Preview

Explain Why Was There Tension Between Stalin And His People Between 1928-1941

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2416 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why Was There Tension Between Stalin And His People Between 1928-1941
Why was there tension between Stalin and his people between 1928-1941?

After Lenin’s death in 1924, the two leading candidates for his successor were Stalin and Trotsky-both with opposing ideologies in the manner in which the country should be run. Despite being a brilliant speaker and writer, Trotsky’s policy on a ‘permanent revolution’ worried people in the fear that the USSR would get involved with more conflicts while Stalin’s proposition of ‘Socialism in One Country’ was far more comforting for people. After being elected leadership of the party in 1924, Stalin did not have complete supremacy in his power until 1929 and once acquired, despite his best efforts, between the period of 1928-1941 saw economic, political and social tension between Stalin and his people.
…show more content…
Stalin did not want to share power and so moved against other leading communists who might threaten him like his removal of power of left-wingers Kamenev and Zinoviev in 1926 and 1929. There were initial signs of terror in 1928 when engineers were accused of sabotage and later in 1931 where former Mensheviks were put on charge. However the true start of the horrific period known as the Purges began in 1934 where Kirov, the leader of the Leningrad, was murdered when there were suspicions that his opponents were planning to replace him. This was the perfect motive for Stalin as he proceeded to ‘purge’ out the rest of his opposition in the party. Source 23 in the source booklet demonstrates the extent of the purges as we can see that ‘Stalin the executioner alone remains’ from Lenin’s general staff of 1917; the rest of the members including famous names likes Trotsky, Bukharin and Kamenev are either missing, dead or executed. The reliability of the source can be questioned as it was put together by Trotsky supporters, whom Stalin had fought for power with,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The most important individual in bringing about the change in influence is Vladimir Lenin, who brought about a sudden sharp rise in the party’s popularity. Following the 1917 October Revolution, Lenin became the leader of the Communist Party and greatly increased the party’s political influence with his ‘one party state’. Lenin’s creation of the Politburo in 1919, which was a group of eight high profile party members who influenced any decision being made, demonstrates the party’s increased political influence by showing their domination of governmental bodies. Public support of the party is obvious in the increase of RCP membership, March 1919 to March 1920, from 250,000 to 612,000. This may have been due mainly to Lenin retaining his power through the 1918 civil war. In 1921, Lenin introduced his New Economic Policy, aimed at gaining peace with the peasant class, which resulted in the ending of armed resistance to the communists. This support increased the Russian Communist Party’s (RCP) public influence greatly, backed in rural areas as well as urban working class districts. Due to all these factors, Lenin is the most important individual in changing the influence of the Russian communist party between 1905 and 1945.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin had a five year plan, which included an economic plan for a finite amount of time. Most of his plans were usually finished. His five year plan also launched a time when agriculture was there main source of income to an industrialized society. The transformation from agricultural to an industrial society caused for less food for the people therefore led to a massive feminine. Stalin is known for his development of the Terror of the 1930’s. “Stalin purged the party of ‘enemies of the people’, resulting in the execution of thousands and the exile of millions to gulag system of slave labor camps” . According to the website BBC, Stalin is “one of the most powerful and murderous dictators in history. . .His regime of terror caused the death and suffering of tens of millions, but he also oversaw the war machine that played a key role in the defeat of Nazism”…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soviet Union DBQ

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1924, the Soviet Union faced a power struggle when it’s leader and creator Vladimir Lenin died. His successor however, came into power and immediately began to make changes. This man knew exactly what he wanted to keep and more importantly what he wanted to change. His birth name was Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili, but who could possibly rule and leave a legacy with that name? He then adopted the name Joseph Stalin, (which means man of steel.) and began to rule the Soviet Union. At this time, the Soviet Union was well behind all the other countries; Stalin made many changes to the soviet society, employing many methods to achieve his aims.…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Born into a world of change due Russian Industrial revolution, Trotsky was shaped by his historical context and early life. The Revolution took place in the late 19th century. Industrialization was occurring at a fast rate with export of grains and coal increasing, however the working class was still repressed. Trotsky was introduced to a place where change was prevalent, yet nothing had been done for the proletariat. This impacted on his views that became apparent in later life. Trotsky was introduced to Communism in 1897. Being an inexperienced political activist, he was caught and exiled to Siberia. Trotsky was aware of leading Marxist Russians residing in London, including Martov and Lenin, and he escaped to join them. Arriving in 1902, Trotsky established a strong relationship with Lenin, who appreciated his literary abilities. Lenin checked Trotsky’s writing, especially articles for the Communist newspaper ‘Iskra’. However, in the Party Congress of 1903, the Social democratic party split into the Lenin led Bolsheviks and Martov headed Mensheviks. Trotsky stood against Lenin, stating that his theories went against Marxist notion of freeing the working classes. Through the context of his times, and early life experiences, it can be discerned that events…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1922, when Vladimir Lenin died, someone needed to step up and the Soviet Union. As he was slowly dying, a power struggle emerged between Leon Trotsky, and Joseph Stalin. Even though Trotsky “had been widely viewed as the heir of Lenin, it was relatively easy for Stalin to combine with the other Bolshevik leaders in order to head off this threat” (Paley 10). In Lenin’s “Final Testament”, Lenin could already see that Stalin was quickly and surreptitiously gaining power. Stalin’s position of General Secretary gave him the ability to appoint people to important positions. Lenin was also reluctant to see Stalin as his successor because he thought that Trotsky could do a much better job. Lenin believed that Trotsky was the best man in the central…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalinism, the term used to embody the form of government experienced by the Soviet Union under Stalin’s rule, had a significant and lasting impact on the USSR. Stalinism impacted on several aspects of life. Collectivisation was introduced which assisted in the funding of industrialisation, terror was used to create a communist state. Stalin centralised every aspect of life, from the single leadership of Stalin himself to party control of the state and its functions. Free will disappeared and service to the state was expected. Consequently a Stalinist state which had a major impact on the USSR was created.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia was torn between the world war and the population was threatened as levels of starvation rose whilst industry fell. The provisional government could not do much to stop Russia plummeting as they did not have much power and the people of Russia failed to support them (1). The citizens of Russia were desperately looking for help and the Bolshevik party, created with the help of Lenin and Trotsky in the year 1917, had the answer. Slowly, they had managed to become one of the most powerful parties ever created, but many factors were to cause the consolidation of power. In this essay I will be comparing the significance of Vladimir Lenin in the Bolshevik consolidation of power with another important factor; Leon Trotsky.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Khrushchev’s vilification of Stalin in his address to the Twentieth Party Congress was meticulous in detailing precise failures of his predecessor’s rule. Above all, Khrushchev strongly elaborated on Stalin’s extremities, especially the cult of personality that he had built up over the years. The speech also in turn attacked ‘Stalinist repressions, arrests, terror and murders…[and] for bungling foreign affairs and mishandling the war’. Despite this, Khrushchev was cautious in limiting his other criticisms of Stalin, and it was this focus on him as an individual rather than of the overall Soviet system that defined the boundaries of acceptable criticism. As such, the speech sought to condemn Stalin without endangering the party’s validity or the system that had indeed allowed Khrushchev to rise to power.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stalin was paranoid about people trying to not conform and try to rebel against him. 93 out of 139 Central Committee members were killed and 81 of 103 generals and admirals were executed. The secret police in Russia were strong believers of Stalinism and encouraged people to inform on one another. Around 750,000 people were killed as a result of Stalin’s paranoia. In fact, a lot of the deaths during his rule were because he had a political competitor killed or citizens were killed due to harsh laws.…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is where his use of propaganda came in. What is propaganda? You can think of it as information that is spread for the purpose of promoting some cause. If you look at Document Ten, you can see how he was portrayed by many different artists. Well, the artists really didn’t have a choice but to portray him in a positive way. This is where you can finally see the “evil” side of Joseph Stalin. He used force to get what he wanted and many people didn’t see it. Eventually, his Five Year Plans backfired and really sent the peasants into an even deeper level of poverty. Not only did he send some of the peasants into even more poverty that they were already in, he even killed some of them or put them in work camps and starved them to death. (Document Seven). He wasn’t going to let anybody stand in his way and if they tried, he would kill them off just like…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some would argue that his totalitarian personality shaped the purges. It is believed that Stalin had extreme paranoia. This meant that he was sickly suspicious of everyone. Everywhere he looked he would see enemies or spies, ready to betray him. This would mean that Stalin felt that he had no choice. The purges were a way to deal with the intense paranoia he was carrying around with him. He felt he had so many enemies the only way to remain as leader of the Soviet Union would be to dispose of them. He had to tend to his totalitarian personality and convince himself he was always in complete control. He used the purges as a controlling weapon; terror was the way to control people, and the way they acted. It could be concluded that it was in fact Stalin’s state of mind and his dangerously flawed personality which meant that he felt he had no choice. Alternately, putting aside Stalin’s state of mind, you could argue that Stalin was acting in the interest of the party and the revolution; he believed that his removal from leader or the reversal of his policies would be disastrous for the Soviet Union. We therefore need to look into external factors of the culture Stalin reigned…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anyone that expressed some kind of intellectual freedom that did not agree with Stalin's policies was in danger of being caught by the NKVD. Yezhov made a list of groups that were seen as "Anti-Soviet Elements'. This is list included scientists, artists, writers and musicians, even managers and administrators. What all these people had in common was that they had interests and ideals that were different from the party. That's why they were singled out. Stalin was known to be paranoid as part of his personality, that is why he had to target…

    • 3370 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin had eliminated all likely potential opposition to his leadership by late 1934 and was the unchallenged leader of both party and state. Nevertheless, he proceeded to purge the party rank and file and to terrorize the entire country with widespread arrests and executions. During the ensuing Great Terror, which included the notorious show trials of Stalin's former Bolshevik opponents in 1936-1938 and reached its peak in 1937 and 1938, millions of innocent Soviet citizens were sent off to labour camps or killed in prison.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Farm

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Stalin was so obsessed with the idea that people were trying to destroy him and his government that any accidents or errors of the doubters were considered intentional sabotage. People with foreign sounding names were also accused of being foreign spies. As a result of so many purges, the people of Russia feared the government and recognized Stalin’s power, which is what he wanted. Some of the Russians that Stalin had killed were even devoted to Bolshevism. Throughout Stalin’s time as leader, failure increased, mostly due to him killing so many citizens. When Stalin was not accusing people within Russia though, he blamed any of Russia’s agricultural, industrial, or construction failures on his opposers outside of Russia. In addition, there were no limits on the blood purges. Therefore the blood purges victimized around 1.5 million people and killed 680,000 people in 1937-1938 (time period of the Great Purge). “About 100,000 Party members (from Stalin’s government) were arrested, often tortured to confess concocted charges, and sent to concentration camps” (The Great Purges 5). In the end however, the purges did not succeed in eliminating Russia of the problems it was supposed to (The Great Purge 1, 4, and 5).…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of this investigation is: “To what extent was Leon trotsky more valuable to the Bolsheviks and the Russian Revolution, rather than Vladimir Lenin, his superior?”…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays