Preview

Exploring The Absolute In Kant's Argument

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
673 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Exploring The Absolute In Kant's Argument
Lord Krishna lays down two important requirements for a person to understand the most secret knowledge about the God, namely the uncarping spirit, and the faith. The absence of cavil, or the uncarping spirit is a prerequisite for gaining an intimate, immediate and personal experience of the omnipresent reality of the absolute. Every spiritual aspirant must necessarily cultivate this quality. It is a divine characteristic, which makes a man's personality pure and lucent.
Carping nature is a big obstacle in the path to divinity, acquire mental equipoise and inner tranquillity. People, today, waste all their time and energy in blaming others without realizing that to search for and find faults in others is the most grievous and ghastly sin. Sometimes there is an argument
…show more content…
The true nature of the God is absolute consciousness, which is beyond sensory perception. Knowledge about the absolute is therefore one such issue, which cannot be explored based on knowledge gained through the senses. Mastery over the senses is required as the senses distort our view and veil the true reality. As famous philosopher Immanuel Kant said “man is blind, because he has eyes—deaf, because he has ears—deluded, because he has a mind—and the things he perceives do not exist, because he perceives them”. The argument rest upon the premise that any knowledge based on the information gained through sensory perceptions cannot correspond to the facts of reality, since it gets coloured through the senses. Since reason, logic, and science, based on sensory perceptions are denied access to the reality of the God, the door is open for men to approach reality from a different, so called non-rational method of faith. Faith is the only way to reach the absolute reality, it becomes difficult to obtain sovereign knowledge about the absolute reality by an ignorant, faithless, and a doubting

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Arguments against the Natural Knowledge of God states the existence of God are not convincing, and perhaps very questionable whether an analysis of the world and of ourselves leads us to a preliminary knowledge of God. In our studies we once thought is was the plan and purpose of a divine mind in nature was in fact only a pattern some falsely read into nature with our human minds (Guthrie, Shirley Caperton 47)…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    chp 5 Dr.Beckers book

    • 18144 Words
    • 73 Pages

    After briefly introducing the concept of revelation within Christian theology, this chapter first explores the problem of talking about God in our secular world, particularly about the objections to God-talk, especially from the atheistic position. The chapter then proceeds to discuss what Christian theologians call "the general revelation of God." This type of revelation is based on the natural knowledge of God which is generally or universally available to all human beings. The chapter investigates various objections to such knowledge, most especially those within atheistic critiques of both religion and God. The chapter then describes the principal positions that Christian theologians have taken regarding the possibility of a natural knowledge of God.…

    • 18144 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anselm, then posits a question of whether something of this nature exists, to which he builds an argument on the basis that if a person understands what it is meant by the term God then that person is motivated to the proposition that God exists. He argues that regardless of whether you believe in the existence of God or not you understand what is meant by the term God. To assert this point Anselm says even the fool (non-believer) when hearing the definition “understands what he hears, and what he understands exists in his understanding- even if he doesn’t think it exists.” He then makes the clear distinction that it is different for something to exist in understanding and to exist in reality. He furthers this point by using the analogy of the Painter who understands (in his…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the course of time, many philosophers, dogmatic religions and even individual human beings themselves have tried to prove the existence of God. The recurrent question that constantly arises is whether or not you can prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking alone. To that, the answer is no. It is not possible to prove the existence of God solely by rational thinking as you also need to incorporate aspects of faith, but rational thinking helps solidify your beliefs pertaining to God and leaves the answers we cannot conceive rationally up to faith. You cannot understand something outside of your existence rationally because you cannot experience it or see it; you can only theorize, believe and trust in it. You will never be able to reason what you have no knowledge of. In this essay, I will argue that in…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Big Paper 1

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is human nature to question our existence. Some believe it was God who created our existence, and others rely on science. This has been an ongoing debate since life on earth. This paper argues that it is not possible to prove either way whether if the traditional God exists or not. There are no credentials to prove God’s existence or lack of; it is merely a belief. Some may rely on the Bible as proof although there is no way to prove the stories within true.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant states that objects of belief are based on a priori reasoning, that the idea of a maximally great and omnipotent God is an a priori idea about a supersensible reality in the world of the noumena. A priori elements of cognition are innate to reason, whereas a posteriori elements are derived from sense, and he argues that both are equally crucial for knowledge. A priori perceptions and concepts also provide some a priori knowledge. For something to become an object of knowledge, it must be experienced, primarily, as Kant argues, by the senses. He concludes that it is impossible to prove the truth about God or any other supersensible concept such as the immortality of the soul or the freedom of the will which belong to the world of the noumena as theses supersensible concepts are matters of faith and therefore objects of belief – it is a common error to employ a priori reason beyond the domain of the senses and beyond the facts of empirical knowledge. God is not a fact, as facts are given by empirical knowledge, observation and the…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We strengthen our autonomy by challenging beliefs in our lives, such as our belief in a higher being, God. By doing so, individuals can deduce whether the belief in God is ‘rational’ or not. For theists, the façade of their deduction is irrational due to their commitment of faith. Also, humans are fundamentally irrational because we select deductions that are based on irrational facts and reasons. Therefore, in this essay, I will argue that no rational person can believe in God.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People can use their intuition to behold God’s spirit revealed in nature or in their own…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the way that Kant has been interpreted as a constructivist under the standard model, as Wood’s revealed, one can remark three points about this approach: Overemphasizing on the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), Conception of Value, Conception of Autonomy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anolgy of the cave

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Some people might not agree with his views of reality as although he states we cant trust our senses, they are all we have in our lives to gain experiences and therefore reality can only be sensed through them.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to discover what is moral or not, Kant believes that categorical imperative gives reasoning for any sort of action. In order to do so, one must think about the fundamental rule that goes in hand with what the person plans to fulfill in the first place. If a certain act can be applied to others and puts them in that exact situation, then it is moral. One concept of categorical imperative is known as “The Principle of Ends.” This theory describes individuals as worthy and valuable, depicting them as something worth more than a mere object. This pairs with the saying “treat others as you would like to be treated.” On a general status, I believe that this should be the correct thing to do. Concerning Kant, I disagree with his argument…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant Paper 2

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    maxim and why you could not achieve the purpose or end of the maxim in…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Emmanuel Kant argues that the human understanding of our world is perceived by our experiences and only through them can we gain knowledge. Kant’s philosophic question is rooted in the theory of understanding; in short, what can we know and how can we know it? Most of our knowledge of the world can be derived from our observation of it. As children, we see things, touch things, smell things and so on. Gradually, we understand the world in which we live in; this is the knowledge of sense-perception. For example, wind has no physical form but we can see its effects and can classify it as being part of nature. Kant, however, perceives knowledge only through our experiences. So going back to the example of wind, Kant would say we have knowledge of wind not because we…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Skepticism

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Immanuel Kant argued that although human knowledge comes from experience, nonetheless knowledge must be grounded in some necessary truths. It is hard to see how the existence of logically and metaphysically necessary truths is enough to ground human knowledge. Following Kant’s reasoning, there are certain types of knowledge we have no access to. I will argue that Presuppositionalism is more plausible than Kant’s skepticism about certain types of knowledge, and that from the Presuppositionalist perspective skepticism is self-refuting. If we don’t assume that God exists, we find that we can’t reach certain conclusions and are left wanting.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For this motion, although atheists and Christians have a different view of whether God exists or not, however they can both agree with this motion. Christians believe that God is infinite (above human experience), so there is no way of knowing him, and unlike humans he is not limited. God is often described as being transcendent (above human experience), inscrutable and unknowable so it’s impossible for humans to comprehend what he is like. Though atheists don’t believe in God and since it can’t be scientifically proved that he is real, there is no way of knowing what he is like, if he exists. In the Bible God is described as being loving but what sort of God allows bad things to happen, it can be argued that God is unpredictable. My last argument for this motion is from an agnostic point of view how can one know about what one has never seen, heard or experienced. The Bible conveys his teachings but there is no physical proof that he exists.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays