Preview

Fahrenheit 451 Banned

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
467 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fahrenheit 451 Banned
The challenged book I recently read was Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury. This book has been challenged, and almost banned, for quite a while. I personally disagree with the statement that this book should be banned. This book has a very deep and meaningful background, and the good definitely outdoes the bad.

The people who chose to ban this book did have a point, that foul language and violence is not good for a young student to read, but the good in this book should cover up the bad. The foul language in this book was strictly two words, and they were nothing that most students in my school wouldn’t know. As along with the violence, there are video games and movies that have much more intense violence in them, and much younger people view
…show more content…
One of the things that were counted as violence in Fahrenheit 451 was the guard dog, referred to as the Hound, protecting the firefighter’s station. I don’t see this as being violence, but more as keeping things more safe. The other violent act they stated was Mildred, Montag’s wife, trying to commit suicide. Yes, this is a logical reason to ban this book, but this part also played a major role in the scene. This part was proving that Mildred was going crazy from all of the laws that were given to this community. Mildred couldn’t take it anymore, and she just so happened to take more pills than she needed. I do agree that this is a little excessive for young viewers, but I also agree that this was important to the book’s background.

The other reason that this book should be banned was going against religious beliefs. This statement did not make sense to me. I feel as if this book stays within the guidelines of religion, for the fact that they never stated anything that even related to religion. So, maybe the violence and the language were a little bit rough, but for the sake of religious background, this book should not be banned.

In the long run, the inspiring truth and the sad fate about this book should outdo the bad parts that this book may contain. Fahrenheit 451 used to be a book modern high school students had to read, and it still should be. This book puts you in a great mindset, and there is no reason for it to be banned out of student’s lives

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although this novel may offend some parents or kids, others enjoy this novel. If some do not approve they have the option too put it aside and not read it. Adults should not take the fun, adreniline rush, sappiness, etc., away from others. I do think that this novel should be read in High Schools because it shows what it means too be self-sufficient and it also portrays that if you really want soemthing then you have to work for it. This novel is very touching and has a good moral behind it. I think that banning this book is unfair to others. You should be able to read whatever you want, whenever you want. If others are offended they don’t have too read it and cans et it aside and leave it at that. I think that the novel was very interesting, it was also very well written. It made me think about my life more and how well I have it and how much I take it for…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter Sisario’s analysis of Fahrenheit 451 can be located on Gale literary databases. The analysis discusses the reasons for controversy the book had generated in North America. The source deconstructs the book specifically focusing on the allusions it contained; some of them from the Bible. The main reason for Fahrenheit 451 being banned is because of some of the allusions being used. Peter Sisario is a recognized critic for novels, being noted for his analysis of Fahrenheit 451 and 1984; ensuring that his view and analysis is academic and reliable. The original essay derives from the English Journal, which…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fahrenheit 451 is a great sci-fi classic that makes really makes you think about how society hinders, or will hinder free will. The book had a strong theme, good plot and clear character growth. However, there are still some cons that need to be considered. I would not recommend this book to anyone under the age of 13. I had a hard time understanding this book and…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However Fahrenheit 451 is a society you don’t want to live in. Books are illegal in there society. Fireman who are nothing like modern day fireman, burns yours houses because there could be hidden books. In modern day society you can have your books out in the open, reading whatever you want. Clearly, the novel is a dystopian society compared to the modern day society which…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bradbury stated that Fahrenheit 451 is not about censorship. In Fahrenheit 451, he tries to illustrate how television destroys the significance in literature. Television has replaced family, friendship, and the real idea of communication. Television screens take up entire walls, including several walls that communicate with the characters, in the novel. Also, Mildred calls the television show characters her family. People in the society speak with their friends through the digital wall. However, the digital wall is what is known as social media now days. In addition, people did not realize that their life is empty without books and that is one of the main reasons why everyone is sad and lost. On the other hand, even though people have access…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the flaws Bradbury points out in Fahrenheit 451 is censorship. Censorship occurred repeatedly throughout the course of history. The most apparent source of censorship in the novel is book burning. During World War II, Nazi Germany burnt many books as a form of censorship, one example is when “university students in 34 university towns across Germany burned over 25,000 books” (“Book Burnings” 1). Censorship is shown throughout the novel by books being burned and the job of the…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fahrenheit 451 shows us how censorship can go too far. In this novel, it is in the future where books, whether for knowledge or entertainment have been banned by the government. The government uses censorship of these mediums to control the public by limiting what kind of input the community has. This theme is shown by the settings, the characters, and with symbols.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Number one, as I said, quality of information. Number two: leisure to digest it. And number three: the right to carry out actions based on what we learn from the interaction of the first two,” (81). This quote kind of ties in what Beatty says in the previous quote because in the previous quote, Beatty talks about how people don’t have the time or patience to read a book. And in this quote, Faber is kind or explaining why people don’t really read books anymore, because you need to know what the books are talking about about, you need to be able to understand them, and you need to be able to use the information of the book or else there isn’t really any use with it. So it does make sense on why books are censored in Fahrenheit 451, because people don’t really care to go through all of these steps just to simply read a book, that is why they would rather take the shortcut and just know what its about rather than reading the whole…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Upon reading this book I was unable to understand why it was banned. I realized then that this book is no longer banned for that reason. Today’s society does not view the…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    All Information i have gotten about this book being banned all support the idea of this book being banned for a main character smoking and some different outlook on religion. Personally i think this is a horrible and no good reason to ban a book from schools where children can sit down and enjoy a book meant to show them an adventure. My personal opinion is that the only time a book should be taken away from people is if the…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you ever think that books that contain sex, obscene language, and immoral subjects could make a good book? The Catcher in the Rye is a prime example. The book has been on the banned reading list since the days following its publishing. The book was said to be “immoral and inappropriate that in 1960, a teacher in Tulsa, Oklahoma, was fired for assigning the book to an eleventh-grade English class.” (“Banned Book: The Catcher”) The Catcher in the Rye should be read in schools because it gives a crystal clear image on how the world contains sex, violence, and motifs of lying and deception.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Fahrenheit 451 not all reading material is banned. In that society the public it is only illegal to read books, and even then only real literature was banned. Remaining was comic books, play books and magazines. Real literature was claimed to be banned because it offended different people. “Colored people don’t like Little Black Sambo. Burn it. White people don’t like Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Burn it. Someone’s written a book on tobacco and cancer of the lungs? The cigarette people are weeping? Burn the book” (Bradbury 59). This part of the book makes the reader wonder if Captain Beatty knows that Montag stole one of the books at the fire the night before. It also makes the reader think did Beatty know that Montag has been collecting books from the houses the Firemen were called to. “I don’t think he knows which book I stole. But how do I chose a substitute? Do I turn in Mr. Jefferson? Mr. Thoreau? Which is least valuable? If I pick a substitute and Beatty does know which I stole, he’ll guess we’ve an entire library here”…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Catching Fire

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Banning Catching Fire by Suzanne Collins has good intentions—protecting children; however, children/teenagers should be trusted to make their own decisions about what they read. Books are usually challenged or banned to protect others, for example; violence, sexually explicit or offensive language. Catching fire is said to be challenged because of its violence, anti-ethnic, anti-family, insensitivity, and offensive language. The Hunger Games series was on the 2010 challenged books lists.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Catcher in the Rye was banned from the school book list between 1966 and 1975. It was banned from schools because it contains vulgarity, violence, and sexual content. Even though high school students are mature enough to handle the adult content that happens throughout, Some still try to ban the book. Books are banned because of the whole book or sometimes for even a single word. Parents try to protect their children from knowing the awful truth of the world, But is it really protecting them? No, children will eventually find out about sex and drinking from a bad influence, that could lead to a more dangerous situation. The Catcher in the Rye should not be banned because it is relatable to teens, it exposes to readers that in the world…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Books shouldnt be banned

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The First Amendment of the Constitution guarantees our right to free speech, which includes the right to read and write books that might be considered by some to be too violent, hateful, or offensive. Some people feel that schools, libraries, and governments should be the judge of what books are good. Others believe that kids or their parents should have the freedom to decide for themselves, and shouldn't have others' viewpoints imposed on them." How is an author supposed to do right to free speech if the people in charge can pick and choose what books they want kids to read? Banning books would take away from their right to free speech. The author's that is. They wrote the book expecting anybody to be able to read it. By banning a book you are taking away from what the first amendment was supposed to do. If a person wants to read the thoughts and mind of an author, they should have the right to, regardless if it's bad or not. I believe it's what best for them; we can't tell a child what is best for them if we haven't met them. Because this freedom is one of our rights as Americans, people feel that any form of censorship is wrong. Most people believe that people should be free to read whatever they choose. According to Carol Brey-Casiano, "Not every book is right for every person, but providing a wide range of reading choices is important for learning, and imagination. The abilities to read, speak,…

    • 940 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays