Preview

Fall 2012 Business Organizations

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
14332 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fall 2012 Business Organizations
AGENCY
Reciprocal Duties of Agent and Principal (20-39)
Community Counseling Service
Need for non-competition clause in contract – but must be careful not to violate public policy
What is the duty of a party to the firm when he is planning to leave but hasn’t yet left?
You cannot seek out firm’s clients while you are still working there
Hamburger
Did not solicit clients’ business while he was still their employ
Anderson Rule: categorical – fiduciary duty obliges the fiduciary to act in the best interests of his client or beneficiary and to refrain from self-interested behavior not specifically allowed by the employment contract.
Easterbrook and Fischel Rule: difficult to apply in practice – socially optimal fiduciary rules approximate the bargain that investors and agent would strike if they were able to dicker at no cost. (not a great rule because there are always transaction costs)
Limitations on the right to discharge
Foley
Must decide what the relationship between the parties is: independent contractor, employee, etc?
Cannot be fired for irrational reasons or for certain protected reasons (if employee)
Employees invest and rely, therefore they need protection
Alleged public policy: employees doing the right thing for their employer
Court says there is no public interest in helping a private employer
Employer’s interest ≠ public interest
Employer handbook can be used as evidence to prove it is not at-will employment
Tortious breach of good faith and fair dealing – Court says no, there would be no duty to mitigate for contract breaches, therefore it’s not a good idea
Duty to Creditors (39-49)
Blackburn
3P reasonably believed A was acting with the authority of P, P did nothing to discourage her belief
Sennot
All partners are agents for the principal, by default

PARTNERSHIP
Partnerships and other Non-Corporate Forms
GPs
An association of two or more people to carry on, as co-owners of a business for profit
A lot of litigation is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    GENERAL PARTNERSHIP: Two or more components/people come together to share a business. Each partner shares responsibility for P&L.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lit 1 Task 1a

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages

    is a business owned by two or more owners. In General partnerships each partner is fully active in the firm giving input in management and each partner is fully liable for the debts of the business.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For profit 1. Association of 2 or more persons Note that no person may be forced to be a partner of another person. Persons can be other entity types 2. Carrying on a business…

    • 1645 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    LIT1 Task 1

    • 1514 Words
    • 5 Pages

    General Partnership: A business owned and operated by two or more people that share gains and losses.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fin 331 Study Guide

    • 5260 Words
    • 22 Pages

    * Partnership- legal arrangement between two or more people who decide to do business together…

    • 5260 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fi515 Week One Mini Case

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Partnership: Business owned by two or more persons who are personal responsible for all its liabilities. The partners pay personal income tax on their share of these profits. Each partner has unlimited liabilities for all the business’s debts.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Badm 300 Exam 3 Study Guide

    • 3935 Words
    • 16 Pages

    j. The Agent has Fiduciary Obligations to the Principal; they must act in the Principal’s best interest…

    • 3935 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Accounting Chapter 1

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners of a business for profit.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Task 310-1.2-01-06

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A partnership is an agreement between friends or investors to open or assemble a business. The individuals within the partnership agree by signing the agreement that is registered to continue to supply capital, knowledge and skills as well as share in the profits of the company. Partnerships require more than one sole owner. By having multiple owners this will allow the organization or business to attain investor for support of the business and or individuals who are deemed as qualified.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bodyworks Case

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bodyworks’ non-compete clause satisfies the first four elements of enforceability but fails the fifth element because it is against “public policy.” In the early 1900’s, non-competition clauses were usually not upheld because these provisions were seen as a restraint of trade which was against public policy. See Mar-Hof Co. v. Rosenbacker, 97 S.E. 169 (N.C. 1918). North Carolina law says that “no contract or agreement hereafter made, limiting the rights of any person to do business anywhere in the State of North Carolina shall be enforceable unless such agreement is in writing duly signed by the party who agrees not to enter into any such business within such territory.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 75-4. Over time though, North Carolina courts became more open to non-compete provision, but the covenant had to satisfy a five-part test to determine if it was enforceable. United Labs., Inc. v. Kuykendall, 370 S.E.2d 375, 380 (N.C. 1988). It is enforceable if it is (1) in writing; (2) made part of a contract of employment; (3) based on valuable consideration; (4) reasonable both as to time and territory; and (5) not against public policy. Id. The fifth element, not against public policy, is met when it is intended to protect a “legitimate interest” of the covenantee and is not so broad as to be “oppressive to the covenantor or the public health”. Iredell Digestive Disease Clinic, P.A. v. Petrozza, 373 S.E.2d 449, 453 (N.C. Ct. App. 1988). If honoring the contract would create a substantial harm to the public health, “the public interests outweigh the contract interests of the covenantee, and the court…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stonebrook Case

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The common idea of good faith and fair dealing is normally used when there are technical excuses for a breach of contract or specific wording. This principle may be used in different occasions such as fraud (McClain v Octagon Plaza), question of fact (Shah v Cover-it, Inc), unfair and unjust enrichment (Stainbrook v Low) and occasions such as reciprocal duties (Smith v. City and County of San Francisco).…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Non Compete Clause

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In society today the "non-compete" clause has gained more and more publicity. In certain industries the non-compete clause is essential to protect employers investments in their personnel. A fine example of this is in the radio industry in Florida. In 1987, the Florida appeals court reexamined a case where disc jockeys had signed a letter of agreement with a rival station during the prohibition period of their non-compete agreement. The disc jockeys were not working at the time, but were receiving a monthly stipend from their new employer. The Appeals Court was to decide whether or not their "agreement" violated their original non-compete covenant and whether or not damages should be assessed.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Non-Compete

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages

    | A contract limiting a party from competing with a business after termination of employment or completion of a business sale.Found in some business contracts, noncompete agreements are designed to protect a business owner's investment by restricting potential competition. Generally, businesses pursue these agreements in two instances: when hiring new employees, or when purchasing an established business. The noncompete agreement is a form of Restrictive Covenant, a clause that adds limitations to the employment or sale contract. These agreements protect the business by restricting the other party from performing similar work for a specific period of time within a certain geographical area. First used in the nineteenth century, and common today in certain professions, noncompete agreements sometimes have an uncertain legal status. Courts do not always uphold them. Generally, courts evaluate such clauses for their reasonableness to determine whether they constitute an unfair restraint on trade.The rationale behind noncompete agreements is an employer's self-interest. Typically, companies invest heavily in the training of their employees. Similarly, they have an interest in protecting their customer base, trade secrets, and other information vital to their success. The noncompete agreement is a form of protection against losses. The company does not wish to invest in an employee only to see the employee take the skills acquired, or the company's customers, to another employer. Thus, when hiring a new employee, the company may make her sign a noncompete agreement as part of a condition of employment. Likewise, the prospective purchaser of an established business may only buy it if the current owner is willing to sign a noncompete agreement.In practice, such agreements are very specific in several respects. Usually the agreement will define a length of time, geographic radius in miles, and type of activity in which the employee promises to refrain from…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Noncomoetative Agreements

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A noncompetition agreement is a type of “restrictive covenant,” i.e., a promise by an employee not to engage in certain behavior that is contrary to the employer’s interests. A covenant “not to compete” generally is a promise that the employee will not engage in business competitive with the employer during and for a certain time period following termination of employment. Such covenants are often accompanied by covenants “not to solicit” the employer’s customers and covenants “not to disclose” the employer’s confidential business information. This is the agreement that I think employers should use.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Management Feasibility

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners, a business for profit. Art.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays