Preview

Explain The Major Issues That Divided Our Nation In The 19th Century

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
253 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain The Major Issues That Divided Our Nation In The 19th Century
There were many major issues that divided our nation in the early days of the 19th Century. One of the major issues was the expansion of America. America was conquering more and more land which lead to disagreements about what to do with the land. This led to Americans building roadways and waterways. American’s were fighting over land and wanting more slaves to work on their lands.
There was another issue which was that the Northern states believed that slavery was against the consitiution and it should be abolished. While the Southern states wanted to keep slaves working their lands and not only wanted to keep the ones they had but get more slaves since their land were expanding. There was a lot of tension between the North and South due
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3
    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rob Heaney dbq 11 3

    One of the first main issues that required compromise to create a reasonable solution was the enactment of tariffs on the south. The main export of the south was cotton. Cotton was what supplied the south with almost all of its money. In about 1828 to 1833 the first major conflict between the north and south was created during the Tariff or Nullification Crisis. In 1828, the North enacted a tariff on the south that severely affected their cotton trade. The tax rates were as high as forty five to fifty percent. The tariffs were nicknamed the "Tariffs of Abominations" because the south was so disgusted at the high rates it was facing. The south spoke out against these high rates and the north lowered the tariff rates to thirty three percent. Despite lowering the tariff, South Carolina decided that they were not going to follow the tariff, and not pay it. The reasoning the state had was that they thought they should not have to follow any sort of law or tax that was not beneficial to themselves. South Carolina nullified the tariff and didn't pay them. The north was outraged at this act. The north thought that the if South Carolina was able to repeal the tariff and ignore it, who would be able to stop them from ignoring laws regarding slavery? The north and the federal government were offended and angry. An example of their displeasure is shown in Henry Clay's speech to the Senate when he states "I merely throw out these sentiments for the purpose of showing you that South Carolina having…

    • 890 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your
    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Early Nineteenth Century, Americans Sought to Resolve Their Political Disputes Through Compromise, Yet by 1860 This No Longer Seemed Possible. Analyze the Reasons for This Change. Use the Documents and Your

    The North and South in the nineteenth century were different in lifestyle and morale as well as economy. The north had a booming industrial economy while in the South, cotton was king. Because of this, congress was continuously addressing controversial matters and providing answers that did not satisfy either one side or both. The early 1800s were full of the North and the South making many attempts at reconciliation that just fell short. Among those were the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and the Great Compromise of 1850. Other tempestuous attempts led to the Tariff/Nullification Controversy, anti slavery debates in congress, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Whether it was one side or the other, there was always someone to oppose - and in some cases, defy - the laws put in place, which eventually led to the succession of the southern states and the Civil War.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Overview of Dred Scott's Case
    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Overview of Dred Scott's Case

    The North was angry because people in the north had decided not to allow slavery in their states, and the Dred Scott decision allowed slaves to be brought into their states.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Southern States Violate The Constitution
    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did The Southern States Violate The Constitution

    Southern states felt that the Northern States had violated the constitution viewing the constitution as a contract agreement. Southern States seceding from the union with a republic similar to the ideas of the founding father while implementing slavery and Christianity. Southern States creating the Confederate States of America. The Confederacy fight the war over the idea of restoring the original vision when the United States was first founded. Also, fighting for state rights to govern themselves and their right to own slaves.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation
    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    The Northerners opposed slavery, whereas the agriculture dependent Southerners supported it. It was on this issue that the most acerbic debates took place. For the unity and efficiency of the whole country, both sides gave in and made the most famous of the compromises, the Three-Fifth Clause, which won unanimous approval. Not wanting to loose the valuable revenues from the South, the Northerners compromised again in the Constitution by prohibiting Congress from outlawing the slave trade for at least twenty years in order to appeal to the masses. Was this necessarily the right and just decision? No. But it undeniably guaranteed the South as a part of the…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Missouri Compromise Analysis
    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Missouri Compromise Analysis

    These views maintained continuity from earlier abolitionists like the Society of Friends during the Revolutionary Era. While questioning slavery, the North also took political approach. Knowing that ending slavery altogether was highly unlikely, the northern states still wanted to make sure that southern states did not outnumber them inside Congress. As people migrated into new lands that were gained from the Louisiana Territory, tensions rose higher. They were pretty high when Missouri applied for statehood as a slave state. If Missouri was allowed to enter as a slave state, then the free states would be overpowered in Congress. Maintaining a political balance of power was very important to both the North and the South as neither wanted to be subdue to the views of the other. Political actions were taken during the Missouri Compromise to ensure that slavery did not exceed the 54’ 40” line. This line was put into place to ensure that slavery did not expand northward or westward. In addition, the state of Maine was brought into play the very next year which maintained an equal number of free and slave states. The…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Northern Slavery
    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Northern Slavery

    Most Northerners didn’t hate slavery enough to do anything about it. Sadly, it was an ugly part of American culture and people were content ignoring it so they could go about their lives. They didn’t agree with slavery but they feared that if the slaves were freed they would move north and take jobs away from white families. White people in the North were expanding westward into the territories where they could farm their own land and make money off crops. They did not want the territories to have the southern slave based labor system because it would only benefit a few wealthy people and it would greatly harm the country’s economy to expand slavery.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of George Washington's Abolition Of Slavery At The Philadelphia Convention
    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of George Washington's Abolition Of Slavery At The Philadelphia Convention

    They debated hours over whether or not they would abolish slavery in the constitution if so to how much to an extent because you have to realize that the people the south wanted to keep slaves but the people of the north wanted to abolish slavery so of course they could not come to an agreement.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Missouri Compromise's Role In The Civil War
    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise's Role In The Civil War

    While the southern states were in favor of slavery, the northern states vehemently opposed the idea. An expansion of slavery would have meant an increase in the territorial space and population. This in turn would give the Southern states increased power in the House. Although the Civil War had some time to initiate, the Compromise played a major role in the laying the groundwork for the war that was to come. It contributed to the division and disagreement between north and south, surrounding the topic of slavery. The issue built severe tension between the two sides of the…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Killer Angels
    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Killer Angels

    The North, on the other hand, was fighting in the beginning to preserve the Union. However, later the focus changed to the ending of slavery after the Emancipation Proclamation.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Compromises
    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Constitution Compromises

    Slavery was also an issue that saw a lot of dispute. Generally, Abolitionists in the North wanted to abolish slavery completely; however, this didn’t sit right with the South, whose economy desperately depended on slaves to flourish. There were two compromises about slavery. The first compromise ended the slave trade, and the second addressed the accounting of slaves in a state’s population for the census, as well as taxes. Being that the northern views were already stepping on the South’s toes, they couldn’t afford any clash to bring about talk of a separation from the union. Their decision to account 3/5 of a slave when apportioning taxes and representatives favored neither…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Westward Expansion Essay Example
    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Westward Expansion Essay Example

    Slavery was a big issue, many anti-slavery leaders came out strong against adding another potential slave state to the Union. The basic concerns were - war…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differences Between Civil War And Reconstruction
    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page

    Differences Between Civil War And Reconstruction

    The first issue is about Freedom, the slaves are still legal in south while north outlawed slavery, which causes tension between south and north. The North were fighting so hard to oppose slavery while the south were opt out on slavery.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was The Civil War Inevitable
    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Why Was The Civil War Inevitable

    They depended greatly on the North for their industries and factories, because they had very few. They also opposed federal spending on internal improvements and they wanted no tariffs. Even despite having a somewhat weak economy, the South wanted to gain their independence to become their own country, and to have their own way of life, which included slavery as legal. When Abraham Lincoln was elected in 1860, the South thought that they would have no voice in the government, considering that Abraham Lincoln was against slavery. In hopes of being their own country, the South had no intention of fighting a war. However, before the war started, the South was unwilling to compromise. They thought that slavery should be allowed in all of the territories. They disagreed to the Missouri Compromise and to parts of the Compromise of 1850. Many felt that these compromises were unfair and biased. The South felt that their way of life and views on slavery were right and just. They turned to what they thought was their only choice: seceding from the Union. This enrage the North, which was one of the main causes of the Civil War.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Slavery In South
    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Slavery In South

    The South did not undergo the same industrial revolution that was starting in the North, in fact the Southerners stayed almost completely rural and lagged in modernization very increasingly. Examples of this include indications such as public education at the time and railroad construction. Because of all of this the Southerners felt as if slavery was indeed a necessity and their agricultural economy orbited around slavery. Many Southerners feared that the abolition of slavery would eventually result in an economic collapse. The biggest difference between the South and the North was purely ideological. In the North, slavery was abolished and small groups of abolitionists developed. In the South however, white spokesman, from political to ministers and etc. all rallied behind slavery and treated it as the bedrock of southern…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics