Preview

Explain the principle of the separation of powers found in the US Constitution.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
607 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain the principle of the separation of powers found in the US Constitution.
Explain the principle of the separation of powers found in the US Constitution.
The separation of powers is the main underlying principle of the US Constitution whereby political power is distributed amongst the three branches of government – the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. The branches act both independently and interdependently. The idea was originally of French political thinker Baron de Montesquieu, it was then incorporated by the Founding Fathers into the 1787 codified document. The principle was adopted by the Founding Fathers due to their fear of totalitarianism. Montesquieu argued for separation of powers in his book L’Esprit de Lois, where he stated that separation of powers will avoid tyranny ‘When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person…there can be no liberty.’ On the contrary to the US, the UK’s powers are fused; the Prime Minister is both the executive and part of the legislature. In the US system there is also a separation of personnel, this means that no person can be a member of more than one branch at the same time. When Senator Al Gore was elected vice-president in 1992, he had to resign from the Senate. Similarly, in 2008, Barack Obama too had to resign from the Senate. In this sense, the three branches are fully disconnected.
The term ‘separation of powers’ can in fact be deceptive. As the institutions are separate and not the powers. Richard Neustadt, an American political scientist specialising in the United States presidency, cleared up this perplexity in 1960. He wrote ‘The Constitutional Convention of 1787 is supposed to have created a government of ‘separated powers’. It did nothing of the sort. Rather, it created a government of separated institutions sharing powers.’ Therefore, this doctrine is best thought as one of ‘shared powers’ where the powers are shared through a series of checks and balances.
This separation of power is entrenched in the first three articles of the Constitution,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    t is safe to say that a respect for the principle of separation of powers is deeply ingrained in every American. The nation subscribes to the original premise of the framers of the Constitution that the way to safeguard against tyranny is to separate the powers of government among three branches so that each branch checks the other two. Even when this system thwarts the public will and paralyzes the processes of government, Americans have rallied to its defense.…

    • 325 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Federalist Paper #47, James Madison explicates how one person or group withholding all the power is the definition of tyranny and that, “[L]iberty requires the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” The excerpt from the United States’ Constitution explain the different powers given to each branch of government. For instance, in Article 1, Section 1 it states, “All legislative power herein granted shall be vested in a Congress…” Moreover, the United States’ Constitution explains, “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States.” Additionally, the Constitution states, “The judicial power of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such inferior courts….” Separation of Powers helps guard against tyranny because we prevent a singular branch from ruling over the people and have all the power, the very definition of tyranny. By separating the power of each branch it assures that no one branch overpowers…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    - The U.S. Constitution clearly describes the separation of powers. The members of the executive branch cannot sit in Congress and so forth, but in the Australian Government has what they call an independent judiciary system where the government and parliament are not separated. The ministers can be members of parliament and the Prime Minister can dissolve parliament if he so chooses.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation Of Powers Dbq

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The theory of the Separation of Powers keeps the government in check and ensures that one branch doesn’t become too powerful or else the government would be a monarchy or dictatorship. In document one, it talks about how there are three branches of government: the Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch. The powers of the government are separated between these three branches, sort of like the system of checks and balances, because they didn’t want one branch becoming too powerful and taking over the other branches. In document five it shows how each branch has one main power or job. For example the main power of the Legislative Branch is to make the laws. The Executive Branch has the President and the branch is responsible for carrying out and enforcing the laws. The Judicial Branch has the courts and their main power is to interpret the laws and punish those who have broken the law. The Separation of Powers limit the power of the federal government by making sure one branch does not become too…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The power of the government is separated and shared by the three branches - executive, judicial, and legislative.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Separation of Powers were set to keep from having to much power. The U.S Constitution separated these powers into three different branches. The judicial, legislative, and executive are the three branches that each branch is separate and has independent powers. The powers that each branch is given, is so that they do not conflict with each other. To restrain one branch from becoming higher ranked than the other, checks and balances was brought into the picture.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion Separation of Powers in the American democracy was used to divide the government into three branches: Executive Branch, legislative Branch and Judicial Branch. Each branch has a specific job; one as important as the other. Dividing the duties and specifications of each job, was by far a sense of controlling and balancing which leads to why the constitution created the separation of power. It also demonstrated that the implementation of each specific job was significant in relation to a sense of power. Also in referring to power the principle of federalism was an important part of the constitution. The principle of federalism was included in the Constitution as a way of settling disputes and controversy between the central government and state governments over the interpreting laws. Therefore the principle of federalism offered a sense of balance. The three branches are the executive branch, which enforces laws, the legislative branch, which creates laws, and the judicial branch, which interprets laws. The biggest crisis that was recognized with the laws is that each branch of government was created with the ability to override the other branches decisions. This principle was included in the constitution because the founders…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States Constitution separates powers through the establishment of three branches of government: the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches which operate independently and limit any one branch from exercising too much power.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I feel as if the thought of “separation of powers” that our founding fathers first brought about is not exactly the way it should be. A quote from the website (heritage.org) discussing what the purpose of the separation of powers states, “The argument from liberty holds that separation is needed to prevent tyranny.” With that being said if you think about it, the Executive Branch of Texas has a better example of separation of powers than the Executive Branch of the United States of America. The separation of powers in a democracy is to prevent abuse of power and to safeguard freedom for all (parlament.gv.at). History repeats itself and history shows that if you give one person unlimited power over the people, people will be suppressed and their opinions and words will get more…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tyranny Dbq

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Separation of powers is defined as a system of government in which powers are divided/shared between federal and state governments. Some evidence that described more about the separation of powers came from document B, titled Separation of Powers, was basically about having all power in the same hands, which James Madison defined as tyranny, plus liberty required all powers in the government to be separate. One of the arguments involving the separation of powers was that each branch of government had a different job, which divided the powers.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The separation of powers was proposed by James Madison to prevent the government from having complete control over the country. For example, without it, the president wouldn’t have very much trouble passing laws that are unconstitutional, or doing things that are unconstitutional. The main purpose is to prevent one branch from controlling the power of another and to provide for checks and balances. This system is very effective and limits the control of the president.…

    • 198 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the early years of the United States, the men who began our government had many issues to resolve. The Separation of Powers in the American democracy is where the early government decided to separate the branches of government into three separate areas. The separation was enacted due to keeping the government from having one person in total control and having a tyrannical form of government instead of a democratic form for the people. The writers of the Constitution; or Framers, were the earliest form of government and thought by following the rules and agendas that they had been following for more than 100 years, that the government would be better…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A separation of powers is where not all the power is given in one place, instead, it is divided between three different branches. This worked because the people did not want a tyrant to rule the country, instead the power is divided up in our three different branches of our government. The Legislative (Article Ⅰ), Executive (Article Ⅱ), and Judicial Branch (Article Ⅲ). Article Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ of the Constitution lists the powers and limits to the power of the government. The legislative branch has the power to make laws while the executive branch carries out and enforces…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of powers is the process of the United States government in which powers and responsibilities are divided among the federal and state governments. Powers not given to the federal government in the Constitution are given to the states. The federal government is made up of three branches: Executive branch, Legislative branch and Judicial branch.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Checks And Balances

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The principle of separation of powers, as implemented in drafting the Constitution, was based on several values generally held: the separation of government into three branches, legislative, executive, and judicial; the idea that each branch performs its own unique and identifiable functions that are appropriate to each; and the limitation of the personnel of each branch to that branch, so that no one person or group should be able to serve in more than one branch simultaneously. Since the judicial, executive, and legislative branch of the government all held power, the framers began to develop a system of checks and balances to guarantee that governmental power would not be conducted in an abusive manner. However, the constitution went much further than the mere separation of powers. It also established an elaborate system of checks and balances. The framers believed that in order to steer clear of a monarchy such as the one they had been used to under Britain’s rule, they would have to come up with a system of checks and balances which still prevails to this day. By implementating this system of checks and balances, they…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays