When asked “what can Moon, Inc do to get its money from Bob Zimmerman?” I would address it by saying if Zimmerman doesn’t pay off what he owes then according to the mortgage contract Zimmerman would foreclose his house and Moon, Inc. would have the right to bid first. My reasoning is that initially the mortgage was taken out for the house and Zimmerman paid back loans toward the bank. If Zimmerman doesn’t pay then the house is foreclosed and the bank gets the right to bid first on credit bid. Now the mortgage for the house belongs to Moon, Inc. and Zimmerman pays back loans to Moon, Inc. Since Zimmerman has stopped paying his mortgage that means that when the house gets foreclosed Moon, Inc. would have the right to bid first on credit bid.…
"How would a lender protect itself when a borrower stops making payments on a loan?"…
As our nation's economy has been declining and struggling to recover for nearly a decade, the finance industry has changed with the times. Payday lending and other short-term financing services are now mainstream funding options for many Americans. Despite the predatory practices and unreasonable interest rates, alternative funding sources are beginning to become the norm - including pawn brokers. Pawning personal items for quick cash is now so common that reality shows like Hardcore Pawn and Pawn Stars and even documentaries like Broke. The Documentary are emerging as slice of life evidence that America's economy is evolving in the 21st Century. However, all pawn brokers are not ruthless capitalists who prey on the poor, and not all pawn shops are created equal.…
The lenders are not responsive to customers who want to cooperate to pay for their debts. Wall street only cares about the money they can generate from this foreclosure.…
The targeted victims distinguish mortgage fraud from predatory lending. In predatory lending cases the borrower is victimized by the illegal practices of the lender or its agents with respect to fees and disclosures relating to the cost of the loan. It is unfortunate that the media, consumer activists, legislators and law enforcement personnel frequently conflate mortgage fraud with predatory lending since it adds unnecessary confusion to an already complex issue and diverts attention and badly needed resources from the fight against true mortgage fraud. 2 The average “take” on a bank robbery is approximately $3,000.00. By contrast, the average straw borrower receives a “cut” of at least $10,000 and the orchestrator’s “take” in a mortgage fraud transaction frequently exceeds $100,000. In a few cases the orchestrator’s take was in excess of $1 million dollars, and in one, the perpetrator, who later fled the country, received $7 million in “profit” from the same-day flip of a mansion. 3 Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, “Mortgage Loan Fraud: An Industry Assessment Based on Suspicious Activity Report Analysis,” November 2006 at 10. http://www.fincen.gov/news_room/rp/reports/pdf/mortgage_fraud112006.pdf (accessed March 8, 2009). 4 See, e.g., “Due Diligence: The Growing Problem of Mortgage Fraud), CBC News, November 9, 2006.…
By a show of hands, how many people are in a financially challenging situation with paying their mortgage? Do you know that you may very well be a victim of predatory lending practices? You may be asking yourself what is predatory lending. Some of us are familiar with the term. For those who are not, I will explain what a predatory lender is and the effect they have had on our communities.…
Many of the Ten Principles of Economics apply to the purchase of a new home. The first principle, which states that people face trade-offs, is the first principle that applies. The reason this applies to this situation is that in order to buy a home a person may not have the money to go out to eat as often or go on trips as much because they have more of a responsibility to make a mortgage payment each month. If they payment is not made then there is a much larger consequence than if the rent payment is not made (Mankiw, n.d.).…
and then pay off the lender, with a 22.5 percent interest rate. In many cases,…
The housing crisis can be summarized as the over evaluation of house values in the late 90’s and early 2000’s,and shortly there after peoples mortgage debt became larger than the decreasing value of their home come 2006. Sub-prime loans can also be blamed; I will further discuss predatory lending techniques. One type of predatory lending practice that mortgage companies will use is to emphasize the payment. When this happens the lender focuses on a numerical monthly payment that you are able to afford. The down side to this car salesmen like approach, is that the details of the monthly payment can be skewed to hurt you down the road in the future while appearing like a good deal in the near future.…
The cause of this mortgage crisis, according to many leading financial experts, was subprime loans and adjustable rate mortgages. These loans encouraged borrowers to assume unaffordable mortgages with the belief they could refinance later with a lower rate. Since 1998 the number of subprime loans borrowers bought homes with was well over seven million. One million of these homes are being lost to foreclosure because homeowners could no longer afford the payment and the loans are now in default. The reason many of these borrowers have entered into foreclosure is a result of these loans. After the initial term has expired, the rate has increased to a much higher rate, therefore leaving a mortgage payment the homeowner cannot afford. These foreclosures are creating an economic tragedy across the nation that is causing the housing and stock markets, the banking industry, and many other job markets severe financial hardships. It is time for the government to intervene into the subprime mortgage crisis and bailout borrowers that are defaulting on their mortgages. I do believe we need the government to step in and assist homeowners that face foreclosure. But the government needs to…
Whether it’s credit card expenses or other unsecured debt, paying down bills can often leave people feeling overwhelmed. Magnifymoney.com released a survey in 2014 that said that more than 40% of all adults have credit card debt with the average balance being more than $10,000. If you were to only make the minimal payment on it, it would take years to pay it off.…
Sadly, some aren’t able to secure a position right away that can allow them the economic capability to start making payment on their loans. It can take up to two years for some college graduates to find a job. In the meantime, those loans are still due and payable. There are all sorts of possibilities for repayment: income-sensitive plans, unemployment deferments, graduated payments, and even forgiveness programs for certain occupations like nurses, teachers, and public servants. But what about the rest of the debt holders? What happens to them if they can’t make their payments?…
Elizabeth Warren states that we've had usury laws in the United States since colonial times, but in the early 1990s, we just very quietly got rid of them. Lenders are out there competing for customers who are already in financial trouble; only the way they're competing is competing to get them in, and then hit them with 29, 35, 40 percent interest rates; $29 fees, $49 fees, $79 fees. ... Those people are like machines that just keep turning out money for the credit cards. Once they're trapped, they can't get out of it. (Warren, 2004) This in turns causes those who cannot repay their debts to go into bankruptcy. Consumer protection such as the Usury laws should be in place to protect those consumers from unjust interest gouging.…
- they cannot use their real estate to acquire loan since it is already under mortage…
Moreover, while lending money to low-income and minority families justifies a higher interest rate due to the risk of debt default, lending money to families that would very unlikely be in the capacity to fully repay their mortgage is a threat to both the financial institution - who would had lost the invested money - and the borrowers who would be forced to face foreclosure; but even more threatening were…