Preview

Explain Should The Supreme Court's Power Of Judicial Review Be Strictly By A Constitutional Amendment

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
289 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Should The Supreme Court's Power Of Judicial Review Be Strictly By A Constitutional Amendment
Should the Supreme Court’s power of judicial review be strictly limited by a constitutional amendment?

The Supreme Court’s power of judicial review should not be strictly limited by a constitutional amendment because the simple fact what if you do a judgment that they are not in the right of? If the judge is proved wrong then it will be appealed. For an example we the people shouldn’t be judged because what if one commits the same crime and does it intentionally such as killing someone and then someone does it to protect them and their family from harm if someone broke into their home and was coming at them and the only thing was to kill them to keep from getting their children or self harmed.

The cons of this is that what if we are
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Discusion Questions His301
    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discusion Questions His301

    The Supreme Court is supposed to interpret the Constitution as it pertains to each case before the court. These decisions then affect public policy and application of the laws. Sometimes laws can be rendered nullified or unenforceable. In some newer cases that deal with internet or other technologies not present at the time of creation, extend beyond the reach of the Constitution, the Supreme Court must interpret how the Constitutional laws should affect the case. This affects the way U. S. society sees the Constitution as it pertains to them.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Miranda Vs. Arizon Supreme Court Case
    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Miranda Vs. Arizon Supreme Court Case

    There are many cases in the history of constitutional law that involve the wording of the United States Constitution. One case that deals with many parts of the constitution is Miranda v Arizona. This was a case that the Supreme Court voted on in 1966. This is a case of upper tier rights, because it deals with the constitutional rights. It mostly deals with the fourteenth amendment which is a right to due process and the sixth amendment which is a right to counsel.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    USpreme Court Case Study
    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    USpreme Court Case Study

    United States Supreme Court cases are argued and decided on Constitutional grounds. All arguments and decisions are based on interpretations of the original Constitution and, more often, on Constitutional amendments.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Does the U.S constitution work?
    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Does the U.S constitution work?

    The first main strength of the U.S constitution is that it’s ability to adapt for changing America. The first ten amendments for example still are vital in American life as they ensure all Americans the basic rights such as free speech, freedom of religion and the right not be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment. These are such vital rights which enable for a free society. Also many amendments are almost inviting for the federal government to interpret them. For example the 16th amendment which allows the federal government to collect income tax it doesn’t state how much income tax to collect and therefore it allows the federal government to decide for itself on what it thinks how much income tax to collect depending on the economic climate. This shows that the U.S constitution can adapt for changing economic times and state of the federal government. Also judicial review enables to federal government to be able to interpret the constitution best suited for that time. For example in 1972 the Supreme…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Essay On How Was The Constitution Used To Establish Our Government
    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Essay On How Was The Constitution Used To Establish Our Government

    Why or why not? Our group believes that the U.S. Supreme Court should have the power to declare an act of congress unconstitutional. The reasoning is judicial review is one of the most important checks on the leg of the Executive Branch within the system of checks and balances. If the Supreme Court could not use judicial review over acts of congress the judicial branch would have little power to stop congress from performing a unconstitutional act such as overruling the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment which gave all citizens the right to protection under the law, or ignoring the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which gave all people the rights equal to those of all…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Supreme Court Major Cases
    • 4278 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Supreme Court Major Cases

    The constitutional issue present in the case was whether or not the Supreme Court had the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether or not they are unconstitutional, making them void. The other Constitutional issue in the case was whether or not Congress can expand the scope the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction beyond that which is defined in Article III of the Constitution.…

    • 4278 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Can the power of the Supreme Court be j
    • 1511 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Can the power of the Supreme Court be j

    The Supreme Court’s most important power is its power of judicial review; which is the principle by which courts can declare acts of either the executive branch or the legislative branch unconstitutional. When looking at the scope of influence that the court has had over many constitutional, social and policy-related issues, it is important to remember that this power is self-given and that the court has not derived this power from another branch or from the electorate. In the case of Marbury v Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall established the power of the court to declare acts of Congress, actions of the president or any member of the federal executive, as well as legislation and actions of the state governments, unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has exercised this power, for example, to revoke state laws that denied civil rights guaranteed by the Constitution, which happened in Brown vs the Board of Education. However, this power also gives them the ability to rule bills which elected bodies, such as the Congress and the President, have pushed for to be unconstitutional. Keeping in mind that the Constitution does not include the power of judicial review for the Court, it can therefore be argued that the Founding Fathers did not specify this power for a reason, and in reality the Supreme Court has over stepped its mark.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment
    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment

    Francis Mejia Period 4 Many parts of the United States Constitution can be interpreted in different ways. This makes it difficult to make decisions on cases because of the many possible ways to look at what is constitutional and what is not. In every court decision, The Supreme Court must carefully analyze and interpret the amendments to the Constitution and apply them. The first Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” One controversial case involving the rules of the First Amendment was Snyder v. Phelps in 2010.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Branch In The 20th Century
    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Judicial Branch In The 20th Century

    "[The Judicial Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” Hamilton explained when analyzing the Judiciary’s initial intent. Article 3 section 1 of the Constitution grants the Supreme court “The judicial Power of the United States.” this power can be given to inferior courts such as circuit and district courts as “Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” Later, in article 3 section 2, the Judicial branch is granted power that “extend[s] to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.” The Judicial branch has explicit power to interpret the intent of past laws, treaties made, and…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitutional Strict Rights
    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Constitutional Strict Rights

    The U.S Constitutional amendments place limits on what law enforcement and how a trial should be governed. These strict rights are to be followed because if an officer fails to abide by the proper procedure, the trial court may forcibly put an end to evidence obtained in violation of proper procedure or even release the arrested suspect. This is an amendment that deals with each of the following: criminal due process, arrest, interrogation, search and seizure, Miranda, punishment, the right to jury trials, and the right to counsel.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review

    views as to whether or not Judicial review, and the Supreme Court as a whole,…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Activism In Canada
    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judicial Activism In Canada

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of the federal government in assisting African Americans achieve their civil rights in the period 1865-1992…

    • 1033 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    ROLE AND FUNCTIONS OF LAW PAPER
    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages

    ROLE AND FUNCTIONS OF LAW PAPER

    Judicial review is the power of the courts to review statutes and governmental actions to determine whether they conform us to rules and principles laid down by the constitutions. Judicial review is also based on the idea that a constitution, which dictates the nature, functions and limits of a government is the supreme law. Accordingly, any actions by a government that violate the principles of its constitution are invalid. In the U.S the most important exercise of judicial review is by the Supreme Court. The court has used its power to invalidate hundreds of federal, state, and local laws that it found to conflict with the constitution of the U.S. The Supreme Court has also used judicial review to order federal, state, and local officials to refrain from behaving unconstitutionally. In all cases the power of judicial review does not belong exclusively to the Supreme Court. In appropriate cases every court in the U.S. may strike down laws that violate the Constitution. The power of judicial review is essential to the practical system of check and balances, a system established by the U.S constitution in 1789. Without the courts possessing the power of judicial review, the political system would be vastly different. Also without…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Importance Of The Fourth Amendment
    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Importance Of The Fourth Amendment

    The Constitution of the United States provides for a system of checks and balance among the legislative, judicial and executive branches of the government. There are 33 amendments to the United States Constitution that Congress proposed as ratification since the Constitution was in effect since 1789. The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution declares that people must be secure in their homes and their persons against unreasonable searches and seizures. Additionally, the fourth amendment is part of the Bill of Rights was adopted by Congress and became effective in 1791. The relationship the fourth amendment has to constitutional rights is having probable cause and any evidence obtained without a warrant, cannot be used in the justice system. The Fourth amendment was evident during a landmark case of Weeks vs. the United States in 1914.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics