Preview

Extensive Use Of Lay Magistrates

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1099 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Extensive Use Of Lay Magistrates
No legal system makes extensive use of lay magistrates as England and Wales. Lay magistrates become formalised in the Justice of the Peace Act 1361, but the English legal system makes use of lay (non professional) magistrates since 1195. The reason of the use of lay magistrates lies in the notion of participatory democracy , “judgement by one’s peers” . Throughout the years many have encountered in reforms, opinions and discussion regarding the role of judges within the system.
Together with district judges, lay magistrates deal with 95 per cent of criminal cases. In England and Wales lay magistrates usually sit in a bench of three, or sometimes two. The one who sit in the middle and speaks on behalf of them all, is called ‘Chairman’, usually
…show more content…
The majority of them stated that the process is slow and consequently is stressful; this could bring people to lose interest to apply for it.
The Morgan and Russel report (2000) shows that the benches are gender balanced, actually statistics from 2013 show that there are slightly more women than men. The same report shows that there is an overwhelming concentration of professionals and manager. It indicates that there is a lack of representation of different ethnicities. This report could not show any opinion about political affiliation because there are not enough data.
How to recruit a more diverse and representative bench of magistrates: firstly nearly 90% of the magistrates are from “higher managerial, administrative and professional occupation” , most of them are retired and most of the defendants are young with a higher proportion of BAME residents. Involving young people in the court as lay magistrates could give the opportunity to reduce the average of old magistrates and widen the diversity of the bench. Secondly according to Penelope Gibbs and Amy Kirby in Judged by peers? The diversity of lay magistrates in England and Wales (Howard League What is Justice? Working Papers 6/2014) the magistrates recruitment is frozen. However, the article shows some possible

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Discuss the presentation of the legal establishment in Act One Scene 2 and elsewhere in the play…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lay people are people who don’t get paid and who are not qualified; they are volunteer’s, lay people in the law are the magistrate and the jury and I will be explaining their role and the advantages and disadvantages of having lay people get involved with the legal system.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 23 - D1

    • 2776 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Lay people are extremely useful individuals within the civil and criminal courts within the English legal system. The most influential lay people are the Lay Magistrates and the Jury who have important roles with the legal system. Magistrates usually deal with most cases that are heard within the criminal system. They are the decision makers as to guilt or innocence making 97-99% of all cases while on the other hand 1% of cases are heard with a jury present. This shows us that those that are not legally qualified make most decisions regarding the criminal justice system, which means that they are ordinary people who hail from different backgrounds within society.…

    • 2776 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Unit 23

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages

    This court deals with mainly criminal cases but rarely civil cases. All criminal cases start off in the Magistrates’ Court and are heard by either lay magistrates or district judges. District judges are legally trained but lay magistrates are not, they do however have to be assisted by a legally trained clerk. Magistrate Courts will only hear cases that have happened in their area and can only administer punishment of up to £5,000 or 6 months imprisonment. If the crime requires more than what the magistrate can administer than the case will be passed on to the Crown Court. Jury can also move up the case to the Crown Court if the defendant asks for trial.…

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Koopmans, Tim. Courts and Political Institutions- A Comparative View. (2005). (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge). [24 April 2007].…

    • 2886 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tribunals are an essential part of the British Legal System and are see as part of the popular Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Their main purpose was to give the public a means of settling disputes regarding their scial rights and various other areas such as employment law. For example if a person felt they were incorrectly dismissed from their employment, they would use a tribunal as means of settling the issue rather than a criminal court. Tribunals, more often than not, are attended by one legally qualified person and two people that have no specialized legal training but expertise in the relevant subject area. These people are known…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law M1

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are two types of judges, superior judges and inferior judges in the UK. The superior judges are entitled to work in the higher courts such as, the court of Appeal, and the House of Lords. Whereas, inferior judges work in the lower courts in the hierarchy such as crown courts and supreme courts. Superior judges are called district judges and inferior judges are called circuit judges. District judges are full-time judges who deal with the majority of cases in the county courts. These judges are appointed by the queen and mainly deal with claims and other matters within the court. However, Circuit judges are appointed to one of seven regions of England and Wales, and sit in the crown and county courts within their particular region. The difference between both judges is that, superior judges are more experienced as compared to the inferior judges, they have a minimum experience of 20 years but inferior judge has less experience so therefore, they have to do some training. Superior judges wear long wigs and extravagant gowns; however, inferior judges also wear the same but a bit shorter. For superior judges their salaries are a lot higher compared to inferior judges.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During this paper I am going to be covering topics such as the courtroom work groups, the role of a prosecutor, the effects of the criminal justice funnel and the backlog of cases on the court system and the courtroom work group. Topics such as these are important to cover so that each individual has a complete understanding of the pros and cons of systems in the judicial system.…

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges represent an important central role in adjudicating disputes in a fair, unbiased manner by applying legal rules and play a vital role in controlling the exercise of power by the state. Judges may leave their position by the termination of an appointment: Dismissal due to breaching judicial disciplines, resignation of their own choice or suggestion by the Lord Chancellor for misbehaviour, removal due to disability by permanent infirmity from performance of duties and retirement at the age of 70 under the Judicial Pensions and Retirement Act 1993.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Georgia's Court System

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Magistrate courts are county courts that hear minor criminal offenses and civil claims involving amounts of $15,000 or less and issue warrants. Magistrate court is the first resort for many civil disputes that may include bad checks, county ordinance violations, landlord/tenant cases, and dispossessories/evictions. In criminal matters magistrates hold preliminary hearings; issue search warrants to law enforcement and also warrants for the arrest of a particular person. No jury trials are held in magistrate court. Rather than by an attorney, civil cases are often argued by the person themselves. The chief magistrate is either elected or appointed in each county. Other magistrates are appointed by the chief magistrate.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lay People Requirements

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During cases in the magistrate’s court, a panel of 3 lay magistrates are assisted by a legally qualified clerk to help advise them on the points of law and sentencing powers. There are no juries in the magistrate’s court however for indictable trials in the crown court, it will be heard by 12 juries who will listen to evidence provided and decide whether a person is guilty or innocent.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The UK criminal justice system tends strongly towards trial avoidance. Many reasons for trial avoidance may be monetary and time consuming reasons and possibly an effective method of dissolving the justice gap by clearing up mere offences. The organ of government responsible f or enforcing justice is the court. Depending on the offence committed, there are two courts involved which are the crown court and the magistrate court. The order for determining what mode of trial is now designed to portion majority of the cases which will now be heard in the magistrate court.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many judges in the criminal court system are not only overworked, but also must contend with the worst of society.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The police staff and other officers concerned are not satisfied with the delayed and inefficient justice system, which is against the victim (Irving and Hilgendorf 1980). The research studies conducted in order to get the opinion of police officer showed that they did not consider the deterrence to be sufficient (Jackson 2012). Instead of that, they want the provision of efficient and ample terms of punishment for the offenders on the society. The police staff complains that the evidence and other significant information collected by them against the influential offenders are ignored during the trials in the courts (Hough 2010). There is a complaint of unnecessary adjournments in the courts, which delays the final decision making of the cases. The repetitive adjournments are done in order to provide opportunity to the defendants to make their cases stronger as compared to those of the…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Federal Court System

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages

    District Court judges are often assisted by Magistrate Judges. Magistrates are not judges that have their place secured. But, they are auxiliary officers (appointed under Article I of the Constitution) who handle certain kinds of tasks sent by District Judges. Magistrates can take pleas of "not guilty" in felony criminal charges; they also frequently handle discovery disputes, misdemeanor trials, settlement negotiations, and hearings to calculate damages. Their orders can be appealed to the District Judge who initially had the…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays