The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0953-4814.htm
Factors inﬂuencing organizational change efforts
An integrative investigation of change content, context, process and individual differences H. Jack Walker, Achilles A. Armenakis and Jeremy B. Bernerth Department of Management, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the integrative inﬂuence of content, context, process, and individual differences on organizational change efforts. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from employees involved in a recent de-merger. Using structural equation modeling, a hypothesized model that integrated individual differences with change content, context, and process factors was tested. Findings – Results led to the acceptance of a model indicating that change context mediated the relationship between individual differences and change process and content. Similarly, change content and process mediated the relationship between change context and organizational change commitment. Research limitations/implications – Owing to the nature of the study, inferences of causality cannot be made. Additionally, common method bias may be a concern because criterion and response variables were collected at the same time. Practical implications – An organization’s prior change history (i.e. context) has the potential to negatively inﬂuence change success. In order to counteract these effects, change agents should concentrate on clearly communicating the change details (i.e. process) to employees. Originality/value – This study is one of the ﬁrst to integrate factors common to all change efforts, i.e. content, context, process and individual differences. Further, it elaborates on how these factors interact to inﬂuence change success. Keywords Organizational change, Employee behaviour, Change management, Corporate communications Paper type Research paper
Integration of change factors
For over one-half century, researchers have attempted to provide insight into change dynamics and help organizations successfully implement change. Lewin (1947) argued that a successful change must involve three distinct phases: unfreezing, moving, and freezing. Building on the Lewinian phase model, several change researchers have described steps practitioners can employ in implementing organizational changes (Armenakis et al., 1999; Galpin, 1996; Judson, 1991; Kotter, 1995). However, adhering to the steps outlined in the aforementioned models does not necessarily guarantee organizational change success. Change agents must also be conscious of several factors speciﬁc to the changing organization. In a review of organizational change research conducted during the 1990s, Armenakis and Bedeian (1999) identiﬁed three factors common to all change efforts. Speciﬁcally, they reviewed research that involved content issues, contextual issues, and process issues. Research has focused on each of these factors on an individual basis, but little research exists integrating these
Journal of Organizational Change Management Vol. 20 No. 6, 2007 pp. 761-773 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited 0953-4814 DOI 10.1108/09534810710831000
change factors. In fact, Damonpour (1991) suggested that change success may ultimately be determined by the ﬁt between content, contextual, and process factors. Another factor that cannot be ignored in organizational change research is individual differences among the change agents and the change targets. Until recently, these topics received little attention in the change literature. Recognizing this absence, Bray (1994) called for an increase in organizational change research focusing on the micro-level factors inﬂuencing change success. Similarly, Judge et al. (1999, p. 107) suggested that change success may lie “within the psychological predispositions of individuals experiencing the...
References: Armenakis, A.A. and Bedeian, A.G. (1999), “Organizational change: a review of theory and research in the 1990s”, Journal of Management, Vol. 25, pp. 293-315. Armenakis, A.A., Harris, S.G. and Feild, H.S. (1999), “Making change permanent: a model for institutionalizing change interventions”, Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 12, pp. 97-128. Armenakis, A.A., Harris, S.G. and Mossholder, K.W. (1993), “Creating readiness for organizational change”, Human Relations, Vol. 46, pp. 681-703. Ashford, S.J. (1988), “Individual strategies for coping with stress during organizational transitions”, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 24, pp. 19-36. Atwater, L.E., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, D. and Cartier, P. (2000), “An upward feedback ﬁeld experiment: supervisors’ cynicism, reactions, and commitment to subordinates”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 53, pp. 275-97. Bentler, P.M. (1990), “Comparative ﬁt indexes in structural models”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 107, pp. 238-46. Bray, D.W. (1994), “Personnel-centered organizational diagnosis”, in Howard, A. et al. (Eds), Diagnosis for Organizational Change, Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp. 152-71. Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1991), “Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a uniﬁed view of working, learning, and innovation”, Organizational Science, Vol. 2, pp. 40-57. Budner, J. (1962), “Tolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable”, Journal of Personality, Vol. 30, pp. 29-40. Byrne, B.M. (2001), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Integration of change factors
Coch, L. and French, J. (1948), “Overcoming resistance to change”, Human Relations, Vol. 1, pp. 512-32. Damanpour, F. (1991), “Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 555-90. Frazier, P.A., Tix, A.P. and Barron, K.E. (2004), “Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research”, Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 115-34. Galpin, T. (1996), The Human Side of Change: A Practical Guide to Organization Redesign, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Haveman, H. (1992), “Between a rock and a hard place: organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 37, pp. 48-75. Herscovitch, L. and Meyer, J.P. (2002), “Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, pp. 474-87. Hinings, C.R. and Greenwood, R. (1988), The Dynamics of Strategic Change, Basil Blackwell, Oxford. Holmbeck, G.N. (1997), “Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 599-610. Hu, L-T. and Bentler, P.M. (1999), “Cutoff criteria for ﬁt indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives”, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 1-55. Joreskog, K.G. and Sorbom, D. (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. Judge, T.A., Thoreson, C.J., Pucik, V. and Welbourne, T.M. (1999), “Managerial coping with organizational change: a dispositional perspective”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84, pp. 107-22. Judson, A. (1991), Changing Behavior in Organizations: Minimizing Resistance to Change, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA. Kelly, P. and Amburgey, T. (1991), “Organizational inertia and momentum: a dynamic model of strategic change”, Academy of Management Journal, pp. 591-612. Kotter, J. (1995), “Leading change: why transformation efforts fail”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, pp. 59-67. Lewin, K. (1947), “Frontiers in group dynamics”, Human Relations, Vol. 1, pp. 5-41. McCrae, R.R. and Costa, P.T. (1986), “Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample”, Journal of Personality, Vol. 54, pp. 385-405. McLain, D. (1993), “The MSTAT-I: a new measure of an individual’s tolerance for ambiguity”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 53, pp. 183-9. Meyer, A., Brooks, G. and Goer, J. (1990), “Environmental jolts and industry revolutions: organizational responses to discontinuous change”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 93-110. Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H. (1984), Organizations: A Quantum View, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Nutt, P.C. (1986), “Tactics of implementation”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 29, pp. 230-61. Reger, R.K., Mullane, J.V., Gustafson, L.T. and DeMarie, S.M. (1994), “Creating earthquakes to change organizational mindsets”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 8, pp. 31-46.
Reichers, A.E., Wanous, J.P. and Austin, J.T. (1997), “Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 11, pp. 48-59. Rush, M.C., Schoel, W.A. and Barnard, S.M. (1995), “Psychological resilience in the public sector: “Hardiness” and pressure for change”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 46, pp. 17-39. Schneider, B. (1987), “The people make the place”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 40, pp. 437-53. Schweiger, D.M. and DeNisi, A.S. (1991), “Communication with employees following a merger: a longitudinal ﬁeld experiment”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 34, pp. 110-35. Snyder, M. (1974), “The self-monitoring of expressive behavior”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 30, pp. 526-37. Staw, B.M. and Ross, J. (1985), “Stability in the midst of change: a dispositional approach to job attitudes”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 70, pp. 469-80. Tsoukas, H. (1996), “The ﬁrm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 11-26. Vandenberg, R.J. and Lance, C.E. (2000), “A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research”, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 3, pp. 4-69. Wanous, J.P., Reichers, A.E. and Austin, J.T. (1994), “Organizational cynicism: an initial study”, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, pp. 269-73. Watzlawick, P. (1978), The Language of Change, Basic Books, New York, NY. Weick, K. and Quinn, R. (1999), “Organizational change and development”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 50, pp. 361-86. Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D.F. and Summers, G.F. (1977), “Assessing reliability and stability in panel models”, in Heise, D.R. (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1977, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 84-136. Corresponding author H. Jack Walker can be contacted at: firstname.lastname@example.org
Integration of change factors
To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: email@example.com Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints
Please join StudyMode to read the full document