, and we include many of their ideas today in the United States. They were democratic because they had a constitution two important elements including legislation, and the right for citizens to vote. The Romans still use the same concept as the government does nowadays, such as the magistrates, senate, and assemblies. The assemblies job was to pass legislation, which is the most important reason that Romans were democratic.…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Economics and Roman Era
    • 3422 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Economics and Roman Era

    After dismantling Monarchy system, the two consuls constituted Roman republic incorporating influential upper class, rich land owners, and plebeians. Initially the republic was in control of aristocrats who had monarchy background. However, overtime constitutional amendments revoked their influence. New republic systems promoted new generation of aristocracy who were rich influential and powerful to influence highest authority “the senate”, they were traders and rich upper class. Though the senate was independent but not the senators, who were corrupt and made decisions favouring elite class and traders. In fact the foundation of the Republic was laid on the poverty and poor were buried under it. Rome’s 5% was privileged class, whereas, 95% lived in below…

    • 3422 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Rome Research Paper
    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ancient Rome Research Paper

    The upper house, Senate, was exclusively controlled by patricians, the upper class of Ancient Rome society. The lower house, the Centuriate Assembly, has a huge representation by the plebians even though it was still technically heavily influenced by the patricians. Similarly, our nation's policy making rests on the Senate and Congress, with both houses counteracting one another to ensure that not one house exercises greater power than the other. In addition, in modern United Stated, a well-established, well-organized government consisting of the judicial, executive and legislative branches provided checks and balance. Nevertheless, elitism was a prevalent phenomenon in the ruling class of Ancient Rome, much like the current American elite politicians yielding vast political power.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Western Roman Empire - the Rise & Fall
    • 2616 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Western Roman Empire - the Rise & Fall

    The Romans got rid of the last Etruscan king in 509 B.C.E. The republican constution had two consuls; military and civil. These consuls were elected by an assembly that was…

    • 2616 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why was the Roman Republic facing serious social and political instability by the early 1st Century BC?
    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why was the Roman Republic facing serious social and political instability by the early 1st Century BC?

    Class division and difficulties with the constitution were very closely related and a lot of problems with the constitution were caused by the class division between the plebeians and the patricians. They both caused a lot of problems and political and social instability. Patricians were the aristocracy of the Roman Republic. You had to earn 400,000 sesterces or more to be a patrician. The plebeians were the people. They made up the rest of the population and had many different levels of wealth within it. You could be well-to-do tradesmen or extremely poor and you would still be considered a plebeian. You could really notice the class division within the republic. Patricians and Plebeians had the right to vote. Only men with a Roman citizenship could vote; women, slaves and foreigners were not allowed. Out of everyone who could vote, the weight of your vote depended on your social class- the richer you were the more you vote counted for. So if a group of aristocrats were to group together then they could control the government by controlling who became consul. This meant that really only the rich could hope of becoming elected. Because the senate (a hugely influential advisory committee made up of ex-magistrates) was basically run by the aristocracy the plebs needed someone to express their views and to protest against laws they didn’t agree with. Tribunes were created for this role. They were plebs voted into act by the other plebs. The primary power of tribunes was that they could veto any official act of administration. This caused them to have many enemies as if used against the consuls legislations, the power of veto could be powerful and stop anything from…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Why Did The Roman Republic Controlled Their Government
    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Why Did The Roman Republic Controlled Their Government

    The Roman Republic did well in some ways they controlled their government, while in others they didn’t do so well. The Roman Republic established a republic, citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf in this type of government. The Roman Republic was a very advanced civilization. The Roman people elected Consuls, who ruled for a short period of time.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics