Preview

Explain why the NEP was unpopular with many communists in the 1920 USSR

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
586 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain why the NEP was unpopular with many communists in the 1920 USSR
Explain why the NEP was unpopular with many Communists in the 1920s USSR.

The New Economic Policy, known as the NEP was an economic system used in the USSR 1921-1928. The NEP was introduced after war communism. This was because war communism involved kulaks and other peasants being forced to give up their crops in order to support the army, this in turn made them quite upset and angry which made them destroy crops. This meant that the growth of crops and food was falling back to 1913 standards and Lenin had to do something about it so he brought about the NEP. This was particularly good at the time as it allowed individuals the opportunity to make money and do well for themselves. But it was unpopular to many communists.
Firstly, it was unpopular because the communists believed that it did not fit in with Marxist ideology, as they believed the NEP was deeply flawed. There was private enterprise which meant that some people were making a profit out of others labour. Marx believed that the political superstructure of every society was based on its economic base and the NEP went totally against the principle of public good.
Also another reason why the NEP was so unpopular with the Communists was because of the split it made in the party. The left and the right, the left believed in the in ending the NEP and begin rapid industrialisation however the right believed in keeping the NEP and encouraged the peasants to become richer. This had a negative effect on the communists especially as the government was a part of a democratic centralism which meant that they decided all the decisions and policies centrally this organizational method describes the freedom of members of the political party to discuss and debate matters of policy and direction, but once the decision of the party is made by majority vote, all members are expected to uphold that decision. By the left and right opposing one another this meant that the main party members and members of the Politburo who

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The first reason is that Stalin, Bukharin, Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev had different ideologies which contradicted each other, the rules and the practices that Lenin already had in place. Trotsky represented the left wing of the party and believed in the rejection of the New Economic Party, being committed to immediate industrialisation and permanent revolution which was completely different to Bukharin who was on the right wing of the party. Bukharin believed in acceptance of the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation but in the distant future and wanted socialism in one country. On the other hand, Stalin was in the centre which meant that he had a pragmatic commitment to the NEP, he was committed to industrialisation in the near future and socialism should be in one country, which are both similar to Bukharin’s ideas on the right wing. Zinoviev and Kamenev swapped from right to left in 1925, which lost them credibility with the party. The fact that most of the contenders had such different ideas about how to run the country would have caused a struggle because they would not have been able to agree on something between them and would have been competing…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * National policy; 1878. The National Policy was a Canadian economic program introduced by John A. Macdonald's Conservative Party in 1876 and put into action in 1879. It called for high tariffs on imported manufactured items to protect the manufacturing industry. Macdonald campaigned on the policy in the 1878 election, and defeated the Liberal Party, which supported free trade. Three main parts; 1) The settlement of the west 2) The building of a transcontinental highway 3) The adoption of protective tariff. This was influenced by the heavy reliance on trade.…

    • 14210 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The words of Leon Trotsky, said decades before the eventual demise of central planning, highlight the underlying flaw of the planned economic system; lack of information. The central planner’s realized that the information and signaling required for any modern economy could be found more effectively in a market based system and consequentially central planning was abandoned. The systemic failure of central planning due to poor information was most prevalent in Eastern Europe and the USSR, as evidenced by their economy’s productive inefficiencies, allocative inefficiencies and pricing difficulties. This essay will classify the traditional soviet economy and examine the production, allocation and pricing difficulties which caused its end.…

    • 2648 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During this time many people were angry at the upper class and the government for not taxing the rich more for the unemployed. The idea of socialism sounded great because the government would control business and that in theory would restore the economy.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Maddison

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When Stalin rose to power in the late ‘30s to early ‘40s, he made sure anyone who could rise against him was removed from the picture. Anyone who had a differing opinion, and could act against him, he had hunted down and killed. Leon Trotsky, a political rival who could have potentially spoke out against him allowing people to see behind the curtain Stalin was pulling over their eyes, was chased out of the Soviet Union with a price on his head. Military commanders who could have potentially disagreed and led the military against Stalin were also hunted down and murdered by Stalin’s police. By removing the voice of the people, Stalin was able to take complete control of his people, without having to worry about the possibility of a revolt. Without factions, governments are able to take complete control away from the…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels Communism supports, “Abolition of property,... a graduated income tax,... abolition of all rights of inheritance,... a national bank with state capital,... centralization… of communication and transport…” The allowance of government control causes many…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commanding Heights Essay

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Lenin’s hardcore Communist policies were a disaster in the USSR: Food production and industrial output virtually collapsed and the county started falling apart. He had to abandon the most extreme Communist practices early on because they just didn’t work in real life.…

    • 7534 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being a democratic society, it is in the Governments best interest to only introduce policy favourable to the electorate; after all, without the electorates backing all that would result is the undesirability of the party and a loss of power. Going forth, each individual party will hold a particular set of ideologies and findings introduced unto them are that do not hold similar are likely not to be accepted. These results can be manipulated to help them be accepted by the government or public.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the Russian Revolution of October 1917, the Bolsheviks rose to power. During this time, the Soviet Union was involved in the First World War, which had devastating effects on its economy. There were shortages on essential supplies including food, clothing, and fuel. Levels of agricultural and industrial production were down compared to levels in 1913. Economic breakdown, civil war and irrepressible inflation accompanied the Russian Revolution of October 1917. Due to these circumstances, the Bolsheviks moved to nationalize all economic property. They took control of industry and trade and declared all private enterprise illegal. In essence, money lost its value. Due to what is now known as War Communism, the majority of resources were allocated to the civil war fronts. In rural Russia, land was seized and redistributed to be worked using limited resources and equipment. Any surplus in production was seized by the state, completely eliminating incentive to produce any surplus at all.…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to assess whether the NEP was in fact successful, it is necessary first to examine the situation prior to its adoption. Many have argued that the New Economic Policy was adopted as a result of the failures of War Communism; the government had experienced great difficulty in feeding the urban population and the peasants soon discovered that war communism entailed the forcible confiscation of their grain to feed the cities. This idea angered many of the peasants, who were left starving while their food was exported to feed those people living in the cities. By the autumn of 1920 it was clear that Bolshevik Russia was in ruins; industrial output was minimal, railway rolling stock was dilapidated and economic life rested on a primitive system of barter. It was obvious, therefore, that some form of economic reform was necessary.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the fact that the Party only started off by attempting to attract working class communities, the middle class population also had they’re reasons to support this radical right-winged party. The Middle class feared the communist revolution occurring at the time because they would most likely refuse to share they’re wealth for financial equality so it would only be impractical not to support the party with the opposite views.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The values that characterize a Centrally Planned Economy greatly opposes the beliefs of a Free Market Economy, therefore making the economic system to ultimately reflect principles of liberalism to a limited extent. A Planned Economy is founded off the belief that individual’s need economic guidance, instituted by the government’s decisions, to as a result provide for more efficient use of resources. Specifically, Karl Marx believed that a Capitalist system led individuals to become ultimately selfish due to an increase nature of greed, in which private property helped promote. Marx’s philosophy of Capitalism was supported by the drastically increasing economic and social inequality that was present during the Industrial Revolution. However,…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communism in the USSR was doomed from the onset. Communism was condemned due to lack of support from other nations, condemned due to corruption within its leadership, condemned due to the moral weakness of humanity, making what is perfect on paper, ineffective in the real world. The end of this system was very violent. It left one of the two most powerful nations in the world fearful of what was to come. <br><br>Communism can either be called a concept or system of society. In a society that follows the communist beliefs groups own the major resources and means of production, rather than a certain individual. In theory, Communism is to provide equal work, and benefits to all in a specific society. Communism is derived from many ancient resources, including Plato's Republic and early Christian communities. In 1917, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in their Communist Manifesto finalized the philosophy of Communism. ("Communism," Microsoft(R) Encarta(R) 98 Encyclopedia) <br><br>In the beginning, people in Russia thought of Communism as a utopian ideal. (Funk & Wagnall's) The elimination of social classes, and guaranteed employment sounded outstanding to the people who lived in Russia. Communism did call for a role of socialist dictatorship to help control any form of protest. Through persuasive tactics this new government seized power and in 1917 Vladimir Ilich Lenin came to power. Under his control the Soviet Union underwent many radical changes that led to the development of NEP (New Economic Policy). This policy called for some private ownership of the means of production and business. Still the government controlled the majority of production. Throughout Lenin's government there were many achievements. It ended a long civil war against the remnants of the old Czarist military system and established institutions in government. He later died in 1924, and was quickly succeeded. <br><br>In 1924 Joseph Stalin became head of the Soviet Communist Party. He soon became the…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lenin was very successful with his aim in creating Russia into a single party state during that short period of time and was able to change the nature of government. He also introduced new policies such as the New Economic Policies to help the economic problems that Russia was facing however the NEP was…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    China in the 20th Century

    • 3095 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Under the rule of the Communist party, the people owned all the economic areas of…

    • 3095 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays