“Faith and reason often clash when considering belief in what is right and, consequently, how to proceed with one’s life.” This statement represents a false choice because properly understood faith is never without reason. Faith is based upon background experience and knowledge or “properly basic belief”. Properly basic beliefs are rational beliefs that do not depend on other things to justify them. To say that there is a split between faith and reason, represented through the idea of a tragic hero and the idea of a knight of faith, would be a false dichotomy. Faith is not the absence of reason.
If I were to define the tragic hero, it would be a person or a character that emerges as a hero “against all odds” but is destined for tragedy. Oedipus is a prime example of a classic tragic hero. He learns a prophecy that said he would eventually end up killing his father and marrying his own mother and tries to escape his fate. However, even after trying to escape the prophecy by fleeing his home, he ends up fighting in war, triumphing, but yet still manages to kill his father and marry his mother. So, no matter what, Oedipus was destined to fail nevertheless he was still looked upon as a hero. Now, a knight of faith can be described as a person who has assurance solely in himself and in God and who acts on his/her own accord. A good example of a knight of faith is Abraham. In the book of Genesis in the Holy Bible, God told Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac. Although Abraham loved his son dearly, he was willing to sacrifice his own son in order to obey God’s commands. Just as Abraham was about to sacrifice his son, God stopped him and sent him a lamb to sacrifice instead of his son and acknowledged him for his unfaltering faith.
While both of these heroes are indeed different, they do not represent the split of faith and reason because there is none. Faith and reason are not black and white; it is justified to believe in some things without proof. Oedipus...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document