Preview

EXPLAINING THE IRAN – IRAQ WAR

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4624 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
EXPLAINING THE IRAN – IRAQ WAR
EXPLAINING THE IRAN – IRAQ WAR

Hostilities and border clashes occurred between Iraqi and Iranian forces before the 22nd of September 1980;[1] however, this date marks the official start of an eight year war that has in many ways become the most destructive and the bloodiest conflict since World War Two.[2] On that date the Iraqi government initiated synchronised strikes against Iranian airfields located within the range of its bombers, while Iraqi ground forces advanced into the Iranian province of Khuzistan.[3] Numerous explanations of causality and attempts to identify the origins of the conflict have been put forward, ranging from geopolitics and territorial disputes, to the attribution of the outbreak of war to the religious and ethnic divide that has separated Persians and Arabs, to grand design theory and finally to explanations claiming that this conflict is merely a continuation of an age-old rivalry between Arabs and Persians.[4] The aim of this essay is to look at the Iran-Iraq War through the lens of Realism and more specifically through that of the Security Dilemma with the intention of identifying the major causes of the conflict. In dealing with a causal question such as that above, one ultimately works with independent variables (IV) and a dependent variable (DV); the IV’s being those that cause the DV. For the purposes here, the DV is the Iran-Iraq War, and the IV’s are (i) perception, (ii) offense vs. defense and (iii) opportunity. The IVs identified here are the three components of the Security Dilemma, hence the abovementioned emphasis on the Security Dilemma as the primary tool in providing a causal analysis of the conflict.[5] This essay will provide an understanding of the Realist paradigm to ensure conceptual clarity. The Security Dilemma will be applied to the case of Iraq with the aim of identifying the IVs mentioned above towards the aim of establishing causality and finally will provide criticism of Security Dilemma and the Realist

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    battle field

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Biddle, S. (1996, Fall). Victory Misunderstood: What the Gulf War Tell Us About the Future of Conflict. International Security, 21(2).…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When wars break out, people often do not think of the reasons for why they break out, instead they either strongly support the war or are strongly against the war. The usual source of information to the public is by the use of media. The media never have a constant view or opinion of the war causes, or anything war related as they are either aligned with the far right, or aligned with the far left. With that said, the purpose of this research paper is to investigate and delve into the reasons of what causes war to erupt. Specifically, for this paper, it is going to look at two theoretical reasons as to why North Korea attacked South Korea. In the beginning of the paper, the two theories that will be used to explain why North Korea attacked…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1985, The Iran and Iraq war is feuding overseas and America had an embargo against selling arms to Iran. Our President was Ronald Reagan and the National Security Adviser was Robert McFarlane. “Iran made a secret request to buy weapons from the United States, McFarlane sought Reagan 's approval” McFarlane told Reagan “that the sale of arms would not only improve U.S. relations with Iran, but might in turn lead to improved relations with Lebanon, increasing U.S. influence in the troubled Middle East.” Reagan was having trouble with Lebanon the Iranian terrorist had Seven American hostages being held in Lebanon. Reagan was frustrated that he couldn’t bring these American hostages back home he believed that it was his duty. The U.S. an Iran were going to have to make a deal missiles for the hostages the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State were against making the deal but Reagan, McFarlane and the CIA director were all for the deal. Since Reagan backed the deal 1,500 missiles were shipped to Iran. The Iranian terrorist released three hostages but later captured three more.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    9/11 Summary

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The attack on the United States on September 11, 2001 (better known as 9/11) by Osama Bin Laden rammed a wedge into the relationship between the United States and the Islamic world. In result the U.S. invaded Afghanistan and the invaded Iraq. Professor Irogbe’s article on the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq argues that the U.S. actions are igniting rather than reducing global terrorism and if U.S. were to withdraw troops from these countries it would promise for global peace and security. The article covers the cost of human and financial resources of the war, abuses committed by invaders including the application of extraordinary rendition, the indefinite detention of prisoners…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Foreign Policy

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is common today that the United States foreign policy has been inspiring to a lot of nations worldwide. It is argued by a lot of political scholars that the 9/11 terrorist attack actually shaped the United States foreign policy. Even though it is debatable to if the 9/11 attack did shape the United States foreign policy and how it did that can be discovered at the end of this essay. This will be proven by analysing a theoretical view of terrorism and a little background of what happened in September 11, 2001 and the United States foreign policy before the 9/11 attack followed by policies like the Bush doctrine, Obama doctrine and also looking at their criticisms.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Billie

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Dodge, Toby, (2010), “The Ideological Roots of Failure: The Application of Kinetic Neo-Liberalism to Iraq.”…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Hannah Essay

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Michael Hannah first started his presentation on the “Rise of ISIS and their capabilities and what role should the United States play. Michael Hannah went on further and lamented on the invasion of Iraqi and he said “We still underestimate the 2003 invasion of Iraqi, we should know that we are still dealing with those ramifications of that war.” Mr. Hannah continues on to say that “during the year 2011 it was a contained complex operation, the lack of Iraqi capability after the United States drones…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Boyd, H. (2003). Iraq 's troubled history. The New York Amsterdam News, 94 (13), 4.…

    • 3428 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Fahrenheit 451

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Matusek, Matt. “Purpose of Iraq war murky to Americans.” 17 September 2004. The Online Rocket. 1 April 2008.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the last decade, America has engaged in war in two middle-eastern countries. These countries are Afghanistan and Iraq. America has waged war against these countries for common reasons, but each war also had its unique cause for war. America had a just cause in its war in Afghanistan, but its participation in the war in Iraq is debated. Two presidents who had to lead and deal with these wars were President George Washington Bush who was in office from 2000 to 2008, and current President Barack Obama who came into office 2008 and is currently in office. Two administrations created by the following Presidents were the Bush administration and the Obama administration created by President George W. Bush and Barack Obama respectively. The legitimacy of these wars in these respective countries is on the minds of many Americans today.…

    • 1940 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    President Bush’s justification towards the invasion on Iraq in 2004 explicated that the main reason to invade Iraq was security measures. Bush was terrified for the citizens of his country and the rest of the world, as he thought Iraq was in control of nuclear weapons that could harm everyone. However, this was not a true reflection of America’s ambitions in Iraq. This essay will prove that America’s intentions into Iraq was largely the fact that Iraq was a major oil source for the world and if America could dominate this source they could have more authority than any other country. Bush’s administration also misstated information regarding Iraq’s possessions of any Weapons of Mass Destruction, and their links with Al Qaeda for this purpose.…

    • 2121 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first assignment addressed the September 11 terrorist attacks as well as how these attacks hampered United States of America’s foreign policy. This assignment addresses five main issues. The first section identifies the way in which transitional actors, interest groups, the media and public opinion influenced the chosen event which in this case is the terrorist attacks in 2001. The second section is the usage of an expected utility theory in order to analyze chosen events. The third one is determining as well as discussing the foreign policies or models that played a role in the event. The fourth discusses…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    How were the United States goals in World War I similar or different to the United States goals for fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan?…

    • 2090 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    For the past decade, the U.S. has pursued patient and honorable efforts to disarm the Iraq regime without war. In 1991, Iraq pledged to reveal and destroy all of its weapons of mass destruction as a condition for ending the Persian Gulf War. However, Iraq’s actions never appeared to be truthful or honest. More than a dozen resolutions have been passed in the United Nations Council but the Iraqi regime has used diplomacy as a ploy to gain time and advantage. Over the years U.N. weapons inspectors have been threatened by Iraqi officials, electronically bugged, and systematically deceived. The U.S. has devoted 12 years of diplomacy to this issue but peaceful efforts to disarm the Iraqi regime failed many times, “because we are not dealing with peaceful men.” (George W. Bush, 2003, p. 22)…

    • 2749 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cba: World Conflicts

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The conflict in Iraq is considered by many people to be an unimportant one. But from researching this topic for the past few weeks, I have come to the conclusion that this was a very serious conflict. When Iraq was ruled by the brutal tyrant, Saddam Hussein, they instantly became one of the most violent countries in the world. In twenty years, Saddam led the Iraqi military to two wars. One war was against Iran that lasted from 1980-1988 and was considered to be one of the bloodiest wars in the history of the Middle East. The second one was the Gulf War of 1991 against Kuwait. Both of these wars were results of Saddam sending Iraqi soldiers into these two countries and demanding a piece of territorial land. The conflict in Iraq was a cause of Saddam Hussein forcing the country into multiple wars and ordering the killing of nearly a million Shi’i Muslims in Iraq.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays