Facebook Psychology

Topics: Facebook, Social network service, MySpace Pages: 40 (10214 words) Published: March 25, 2013
Psychology of Popular Media Culture
2012, Vol. 1, No. 1, 23–37

© 2012 American Psychological Association
2160-4134/12/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0026452

Facebook Psychology: Popular Questions Answered by Research
Beth Anderson

Patrick Fagan

University of London

University College London

Tom Woodnutt

Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic

Independent Social Media Consultant

University of London, and NYU-in London, UK

Since its launch in February 2004, Facebook has become one of the most popular websites in the world, as well as a widely discussed media phenomenon. Unsurprisingly, the Facebook revolution has inspired a wealth of psychological study, which is growing exponentially. In this article, we review the recent empirical research into some of the key psychological themes concerning Facebook use. The review is organized according to common questions about Facebook culture and use being posed by academics and social commentators alike. These questions are grouped under three major themes, namely: (a) antecedents of Facebook use; (b) how individuals and corporations use Facebook; and (c) psychological outcomes or effects of Facebook use. To this end, we review over 100 recent publications (mostly empirical, peer-reviewed journal articles). We conclude by providing some suggestions for future psychological research in this rapidly expanding area of popular media culture. Keywords: Facebook, social networking, social media, cyber-psychology, computer-mediated communication

tive members internationally in late 2011. It is
“one of the most-trafficked sites in the world”
(Facebook, 2011a) at times, more trafficked
even than Google.
Facebook’s popularity has rendered it the focus of considerable debate within the academic world. This has related particularly to the implications of its use on such areas as relationship-formation and satisfaction (e.g., Sheldon, Abad, & Hinsch, 2011); identity construction

(e.g., Zhao, Grasmuck, & Martin, 2008; Back et
al., 2010); psychological and emotional wellbeing (e.g., Valkenburg, Peter, & Schouton, 2006; Sigman, 2009; Kalpidou, Costin, & Morris, 2011); personal professional boundaries (e.g., Devi, 2011; MacDonald, Sohn, & Ellis,

2010); learning (e.g., English & DuncanHowell, 2008; Kabilan, Ahman, & Abidin, 2010); and privacy (Gross & Acquisti, 2005;
Hartzog, 2009). While some of these issues
have polarized opinion, the complex nature of
Facebook interactions has been recognized
(e.g., Kujath, 2010; Sheldon et al., 2011) and
needs to be reflected in study of this medium.
Indeed, global-level discourse on the role
played by such SNSs as Facebook in catalyzing
revolutionary social change only supports this

The recent explosion in computer-mediated
communication has led to a phenomenal upsurge in the availability and use of social networking sites (SNSs; for definition and history see, Boyd & Ellison, 2007). SNSs can be general or specific in nature (e.g., focusing on particular populations or activities), but they all provide a virtual platform where users can

“present” themselves, articulate their social networks, and establish or maintain connections with others (Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe,
2007). One of the most popular SNSs is Facebook. Launched on February 4, 2004 (originally at http://www.thefacebook.com) and reliant on
a continually developing, custom-built infrastructure, the site reached over 750 million ac-

Beth Anderson, Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths,
University of London, London, UK; Patrick Fagan, University College London, London, UK; and Tom Woodnutt, Independent Social Media Consultant; Tomas ChamorroPremuzic, Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, and NYU-in London, UK. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Dr. Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, SE14 6NW, London,

UK. E-mail: t.chamorro-premuzic@gold.ac.uk



References: Acar, A. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of
online social networking behavior: The case of
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.
Alapack, R., Blichfeldt, M. F., & Elden, A. (2005).
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of
expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal
Back, M. D., Shmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. E. (2008).
(2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science,
21(3), 372–374.
Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The
Internet and social life
Ben-Ze’ev, A. (2005). Detachment: The unique nature
of online romantic relationships
Bonds-Raacke, J., & Raacke, J. (2010). MySpace and
Facebook: Identifying dimensions of uses and
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G.
Boyd, D. M. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth,
identity, and digital media volume (pp
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network
sites: Definition, history, and scholarship
(2010). Too many Facebook ‘friends’? Content
sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy
Human-Computer Interaction, 26(11/12), 1006 –
Buffardi, L. E., & W. K. Campbell (2008). Narcissism and social networking Web sites. Personality
& Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(10), 1303–1314.
Burns, K. (2010, August). Brands among friends: An
examination of brand friending and engagement
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for
Caplan, S. E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based
cognitive-behavioral measurement instrument
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2011). Personality and individual differences (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell-Wiley.
Channel 4 News. (2011, February 25). Arab revolt:
Social media and the people’s revolution
Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009).
Cone Inc. (2010). 2010 Cone Consumer New Media
Study conducted by ORC
Costa, P. T., & McCrae R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R
professional manual
Devi, S. (2011). Facebook friend request from a
patient? The Lancet, 377(9772), 1141–1142.
Donath, J. S., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of Neocortical
size, group size and language in humans
Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of
objective self awareness
Ellison, N. B. Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007).
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011).
English, R., & Duncan-Howell, J. (2008). Facebook
goes to college: Using social networking tools to
Facebook. (2011a, April 28). Facebook factsheet.
Facebook. (2011b, May 28). Statistics. Retrieved from
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • impact of facebook on the student performance Essay
  • The Psychology of Facebook Essay
  • Related Studies of Facebook Essay
  • Facebook Essay
  • Facebook Essay
  • Facebook Essay
  • facebook Essay
  • Effect of Facebook on depression Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free