Preview

Eye For An Eye

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
430 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eye For An Eye
An Eye For An Eye Capital punishment has often been referred to as ‘an eye for an eye’. This idiomatic expression dates back to Mesopotamian times from Hammurabi’s Code. The phrase represents what many view as a harsh sense of justice based on a need for reprisal. What is the real purpose for capital punishment? Many Americans are becoming less and less concerned with using punishment as a deterrent for future crimes and more focused on using it as a means of retribution.
In a recent study, eighty-eight percent of criminologists from the National Research Council, believed that executions are not a deterrent to murder. Research suggests that offenders are predominantly afraid of whether they will be caught, and not on the repercussions that follow. Daniel Nagin, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University, states "It's the certainty of apprehension that’s been demonstrated consistently to be an effective deterrent, not the severity of the ensuing consequences”( Nagin 1). In other words, people are more likely to commit a crime if they feel they
…show more content…
However, emotion should not exculpate a system of justice, with all of its accompanying problems. Which leads to the final problem with capital punishment; our laws and the criminal justice system should lead us to higher principles that demonstrate a complete respect for life, even the life of a murderer. Capital punishment encourages, if not attempts to justify, motives for revenge. Murder cannot be resolved through the taking of another human life. This would cause the very system that seeks justice to be reduced to something that is neither just nor adheres to higher principles. Answering violence with further violent punishment robs society of our basic humanity. And that is too high a price to pay. This really isn’t justice at all, but rather vengeance, thinly masked as a principle of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    As well as seeing deterrence as a justifiable reason for the death penalty, individuals believe it is an act of fairness and retribution. They see it as a way of “maintaining the distribution of civic burdens”, and a method of payback, which is the “eye for an…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Everybody believes that capital punishment is wrong, but when they look at certain cases, they are quick to say, “Put them to death”, or “scream capital punishment.”” Jeff Lindsay. Capital punishment is the legally authorized killing of someone as a punishment for a crime. It has been around since time itself. In the 1700’s, The Code of Hammurabi was the first known written document there were twenty-five crimes that were punishable by death such as adultery, and helping slaves escape. Only the most heinous of those warranted such a stringent sentence. And while there are many methods that may take a prisoner's life, there are also alternatives. One must ask though, “Do those options do justice to the unspeakable acts these criminals have…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rogerian and Toulmin

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital punishment has been around for decades and continues to alter as awareness of its negative connotations rise. Even in the late 1800’s we saw people trying to adjust the act in an attempt to make it more humane. The battle between morality and justice has developed throughout history and is existent now more than ever.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phil 1112 Death Penalty

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The dictionary defines the death penalty as punishment for someone convicted of a capital crime. Dating back to centuries ago, any capital crime such as murder, rape, drug trafficking were not tolerated by any means and were immediately sentenced to death. “An eye for an eye” was the typical argument that defended the side that the punishment should equal the crime. In an article written by Louis Pojman, he defends the death penalty with his own “eye for an eye” theory. His reasoning is that he believes humans are logical creatures who make the logical choice to commit a muder, therefore giving up their right to live. Pojman argues that the death penalty is a good deterrent for potential…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    CJA 354 week 1

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Capital punishment has continued to be used as the major punishment for convicted felons for a long time now. However, it has been a subject of controversy in recent years and has been seen as an inhuman mode of punishment in the modern era. This is because of the various legal challenges it faces and the methods used in executing the punishment, which include the use of a firing squad, lethal injections and the electric chair among others. However, those supporting capital punishment argue that revenge is the only way justice can be achieved while those against it see it all wrong for the state to take any citizen’s life (Neubauer and Fradella 391).…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal deterrence will continue to be a valuable part of criminological studies. The rational choice perspective has expanded tremendously in the last few decades. It allows criminologist to examine the reasoning process of not only offenders, but the victims as well. The concept of deterrence assumes a much higher degree of rationality. Deterrence doctrine uses the three functions of certainty, severity, and speed of punishment as key elements in the rational decision making process aimed at deciding between criminal and non-criminal paths of conduct (2013). The death penalty does serve as a deterrence from crime. But studies have indicated this might not be the case for every offender. But I would argue that even the deterrence of one individual…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of the death penalty can be traced back in time all the way to the fifth century B.C. through Roman’s Law of the Twelve Tablets, where people would be put to death through crucifixion, drowning, and even by being burnt alive.. From there it can be found in seventh B.C.’s Draconian Code, and even in eighteenth century B.C. through the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, in which twenty-five various crimes would lead to the death penalty (Part I, 2015). Though the crimes punishable under the death penalty and the methods of which the death penalty have changed over time, the ideology behind the method still stands the same: An eye for an eye. The argument for the death penalty stands that those who commit a crime such as capital murder should be punished the same way that they punished their victim: by death. However, while this ethical principle may sound clear and cut on paper, the stance-both for and against-and methodology behind the death penalty is much more complicated than that.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The death penalty has been an ongoing debate on whether it should be allowed or whether it violates our constitutional right. While most developed Western nations have stopped executing the United States continues to execute offenders (Zimring 2004). From 1977 through 2008 1,136 people have been executed, which consisted of people who committed murder (Procon 2010). Those who are in favor of the death penalty believe it is an important tool to help deter crime and it cost less than life imprisonment (Procon 2010). They believe retribution helps console the grieving family and it also ensures that the offender will never be able to commit another heinous crime (Procon 2010). According to Grant (2004) some people believe that some offenders should face the death penalty because of vengeance and retribution for violent crimes. During the…

    • 1847 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    They argue that vengeance or an eye for an eye pays respect to the victim, but also it helps to comfort the grieving families (Pojman, 2006). The advocates argue that it guarantees that the criminal of the terrible crimes never will have another chance to cause potential heartbreak.…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth,” otherwise known as the law of retaliation is the idea that when someone does something wrong to us we are allowed to retaliate in a similar degree to even the wrong done. The use of the death penalty in the United States as a form of legal punishment reflects this very concept. More frequent than not, when the death penalty is being sought within a criminal trial it is paired with a murder charge. This desire to inflict an essentially “even” punish for murder, effectively sentencing a person to death yourself because of the choice to take a life, reflects the very essence of the law of retaliation. While the law of retaliation has no limitations and in theory is something we may always put into practice, the death penalty is not such a thing and is instead a highly regulated form of punishment or “retaliation”.…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the types of sentences that can be given to a criminal can be in the form of retribution. Retribution can also be seen as saying an eye for an eye for example if a kid is caught stealing a candy bar from a convenient store then the punishment may be that they have to pay for it somehow. This type of sentence is mostly seen in death penalty cases today such as a life for a life. “The law of "an eye for an eye" is usually called the law of retribution, or "lex talionis" (Latin, lex [law] and talio [like]; the punishment is like the injury), or the law of equivalency.” (Rodríguez, 1998)…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporters of the death penalty always say that it is deterrent to crime but after several years of intensive research, 1)there is no proof that the death penalty is more effective than the alternatives. Furthermore the capital punishment is neither a practical nor a cost-efficient punishment. 2) In a detailed study in 2009,criminologists at the University of Texas at Dallas showed the falls information earlier studies provided, claiming that the death penalty had a deterrent effect (Christof Heyns and Juan Mendez). The government's job is it to protect the country’s citizens, but there is only little evidence that the death penalty is a strong deterrent to murder and other crimes. A recent study shows…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As human we tend to crave revenge when we have been hurt, but when doing so we only hurt others ultimately repeating the circle of hate. While, at the time, capital punishment seems like the most justice thing to do it often brings us back to our sense of morality. Everyone has a different perspective on morality and the ethics that come along with that. While some choose to use theirs in difference is not how you practice; revenge heals you for a time being but the guilt of punishing a person to death row and later finding out they were innocent could haunt you for a lifetime. As we claim the lives of individuals who are innocent due to unconscious racial beliefs and stereotypes, racism continues to exists and the justifications are granted due to media reports that depict what they want to portray. While those in power can state that capital punishment is merely devoted crime control it eventually has no effect, especially when claiming innocent lives. Ultimately, it comes down to the disruption of every human desiring a life with liberty and the pursuit of…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death Penalty

    • 4827 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Proponents of the death penalty say it is an important tool for preserving law and order, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment. They argue that retribution or "an eye for an eye" honors the victim, helps console grieving families, and ensures that the perpetrators of heinous crimes never have an opportunity to cause future tragedy.…

    • 4827 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays