Preview

Explaining Cognitive and Social-Cognitive Aspects of Personality on Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad’s Personality

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2768 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explaining Cognitive and Social-Cognitive Aspects of Personality on Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad’s Personality
Analyzing personality can be a complex process, in which there can be many answer. Personality theories seem to be possible to be applying in real life settings. This assignment is about how cognitive and social-cognitive aspects of psychology influenced Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad’s personality. For this assignment, I read through the different aspects of personality and found that Albert Bandura’s self-system reflects best on Dr. Mahathir’s personality development. This system suggests or provides the reader with clues in understanding Tun’s personality and insight into how Dr. Mahathir made his major life decisions and how effective they were in achieving his goals. Whether as a prime minister or not, Dr. Mahathir’s personality is well-known all across the world.
Cognitive theory explains behavior as guided by cognitions about the world, especially those about others. Another way to understand this theory is one’s expectations to those about other people (Wilderdom, 2003). Cognitive theories are theories of personality that emphasizes cognitive processes such as thinking and judging. Bandura’s theory of social-cognitive personality is significant in the field of cognitive psychology. Albert Bandura (1989) suggested the forces of memory and emotions working together with the environmental influences. According to Bandura, the self-system is the set cognitive process by which people perceives, evaluates, and cite regulates his or her behavior so that it is appropriate to the environment and effective in achieving goals (Bandura, 1978). The self system was originally developed by Harry Stack Sullivan in 1953 which is the individual’s collection of self-perceptions (Sullivan, 1953). As I followed Dr. Mahathir’s life, I realized the way he thought of ideas to solve problems is so much similar with a person who has social-cognitive based personality. So I choose to attempt applying Bandura’s self-system and other relevant concepts containing related theories to



References: Astrotheme, (2012). Mahathir Mohamad: Astrology and birth chart. Retrieved from http://www.astrotheme.com/astrology/Mahathir_Mohamad Bandura, A Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social-cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior, 4. New York: Academic Press, 71-81. Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Bernstein, R. M. (1980). The development of the self-system during adolescence. The journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on human development, 136(2), 231-245. Bullock-Yowell, E., Andrews, L., & Buzzetta, M. E. (2011). Explaining career decision-making self-efficacy: Personality, cognitions and cultural mistrust. The career development quarterly, 59(5), 400-411. Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M., & Barbaranelli, C. (2011). The contribution of personal traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study. British journal psychology, 81, 78-96. Clements Library, (1779). Terms of betrayal. Retrieved from http://www2.si.umich.edu/spies/stories-arnold-1.html Friedman, H Haji Azmy, (2009). Changes for hope: 20 strategies to become a developed country (introduction). Retrieved from http://changesforhopedrazmy.com/?tag=malaysias-father-of-modernization. M. Bakri Musa, (1999). The Malay dilemma revisited – Race dynamics in modern Malaysia. Gilroy, California: Merantau Publishers. MacKenzie, M. B., Mezo, P. G., & Francis, S. E. (2012). A conceptual framework for understanding self-regulation in adults. New ideas in psychology, 30(2), 155-165. Mahathir Mohamad, (2003). A tribute to Dr. Mahathir Mohamad: A great leader and statesman. Taman Pelangi, Johor Bahru: Various Channels Communication Sdn. Bhd. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1981). Vicarious learning: The influence of modeling on organizational behavior. The academy of management, 6(1), 105-113. Masilamany, J. (2006, June 29). Mending fences. theSun, 14. Milne, R. S., & Mauzy, D. K. (1999). Malaysian politics under Mahathir. Oxford, United Kingdom: Routledge. Morais, J. V. (1982). Mahathir: A profile in courage. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Eastern University Press. Nathan, L. (1999). ‘When push comes to shove’ the failure of international mediator in African civil wars. Track two, 8(2), 1-23. Perdana Leadership Foundation, (2010). Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. Retrieved from http://www.perdana.org.my/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=187&Itemid=136 Rock, M Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton. The Malaysian Times, (2012). Dr. Mahathir rules out international mediator’s role. Retrieved from http://www.themalaysiantimes.com.my/dr-mahathir-rules-out-international-mediators-role theStar, (2012) Wain, B. (2010). Malaysia maverick: Mahathir Mohamad in turbulent times. New York, New York: Palgrave Macmilan Wilderdom, (2003)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When people speak of someone having a personality they usually think of out an outgoing person or an abrasive person who can command attention. It is also usually stated in society that a quiet introverted person lacks a personality In psychology personality is defined as being made up of the characteristic patterns of thoughts, feelings and behaviors that make a person unique. SO with that being said it can be concluded that everyone person has a personality from the most loud and boisterous person to the most quite and meek person. In this paper I will describe the personality perspectives, how personality develops, and finally how personality can be assessed. There are 4 perspectives that can be used to describe how a personality is shaped. Those four perspectives of personality are the psychoanalytic perspective, humanistic perspective, social cognitive perspective, and the trait perspective.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Social Cognitive Theory is a theory that deals with cognitive, emotional aspects and aspects of behavior for understanding behavioral change. It is a belief that people learn there behaviors from others. According to the social-cognitive theory would suggest that individual with low self esteem can change their personality by applying the things they take in after observing other peoples behaviors whether they had low self esteem or not. Low self-esteem is having a generally negative overall opinion of oneself, judging or evaluating oneself negatively, and placing a general negative value on oneself as a person. . This is then incorporated in the learning theories such that the role model from whom the individual learns from plays a vital role in enhancing changes in self-esteem.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Friedman, H. & Schustack, M. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research (5thed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In terms of feeling, a low sense of self-efficacy is associated with depression, anxiety, and helplessness. Such individuals also have low self-esteem and harbor pessimistic thoughts about their accomplishments and personal development. In terms of thinking, a strong sense of competence facilitates cognitive processes and academic performance. Self-efficacy levels can enhance or impede the motivation to act. Individuals with high self-efficacy choose to perform more challenging tasks. They set themselves higher goals and stick to them (Locke & Latham, 1990). Actions are preshaped in thought, and people anticipate either optimistic or pessimistic scenarios in line with their level of self-efficacy. Once an action has been taken, high self-efficacious persons invest more effort and persist longer than those with low self-efficacy. When setbacks occur, the former recover more quickly and maintain the commitment to their goals. Self-efficacy also allows people to select challenging settings, explore their environments, or create new situations. A sense of competence can be acquired by mastery experience, vicarious experience, verbal persuasion, or physiological feedback (Bandura, 1992). Self-efficacy, however, is not the same as positive illusions or unrealistic optimism, since it is based on experience and does not lead to unreasonable risk taking. Instead, it leads to venturesome behaviour that is within reach…

    • 7561 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mahathir M 2003 Speech by Prime Minister of Malaysia to the Tenth Islamic Summit Conference Putrajaya, Malaysia, October 16, 2003…

    • 2391 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An individual’s personality is what makes them unique. Whether personality is naturally born or developed through experience, behavior is based upon these tendencies. Temperaments, traits, and attitudes affect the quality of life of each individual. This is assuming one is in a non-oppressive relativity free environment. The examination of one’s own personality including their strengths, weaknesses, and talents is beneficial to their pursuit of happiness and optimal mental health. The misunderstanding of these qualities lowers one’s quality of life and or lead to mental disorders or unhappiness that might otherwise be preventable through self-analysis and understanding of self and others.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gardner’s definition of interpersonal relationships is understanding others. The way people feel about relationships will be influenced by the rewards of the relationship as well as what they may receive. People are at different levels with regards to our interactivity. Interpersonal relationships are not static entities. They are constantly changing, evolving. They are also manifested in our body language, dialogue and culture. Culture and environment sometimes forms how people construct their world and the relationships in it.…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although considerable research has been devoted to the study of self-efficacy in educational settings, most of the students under study were from Western cultures and were usually in American settings (Klassen, 2004). Therefore, culturally attentive studies are necessary to investigate students’ self-efficacy in a range of social and cultural settings. We cannot assume that self-efficacy functions in the same way with all Asian students or with any other ethnic group of students because they have different culture from Western countries.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Semai Culture

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Dentan, R. (1968). The Semai: A Nonviolent People of Malaysia. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Bali Bombing

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Effendy, Bahtiar. Islam and the State in Indonesia. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2003.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some people leave imprints in our life because of the charisma in their persona. All that remains in our memory is a person’s behavior and attitude in life and that essentially determines a person’s character. As a part of our academic study we got a chance to analyze a successful personality. We analyzed some of Mr. Narayana Murthy’s personality traits.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There will come a time in our lives wherein we will evaluate ourselves and will try to reach our maximum potential. Carl Rogers believed that humans have one basic motive, that is the tendency to self-actualize - i.e. to fulfill one 's potential and achieve the highest level of 'human-beingness ' we can (McLeod). In the IT Crowd’s episode, “Are we not Men?” the two main characters, Roy and Moss are in the process of self- actualization and shows that they have self- discrepancies.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The aim of this essay is to name and identify the various theories of personality as well as explain the theoretical concepts within these theories. The assignment will also cover the similarities and differences within the two theories. It is also shown that the two theoretical approaches of personality chosen will be discussed by explaining the structure within the personality theory, the methods of gathering data and the strengths and weaknesses of the two theories.…

    • 2895 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory of Personality

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages

    While studying the theories given by scholars such as Freud, Adler, and Horney, one cannot help but forming an opinion of what is right and what is wrong. During class, I would see flashes of things and think, “wow, that actually sounds correct to me”, but there were many other times when I found myself disagreeing or sometimes snickering at the ridiculous of some theories. Weighing each theory studied, I believe I have found different parts of each psychologist that creates one concrete theory that I believe whole-heartedly. This theory takes a little from almost everything theorist studied, with some of my own original ideas brought from a Christ-centered viewpoint.…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Coon, D., & Mitterer, J. O. (2013). Introduction to psychology: Gateways to mind and behavior (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning…

    • 1107 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays