Preview

factions by plato and madison

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
factions by plato and madison
Plato believed that the chief cause of factions is the difference in property owners. Recall that he said: "In each city there exists two cities; the city of the rich and the city of the poor - eternally at war."

Madison was similar in his belief though, he believed the primary cause of factions is the unequal distribution of property.

They each had their own set of solutions. Madison understands that factions cannot be eliminated (recall Federalist 10) where he provided the two methods in which they can be removed. First, one would have to destroy liberty - which is counter to a democratic society (and would not work). Second, he suggested that the only other way to destroy factions within a society was to provide each person with the same set of opinions, ideals, and beliefs. Again, counter to a free society.

Therefore the only way to redress factions is to control their effects. There are two ways he suggested to accomplish this. First, decentralize power at the national and state levels; spread the power out. Second, spread the middle class out (by encouraging land ownership) and encourage property ownership.

Plato had a different view. He thought factions should be eliminated. This could be accomplished by doing away with the current ruling class and using his theories cited in Plato's Communism.

Recall there are two main points to it: First, the society would be divided up into three classes: The Philosopher Kings (rulers), the Guardians (protectors), and the Merchants (middle class). The ruling class would no claim to private property. Also, they would live in barrack style accommodations and eat with other rulers at a common table.

The second point to Plato's idea is that marriage for the ruling class would be abolished as it is a distraction to governmental duties, according to Plato; an end to monogamous sexual relations for the ruling class. This would be replaced with selected breeding chosen by the ruling class in an attempt to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist No 10 was an essay written by James Madison and published through many news papers along with many others for the decision to have the United States Constitution ratified. Madison believed that the constitution formed a government that was in enough power to do away with the chaos caused by groups of people known as factions. In Madison's terms factions were people who gathered together to protect and promote their special economic interest and political opinions.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison begins his famous Federalist 10 paper by stating that a strong argument in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it creates a government in control of the chaos, violence, and destruction caused by the factions in society. James Madison defines a faction as group of people who collectively work together to protect and promote their own economic interests and political opinions. In my opinion, these factions are inevitable, and this because of human nature and attraction theory. When people hold certain ideologies, possess specific amounts of wealth, and possess different amounts of property, they will most likely associate themselves with people who are most similar to them. Factions in society are completely opposite and…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison states, "The latent causes of faction are thus sown in the nature of man," (Madison, Paragraph 5) so the solution is to control their effects. He makes an argument on how this is not feasible in a moral democracy but practical in a republic. Effects of a faction vary depending on whether the faction is a majority or minority faction. Madison argues that the only strenuous effects to control will come from majority factions. He states that the concept of popular sovereignty should keep minority factions from acquiring an influence. “But the most common and durable source of factions has been the various and unequal distribution of property. Those who hold and those who are without property have ever formed distinct interests in society” (Madison, Paragraph 5). However he argues that undesirable passions can spread from a small size to a majority faction fairly quickly. “. The regulation of these various and interfering interests forms the principal task of modern legislation, and involves the spirit of party and faction in the necessary and ordinary operations of the government” (Madison, Paragraph…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Constitution: A Minority Document Charles Beard argues that the Constitution was written by a group of people who had certain specific economic and political interests. Beard states that the Constitution didn’t reflect the interests of the general population. Beards mentions that the framers largest fear was the corruption of a democratic government. Those with out property were usually excluded from voting, and elections often occurred indirectly to limit the power of the uneducated public. The Constitution was intended to get rid of the character of evil. Beard also states that the Convention members knew from their personal economic affairs the precise results which the new government that they were setting up was designed to attain. It also ensures a division of society into different interests and party’s. Beard also writes that Madison makes the underlying political science of constitution in the tenth number. Here he lays down, in no uncertain language, the principle that the first and elemental concern of every government is economic. The first objective of government is the protection of the diversity in the faculties of men from which the rights of property originate. The most common source of factions is the unequal distribution of property. An unequal distribution of property is inevitable, and from its contending factions will rise in the state. To secure the public good the contending classes cannot be eliminated and their interests are bound to be reflected in politics, the only way out lies in making it difficult for enough contending interests to fuse into a…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is the desire for different opinions regarding religion, government, etc. While mankind is fallible, there will continue to be separation of human desires into different parties and groups which attack each other rather than working collectively for the greater good. The “most common and durable source of factions”, as provided by Madison, is that of perceived unfairness of property distribution. Moreover, a significant issue that arises with factions is the judging of one’s own case. “No man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause, because his interest certainly bias his judgement, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity.” The determination of a cause would undoubtedly lead be in the favor of the man both presenting and determining the case. Likewise, the public good will often suffer under the hands of statemen who seek their own good rather than the needs of the community.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the first Federalist paper, No. 10 written by James Madison, is an informative piece of writing warning us against the dangers of having such a strong, powerful government and what ways that we can break away from the “Violent Factions”. (Paragraph 1, Line 3.) As Madison goes on, he goes into great detail on the two ways of defeating the creation of factions. One would be to get rid of liberty and freedom all together, which is impossible to complete. The second way to get ride of the factions would be “by giving to every citizen the same opinions, the same passions, and the same interests.” (Paragraph 4, line 2.) Both of those methods are equally unwise as it is impossible to complete. As it is hardwired into…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison made his concern of tyranny known especially in the 10th Federalist Paper, with some mention in his other papers, and writings including the Constitution in which his contributions were heavily influenced by his concerns. Factions were a legitimate threat, and the greatest of the potential evils for the United States because the good of the public would be disregarded by the majority faction, and they would make hasty decisions that would harm the country. The greatest cause for factions as described by Madison in the tenth federalist paper is different degrees of possession of…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Indeed, it was James Madison in Federalist 10 that said that factions are groups that unite to serve selfish goals, not the national interest. It is necessary to control them through constitutional means, one of which is the creation of a large republic, which helps disperse factions and to reduce their influence on the national legislature. Madison in his paper is warning the contractures of the constitution that factions are the ultimate rival of the government. They will try to force upon government their own ideals instead of the more important issues of national interest.…

    • 2515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    hi list of my future

    • 472 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Madison states that factions can have many causes for forming. What cause does he…

    • 472 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The folk behind the Federalist movement included farmers on the frontier, businessmen near navigable water or involved in interstate trade, minorities whose rights were unprotected by the states, and slaveholders who realized the benefits of the Three Fifths Clause. Furthermore, many of the important faces of the American Revolution, including George Washington and Ben Franklin, were Federalists and helped sway a public that held them up to be godly figures of early republic. Madison’s anonymous papers such as Federalist 10 helped the party to dominate a Federalist-friendly press and have their ideas spread throughout the country. In Federalist 10, Madison turns a what Antifederalists view as negative aspect of the Constitution, a consolidated government over an immense land, and turns it into a remarkable bonus that avoids any faction getting an upper hand. Madison considers that men of a majority will oppress the minority if “the impulse and opportunity coincide” and that “neither moral nor religious motives can be relied on as an adequate control” to these urges. Therefore, a government that is divided up into many factions can have no one ruling majority and in turn, no group will predominantly sway to oppress a minority. Madison then continues on to say how a “pure democracy” of a small number of citizens can “admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction” because on such a small scale, nearly everyone, besides the minority, will belong to the same faction and in turn, the majority. To combat the problems of a strong majority, Madison argues that the elected officials will “discern the true interest of their country” and will avoid the temptation to succumb to the needs of “temporary or partial considerations.” Madison worked to find a balance in the number of representatives…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Papers

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What are the “two methods of removing the causes of factions”? What does Madison think of these two approaches? Is he in favor of removing the causes?…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato was an interesting individual, and has always been one of my favorite Philosophers. I personally like most of his political ideals, and find them almost in alignment with my own. In particular I like his reasoning when it comes to the citizens that make up the city-state, along with the leadership. So throughout this essay I plan on drawing from the Republic to talk more about this Philosopher’s ideas.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By looking at oligarchy, democracy and military governments developed from overrule of tyrants from the Archaic to the Classical periods, it is apparent that Greece was in need of political unification.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato bases his argument on Athens and what his own personal experience with democracy. Professor Samons makes an interesting point when he says that after watching…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato has an aversion to democracy because it violates the proper order of society by creating an artificial equality. His basic criticism is that democracy is an irrational form of constitution. It is based on the assumption that every citizen is equally entitled to a say in political affairs, no matter how unsuited he is in terms of ability, character or training. In this form of democracy, it doesn’t matter how ignorant a person is, he could still play a significant role in public affairs if he speaks persuasively enough. Plato was disgusted by the idea of a system where value and merit are disregarded and instead unconditional equality. He and Socrates both felt that all people were born with knowledge, but that not all people were in touch with the knowledge they possessed. Plato rejected the idea that all men are equals. Plato also believed that man was not self-sufficient; he believed man would be most happy living in a state, being ruled over. It seems that he also believed all men wanted to live the truly good life where they could be in tune with the truth and achieve their ultimate goals. When discussing a democratic society and its leaders, Plato says, “When a democracy which is thirsting for freedom has evil cupbearers presiding over the feast, and has drunk too deeply the strong wine of freedom, then, unless her rulers are very amenable and give a plentiful draught, she calls them to account and punishes them, and says…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays