Preview

Explain The Four Purposes Of Punishment

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
903 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain The Four Purposes Of Punishment
The four main purposes of punishment in the criminal justice system are:
Deterrence - this is something intended to discourage someone from commiting a crime through instilling fear as to the consequences for their actions. There are two types of deterrence - specific deterrence and general deterrence.
Retribution - its purpose of punishment is to administer justice - a deserved or morally right consequence to the offender that committed the crime.
Rehabilitation - this punishment aims to reform an offender’s behaviour from reoccurring and prevent recidivism. This is achieved by conducting sentencing options and programs including anger management courses, alcohol programs as well as drug rehabilitation and counselling programs.
Incapacitation
…show more content…
The prosecution establishes this by proving the accused carried out this act by using witness testimony and physical evidence.
Mens rea is a term meaning the ‘guilty mind’ of the accused’s mental state. The prosecution establishes this by proving that the accused to the necessary degree intended to commit the crime.
There are three main levels of mens rea which are: Intention, Recklessness, and Criminal negligence
Causation is a term referring to the relationship between the cause of the accused behaviour or actions and the effect of that, the result in committing the crime. The prosecution establishes this usually by proving the actus reus and also proving the substantial link between the act and the crime.
During the investigation process the four young people were questioned as to their knowledge of the murder. A month after the murder took place one of the teenagers was arrested and charged with murder. One of the four young people told police that David Laxale was responsible for the concluding death. This then resulted in the remaining three sixteen year olds pleading guilty to assault occasioning actual bodily harm. Choi Kia Tang was sent to trial for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Mens Rea: The guilty mind. Done with criminal intent or knowledge that what he/she did was against the law.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Making an individual afraid to commit the crime again by threat of the same punishment or a harsher punishment.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The second is retribution; this means that they punishment needs to fit the crime. A judge will not sentence someone to five years for a traffic violation and give a convicted murder just a few days. Judges need to take into account the full impact the crime had on everyone.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    State and federal

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sentencing has four major goals that are normally attributed to it: deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution. Retribution is from the 21 centuries model of “just deserts.” The main idea is that if someone breaks the law they should be punished. The other three uses more emphasize on protecting the public. The way they go about is how they differ. Deterrence focuses on the burdensome aspect of a punishment. This makes the offender think about what he or she is, has, or is about to do. This is to make a rational thought that the chance of getting caught is too high, not worth the risk. The idea is to make the person (specific deterrence) who may commit the crime so afraid of the punishment, and detour others (general deterrence) from committing the same crime.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing Paper

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sentencing is very important and usually the last stage of the criminal process. The purpose of sentencing is to punish the criminals while at the same time stopping crime from continuing. The five philosophical reasons for sentencing are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and restoration. Retribution is the philosophy that those who commit criminal acts should be punished based on the severity of the crime and that no other factors need be considered. Deterrence is the strategy of preventing crime through the threat of punishment. It assumes that potential criminals will weigh the costs of punishments versus the benefits of the criminal act so then the punishments will more then likely be more severe. Incapacitation is a strategy for preventing crime by detaining wrongdoers in prison, separating them from the community and reducing criminal opportunities. Then there is rehabilitation, which is the philosophy that society is best served when wrongdoers are not simply punished, but provided the resources needed to eliminate criminality from their behavioral patterns. Restoration is a sentencing goal that seeks to address the damage by making the community and the victim “whole again”.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The term punishment is defined as a penalty that is imposed on an individual for doing wrong. When an individual does something that is not…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Actus Reas and Men Rea

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Actus reus and mens rea are two of the five elements of a crime that the prosecution may have to prove to get a conviction in a criminal case. Actus reus is the criminal act. Mens rea is the intent to commit the crime. In general, the more serious a crime is, the more important it is for the prosecution to prove that both a criminal act was committed and that there was criminal intent. These more serious crimes are also known as conduct crimes. Not surprisingly, conduct crimes involve the proof of criminal conduct. Criminal conduct is often confused with criminal acts. The distinction is that criminal conduct involves both actus reus and mens rea, whereas a criminal act only involves actus reus. In the most severe of crimes, such as criminal homicide, three more elements of crime must be proven: concurrence, attendant circumstances and a bad result. Actus reus and mens rea are important because both elements are necessary to get a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt in a criminal case (Samaha, 2008, chap. 3).…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    MENS REA

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a general rule, unless a person has committed the necessary ' 'actus reus ' ', one cannot be found guilty; nevertheless there are some exceptions. Now, it is suitable to see that ‘‘mens rea, in Anglo-American law, criminal intent or evil mind. In general, the definition of a criminal offense involves not only an act or omission and its consequences but also the accompanying mental state of the actor… ' '…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elements of Crime

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Mens rea refers to the crime's mental elements of the defendant's intent. This is a necessary element—that is, the criminal act must be voluntary or purposeful. Mens rea is the mental intention (mental fault), or fudge the defendant's state of mind at the time of the offense, sometimes called the guilty mind. It stems from the ancient maxim of obscure origin, "actus reus non facit reum nisi mens sit reas" that is translated as "the act is not guilty unless the mind is guilty." For example, the mens rea of aggravated battery is the intention to do serious bodily harm. Mens rea is almost always a necessary component in…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Punishment:When a crime is committed many may wonder why it happened, but most everyone believes that the person that committed the crime should be punished. The concept of justification for punishment is to deter deviant behavior. Retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation and societal protection are the four justifications for punishment currently used in today 's society. These four forms of punishment are used in today 's society in an attempt deter criminal activity and to lower crime rates. Research of the four justifications of punishment will reveal which type of punishment deters crime most effectively as well as if the consequences of punishment provide any benefit for criminals and society.…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Purpose of punishment.

    • 1364 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within the English legal system there are four main theories of punishment; retribution, deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation. The retributive theory looks back to the crime and punishes because of the crime. The remaining three all look forward to the consequences of punishment and thereby hope to achieve a reduction in crime. They are therefore often termed consequentialist or utilitarian theories. The boundaries between these theories are far from clear, containing sub-categories, many of which are perceived quite differently by different writers. To establish why it is we punish, each theory will have to be examined closely.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The four goals of punishment that a judge will consider, when imposing a sentence are: deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution. These four justifications of criminal punishment have varied in main ways. While closely associated with utilitarianism, the deterrence and incapacitation strive to reduce imminent crime. Deterrence struggles to generate crime more costly, so less crime would transpire.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Actus Reus

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mens Rea is an element of criminal responsibility, a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and wilfulness.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theories of Punishment

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In my criminal law class at law school, we discussed four basic theories of “why we punish”: deterrence (“to keep them from doing it”), incarceration (“to keep those who do it away from us”), rehabilitation (“to help them stop doing it”), and retribution (“because they deserve it”). Any punishment should fall in line with your basic theory of punishment.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aims of Sentencing

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tariff sentences – Idea that each offence should have a set tariff with the judge being allowed only to impose a penalty within the tariff range. This removes nearly all discretion from judges. Problem when applying to fines - takes no account of the financial position of the offender.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays