12 mark plan
P: The most important reason that N2 dissolved the first Duma in 1906 is because they were too radical and unneeded.
E: as the Duma mainly consisted of mainly kadets (constitutional democrats) having the majority of seats (182). One of the first acts was ‘Address to the throne’ in which they asked for things like abolition of the state council and the transfer of ministerial power to the Duma.
E: N2 found this too radical so ignored the requests for 10 weeks. Also N2 had just received a loan from France of 2250 million gold francs so did not need the Dumas help in approving the budget.
R: Therefore the First Duma was dissolved in 1906 as it was too radical and unneeded.
P: The main reason N2 dissolved the second Duma is because of the trouble Stylopin had passing his agrarian reforms.
E: the Duma refused to ratify Stylopin’s agrarian reforms meaning Stylopin had to pass these reforms under Article 87. Stylopin tried to weed out the Duma of the SDs who played the main part in disagreeing with his reforms by accusing them of planning to assassinate the Tsar however the Duma didn’t allow them to be arrested as every member had immunity to this.
E: When Stylopin failed at this attempt he asked N2 to dissolve the Duma and so he did consequently the SD delegated were immediately arrested and exiled and Stylopin significantly reduced the representation of peasants, workers and national minorities in the votes for Dumas.
R: Therefore a key reason N2 dissolved the second Duma in 1907 is because of Stylopin’s trouble in passing reforms.
P: N2 dissolved the first two Dumas as they were composed of mainly oppositional groups
E:
Conc.
Overall N2 dissolved the two Dumas in 1906 and 1907 because they were being un cooperative and contradictory the Tsarist regime. Therefore this would suggest why Stylopin put into place illegal laws that reduced the representation of oppositional parties such as the Kadets ( constitutional democrats)
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In conclusion, I believe that the Streltsy had a right to revolt as they didn’t have a strong leader at the…
- 425 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
23) Which of the following was an important consequence of the regulatory reforms that follo...…
- 715 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
64. What was the original purpose of the Convention? Describe what special procedures were put into place at the Convention which made the meeting secretive.…
- 1454 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?…
- 824 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…
- 1646 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Firstly, the opposition groups of the Tsar were known as the Populists, the Liberals and the Marxists. Each group had its own ideas on what was needed for Russia and each group wanted change, however, there were many problems within the groups and none of them were willing to work with each other. The Populists who were mainly concentrated on establishing a democratic government used violent tactics such as terrorism and assassinations, the most famous being the assassination of Tsar Alexander II. However, the Liberals, who also wanted to establish some sort of democracy did not agree on using violent tactics, they preferred to discuss things in meetings and banqueting campaigns. The Liberals were the most moderate of the opposition groups and wanted to keep the Tsar, but remove autocracy and have his current power shared between a democratic government. The Marxists, like the other two groups, also wanted to establish some sort of democracy; however, once again, they did not agree on using violence, they preferred to use propaganda campaigns, as did the Populists and Liberals, but not violence. These divisions meant that each opposition group’s strength alone was not enough to achieve their own specific goals and even though the groups did have some tactics such as propaganda in common, it was not enough. If each group had considered changing their tactics or been slightly more lenient, they may have succeeded.…
- 800 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
‘Khrushchev fell from power because he failed to convince the party of the need to carry out fundamental reform in the USSR’…
- 355 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
unitisation of the left and right wing of the Duma and the apparent cooperation between the…
- 896 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
3) Gaitskell became leader after Wilson and agreed on a social democracy rather than a socialist one, but failed to remove Clause IV in 1961…
- 1309 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Not enough government support for the state and Bush really ignored the state for the first week of the storm.…
- 413 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
3. Why were members of the Third Estate dissatisfied with life under the Old Regime?…
- 508 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The rise of Rasputin- he began to meddel with the political appointments and policy decisions. Liberals and socialists began to lose patience and demanded changes…
- 689 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The history of the United States military has been one of contradictions. From the American Revolution to modern times the every branch of the military has evolved into one of the most efficient fighting forces in the world. As society changes so has the military. At times, the service has been at the leading edge inclusion, but it has still…
- 10175 Words
- 41 Pages
Powerful Essays -
a. Rejected the call of those who wished to include the secret ballot in the platform…
- 1254 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
era, a rise in the efforts from larger more powerful groups presented itself once again…
- 802 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays