Preview

Explain the Concept of Ideals in Plato’s Writings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
622 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain the Concept of Ideals in Plato’s Writings
Explain the concept of Ideals in Plato’s writings

“The unexamined life is not worth living” according to Plato. He argued that we should always pursue knowledge and ask questions to do this. A key part of Plato’s philosophy is epistemology – his theory of how we know things. His concept of Ideals, also known as Forms, is Plato’s explanation of how true knowledge can be sought.

Plato understood that there are concepts that we can all recognise in various things, for example the concept of beauty. We all recognise beauty in art, nature, people, or music, and we all understand the idea when we hear the word used. Although we can all recognise beauty, our opinions of what classes as beautiful are widely varied and subjective. The conclusions Plato drew from this is that beauty must exist, otherwise we would not know it at all. This is the Perfect Form of Beauty. However, we must have only partial knowledge of it or we would not have subjective opinions.

Forms are absolute versions of concepts and ideas. They are perfect ideas of everything and therefore they do not change – perfect things cannot change for the better and would not change for the worse. They are also eternal as to begin or to stop existing is a change. They cannot live in this world as it is constantly changing and forms are unchangeable, so they can only exist in the Realm of the Forms. The form of Beauty is absolute and true; it is not an opinion but an idea or concept, therefore no-one can know the real meaning of Beauty as it cannot exist in this world and it is eternal. We will never know forms fully as we are imperfect.

Forms give us knowledge and allow us to have some understanding of the truth. Although, we know that we do not know them fully as we can form our own opinions on things, e.g. what is beautiful and what is not. Forms are in the Realm of the Forms, we can recognise them as this is where our soul originates from, however because they come from there and not from

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The theory of the Forms suggests that there are two worlds in which we live, one is through reality (world of Forms), whilst the other is accessed through our minds (world of Particulars). He highlights that there is only one of each Form while there are many copies of that Form, however, they all share common factors to the Form allowing them to be recognised and compared to. Plato describes the Forms to be perfect, eternal and un-changing whereas the Particulars are imperfect, finite and changing. This can be related to Plato’s conflicting ideas about education in his era, as he believes that the world of Particulars is based on opinion rather than knowledge and so does not approve of this world- the theory of the Forms and the Form of the Good allowed him to express these views showing how the Forms portray the creation of a better, conceptual world. Additionally, Plato describes the Forms to be intelligible, rational and non-corporal which means that his world of Forms cannot be accessed physically and so disproved. This therefore shows the Particulars to be material and corruptible which became a strong ground for us to relate to his theory as the imperfection and continuously changing world…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Plato and other prominent philosophers such as Plutarch and Heraclitus were observing the world, they came to the conclusion that it was in a state of flux; they came to the conclusion that it was constantly changing. Plato wrote a number of texts including Phaedo and Republic; this worked with his dualistic approach concluding that our realm of appearances – or our world; and all within is changeable and will eventually cease to exist. He says that this world is nothing but a mere copy of forms, and the forms are described as the eternal and perfect idea of what a thing is. The world of the forms, to Plato is the only realm where true knowledge lies, Plato defined this as the realm of reality; this could in fact be trusted unlike our own world. There are a few reasons to Plato as to why The Forms exist, and these reasons are present through his work for example through The Theory of Recollection, and The Imperfection Argument. But several philosophers have critiqued Plato’s notion and they argued Plato’s arguments are actually just reasons for why forms should exist; rather than actual proof of the existence. Furthermore, The Third Man Argument in Plato’s ‘Parmenides’ brings a prominent problem for the theory of The Forms. For example, Russell called it ‘One…

    • 2371 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato understands that only a person how has gotten the idea of good can get the best knowledge since the idea of good is the best of the virtues possible, and he also understands that only the people who have gotten the idea of good and thus the best…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hup 102 Short Paper #2

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper I will be discussing the view on the forms, of both Plato and Aristotle. For starts, Plato’s views on the Forms are basically describing the true meaning about material objects in the world. Like for example viewing a desk in a class room, should be looked at as more than just what we see, but thousands of atoms put together to make it look like a desk or something like that. His idea of an object was defined by what we might think something is it’s basically a form of something else. He said that we could be sitting on a chair but its quality is of an object which form is that of a chair. This idea of the form by Plato exists in a heavenly realm that could be understood by the mind. Plato’s views on the forms were aspects of everyday life, anything from a table to a bench As well as ideas and emotions. The essence of Plato's theory of Ideas Forms lay in the conscious recognition of the fact that there is a class of entities, in which the best name is probably universal, that are entirely different from sensible things, which is interesting. Plato's theory of Forms assumed that Forms are universal and exist as substances. On the other hand, Aristotle firmly disagrees with the idea of Forms being universal.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Socrates To Meno

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The theory of the forms is this idea that everything we see in the world is an aspect of some perfect form. These perfect forms do not exist in the world, but our immortal souls that have all knowledge know these perfect forms, and we perceive everything in the world as aspects of these forms. When we see beautiful objects we are seeing things that exhibit aspects of the form of beauty, and when we see ugly things we see things exhibiting aspects of the form of the ugly and so on. Again these perfect forms do not exist in reality, but within our immortal souls we have them, and therefore when we see these beautiful things or ugly things we recollect this form. In the argument in the republic we create three categories. There is ignorance which is what is not, knowledge comprises what is, and belief comprises the middle ground in both what is and what is not. In this argument knowledge would be the forms, the forms are perfect they are what actually is unchanging and infallible. Ignorance is simply falsehoods things that don’t exist. Beliefs is the tricky part in this argument. Everything we can observe would be in the belief category. While we can see things that exhibit aspects of the forms they aren’t totally the form. For example the same woman one man sees as beautiful could be seen as ugly by another. Therefore this woman would exhibiting two forms, and not totally either one she…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Plato uses the forms to discuss almost everything. Forms are general concepts that are used to classify different physical concepts. The forms are non physical, mental concepts. Plato utilizes the forms to prove mind-body dualism. The forms are real things, they exist, and are considered to be more real than physical things. It refers to things that are eternal, perfect, unchanging, and universal. The mind is also eternal, not the brain. Forms are concepts or ideas that help categorize objects. The essence of the Forms is concept and this makes it different from physical objects, and for this reason makes it endless. The senses are not the basis of true knowledge, as they are physical, because they are temporary, changing,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato describes the world of Forms as ‘unchanging’ in the fact that everything that has yet to be invented in the world of senses already exists in the world of Forms as its perfect version. Plato also believes that that quality’s, such as truth, beauty and justice, all have a universal existence, a reality of their own and Plato believes that we have an innate knowledge of their true Forms. They act ad s cause, source, or necessary, a primary condition for the existence of secondary objects (such as chairs) and actions in the world.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Plato’s argument is that man must amass knowledge by being open minded, only then can he truly work towards the true understanding of “the good”. The good in this case is the ability to make your own judgments and decisions and allow yourself to govern your life. By publishing this, Plato hoped to get people to think on their own and begin to question things and not just accept whatever is presented to them.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One thing I can say that is of complex to me somewhat is the idea of the philosophical term form, in which something is just that and not subjected to change. I get the meaning of it by how it is something that is the exact reality of something, but what I don’t get is the understanding. I have questions like is that something we are to look forward to when we die; the exact form of something? Would we be actually satisfied with this result? I can’t help but wonder what how these forms are going to affect us when we are in another world where our true form is shown.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The physical world moves in time and space, so it is transitory, whereas the Realm of the Forms is outside time and space, so it is transcendental. This means that everything in the world is changing all the time as the years go by but the Forms never change. Therefore, the Forms may not be relevant to the world that we know today, only to the world of the time in which it was created. Consequently our world may be edging further and further away from the Forms all the time, due to the world in which we live constantly developing and changing.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Platonic Forms

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages

    These Forms can only be grasped intellectually, they are non-physical ideas that represent the most accurate reality. In some cases we call the Theory of Forms, Theory of Ideas. For example, take a perfect triangle, this would be a description of the Form, or idea, of a triangle. Plato states these Forms exist in an abstract state, we can try to draw the perfect triangle, but our attempts will fall short.…

    • 1757 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two of the greatest and earliest thinkers of our time are Plato, and his most famous pupil, Aristotle. Soon after Plato’s teachings, Aristotle criticized his claims and independently became a thinker on his own. These philosophers viewed metaphysics differently, and they approached the idea of reality in two opposing ways. Plato’s Theory of Forms was a concept that was defined in a different way by Aristotle. They both believed in “forms” but approached this idea differently.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    How Do I Know What I Know

    • 3404 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Plato theorized that seeking knowledge is independent from the physical world (world perceived by senses), there are two distinct worlds that reflect each other. "The domain where truth and reality shine resplendent," (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor_of_the_sun) is the World of Forms, Plato predicts, which is within your mind and sustains perfection; whereas, our sensory perception is linked to the visible world (the physical world). In the physical world of changing objects Plato sees it as “Everything in this world is always becoming something else, but nothing permanently is.” (Magee The Story of Philosophy 28) According to Plato, the World of Forms is the truest reality because the perception of the physical world is subject to error as it is constantly changing. This would mean we cannot fully rely on our sensory perception to reason but on our priori knowledge (independent thinking from the experience). Unlike the senses, the mind holds innate ideas that aren’t subject to alteration without the person’s consent. An example of priori knowledge is like early astronomers or land personnel guiding space robots; do not gain knowledge from experience when…

    • 3404 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Under the influence of Socrates’ philosophical ideology, Plato was trying to find a solution to the problem that although there is underlying stability in the world (sun comes up every morning), it is constantly changing (you never step into the same river twice). An old theory about this is problem is that we gain all knowledge from our senses empirically. But Plato disagreed with this and described that because the world is constantly changing, our senses cannot be trusted. So, he was actually advocating that we do not learn new things, we remember them or in other words, knowledge is intrinsic. Plato believed that the world is divided into two parts i.e. Reality and Appearance. So, since in reality, everything is in a state of instability, perceived knowledge is not true knowledge but is just a set of opinions, which are subjective to the speaker. However, since the World of Ideas is eternal and immutable, that is where knowledge lays i.e. the truth will never change there. Thus the World of Ideas becomes more real than the World of Appearance. Plato said that in the world, we have an idea of what beauty is – we have an innate knowledge of True Beauty or the Form of Beauty. In the world we have examples of imperfect, reflected beauty e.g. flowers yet we have never seen True Beauty. We are able to recognize or recollect the Form of Beauty in flowers. According to Plato, our souls must have known the Forms (e.g. Beauty, Justice, Tiger) before we were born, which means that they are immortal and so pre-exist and post-exist our bodies. Plato believed…

    • 2584 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russian Formalism

    • 2352 Words
    • 10 Pages

    “Form” is a negative word, methodologically, if not ideologically. That is, the formalists argued at the beginning for a strict separation of form and content and made…

    • 2352 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays