Preview

Explain How Successful Was The Congress Of Vienna

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
753 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain How Successful Was The Congress Of Vienna
How successful was the Congress of Vienna in achieving the aims of the peacemakers?

The Congress of Vienna was successful in achieving the aims of the peacemakers, to an extent. They accomplished maintaining the peace and balance of power in Europe for a while and the Congress was able to resolve many of their territorial disputes without difficulty. The Great Powers worked on maintaining the peace in Europe, doing whatever they needed to keep it. For a century they were successful, however, the Congress eventually began to fall apart as the major powers’ self-interest limited their objectives. It was the conflicts that arose, along with unequal representation that they, like many in the past, were successful in the short-term effects, however, fell short when it came to the long term effects.
There was unequal representation in the Congress. Though
…show more content…
The first conflict that came up, was that the French wanted the occupation force withdrawn, because the French government felt that they had less credibility due to the foreign troops on their land. It was then that France was formally admitted into the congress system. Following that was the civil unrest in Spain and Sicily, revolt in Naples, Spain and Greece. The Troppau Protocol was brought up, suggesting that there be “collective resistance to forces of nationalism and liberalism”, proposing that the great powers be given the ability of bringing intervention in domestic affairs. The British didn’t support this, and they withdrew. It was because of the protocol that French troops were sent to Spain to subdue the revolts. However, this resulted in many liberals imprisoned and killed, and France soon withdrew from the congress as well. After this, Austria, Prussia, and Russia worked to keep the peace of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    It was mainly between the Allies (France, Russia, UK) and the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy)…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the war ended, Allied leaders and President Wilson were faced with putting Europe back together the way it was before the war. Certain events led to the Senate’s defeat of the treaty. Wilson was an optimistic progressive, with striking policies for the outlook of Europe. Many of these plans were shut down by other leaders; Wilson still approved the conditions of the Treaty of Versailles because his prime issue, the League of Nations, was still included. Many people of the world did not see the League as a good idea. They wanted and were promised the war to end in a peace and “moralize nationalism”, but the treaty did not reach their expectations (Document B). It planned to prevent effects that were conflicting by using the same things for opposition. It wanted to use force to destroy force, militarism to prevent militarism, et cetera (Document A). Americans recognized that the resolutions projected and allowed by Wilson were condemned to fail.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Castlereagh Vs Wilson

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Concert of Europe was an international order created by a series of alliances that allowed Europe to experience the longest period of peace and stability ever known to the continent. The system aimed to preserve the status quo politically and territorially, and it relied very little on power to sustain itself. Rather, it worked by careful design influenced by the Pitt Plan and the errors of Richelieu’s work of the 1600s. Periodically, the involved nations would convene to discuss and agree on issues that could lead to the outbreak of a war. In this way, the system was able to maintain European peace by consensus. Perhaps the most important reason that the Concert of Europe worked was the sense of shared values that united the countries - a moral equilibrium allowed for power and justice to be in “substantial harmony”. In particular, Prussia, Russia, and Austria, the three Eastern powers, considered their unity as the “barrier to revolutionary chaos”. The system only disintegrated when the moral aspect was removed from European diplomacy - this substantiates a claim that the system’s success can be attributed to the moral equilibrium.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the 28th on June 1914, the world descended into chaos, forced into all-out war through hasty alliances and aggressive manoeuvres. 5 years and 37 million casualties later, a truce was made. The 28th of January in 1919 saw the Palace of Versailles play host to a meeting of the world’s superpowers. Woodrow Wilson of the United States, Lloyd George of the United Kingdom, and Georges Clemenceau of France were all present to re-draw the map of the world, introducing a highly controversial treaty that protected their interests, but pointed all blame to the ‘Triple Alliance,’ consisting of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    II. The leader of the Congress of Vienna was the Austrian foreign minister, Prince Klemens von Metternich.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This was not possible previously. Hence, the Congress was effective in bringing stability to the whole of Europe before World War I…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The 19th century was marked by the uprising of the middle class and the spread of revolutionary ideas caused by the French Revolution, which ultimately led to the outbreak of war all across Europe. Once France was defeated, the Vienna Congress met to discuss the future and fate of Europe. The purpose of the Vienna Congress was to establish an international framework for continental cooperation and the maintenance of the balance of power. This aided the emperors of Russia, Austria as well as Prussia to focus on internal state issues instead of warfare among European countries. Internally, these emperors were concerned with the spread of revolutionary ideas, which originated in France and questioned the traditional authority. This research paper…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The U.S. interview, forcing both parties agree to arbitration, it was in Paris and in the end they sad that the territory pretense for the Great Britain
. These acts made by the united states, intervening relate the politic of intervention.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Not only did the the Congress of Vienna accomplish the restoring of Balance of Power, but it also accomplished the end of there being any major European was until 1914. They used Tallyrand as a representative sent by France. The Congress of Vienna was victorius rulers who wanted to contain the change of the French revoltion that was unleashed. They adopted a Priciple of intervention, supposedly this principle had the right to send armies in other countries to restore legitimate monarchs to the thrones. Britain disagreed and suggested that they leave the internal affairs alone.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was fought during 1798-1800. It was between The United States of America, Batavian Republic, and Great Britain against the French Republic and Spain. The war started because the American Legislation was getting a trade deal with Great Britain. The United States at this time was neutral Great Britain and France. The United States refused to repay debt to France, the believed it was owed to the French Crown and not to Republican France.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It showed that with overwhelming militaristic force, and good diplomatic and political leadership, a country could overwhelm and overturn the original alliances and power structures created in 1815 by the Congress of Vienna. This caused unrest in the larger powers of Europe. Around this time, Napoleon III was the ruler in France, and “power-broker” in the continental west. In 1868, a revolution in Spain led to the exile of Catholic Queen Isabella II, and there was a void to fill in Spain. Napoleon III denied the first three candidates, so the regency offered the position of the King of Spain to Leopold Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen, a relative of the Prussian Hohenzollerns, von Bismarck encouraged Leopold to accept the offer. Napoleon III was upset by this, and sent a messenger to Wilhelm I, King of Prussia with terms for this affront. The messenger wouldn’t wait for Wilhelm to come back from his vacation to the Ems spa, and delivered the telegram to him [Wilhelm] there (this was considered extremely rude, and reflected badly on Napoleon III). Wilhelm sent von Bismarck a telegram of the French terms, and von Bismarck doctored the telegram and sharpened the words in his response to the French to, yet again, instigate another country to declare war on Prussia; thus began the Franco-Prussian…

    • 3151 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Ch. 23 - Ideologies and Upheavals 1815-1850 AP European History After studying this chapter, you should be able to: * describe the goals of the leaders of the Congress of Vienna and how the balance of power was reset. * define and describe conservatism, socialism, liberalism, and nationalism. * discuss the factors in the romantic revolt against the age of classicism and the French Revolution. * analyze the lingering remnants of the French Revolution and explain how they exerted influence on political development in the first half of the 19th century. Page 755-759 1. Describe and define the concept “balance of power” in 1814-1815. It refers to an international equilibrium of political and military forces that would discourage aggression by any combination of states or the domination of Europe by any single state. 2. Describe the treatment of France by the victors in 1814. Why wasn’t the treatment harsher? The Great Powers (Austria, Britain, Prussia, Russia) did not want to create a lasting enemy in France by imposing harsh and humiliating peace terms. As a result, treatment was quite lenient, with France given boundaries it possessed in 1792 (larger than those of 1789), the restoration of the Bourbon dynasty (Louis XVIII), no war reparations. The Great Powers did, however, define a strong defensive measures to ensure that France would not again be a forceful aggressor. 3. Who were the participants and what was the purpose of the Holy Alliance and the congress system? Established by Russia Czar Alexander I and made up of Austria, Prussia and Russia in 1815 – it was Alexander’s hope that leaders would rule with Christian virtues. It was, however, yet another instrument that oppressed liberal and revolutionary movements. 4. Describe the makeup of the Austrian Empire. Austria was made up of a plethora of ethnic groups – including the dominant Germans (25% of the population), Magyars (Hungarians), Czechs, Italians, Poles, Ukrainians, Slovenes, Croats, Serbs, and…

    • 2441 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Between 1870 and 1914, European states were locked in a competition within Europe for territorial dominance and control. In the years 1871 to 1914, European diplomacy involved an increasingly precarious balance of power. The politics of geography combined with rising nationalist movements in southern Europe and the Ottoman Empire to create an increasingly confrontationist mood among Europe’s great powers. The European balance of power, so carefully crafted by Bismarck, began to disintegrate with his departure from office in 1890. By 1914, a Europe divided into two camps was no longer the sure guarantee of peace that it had been generation earlier. By 1871, Europe consisted of five great powers, knows as the Big Five; Britain, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia, as well as a number of significant lesser powers, such as Italy. National boundaries appeared fixed, with no great power aspiring to territorial expansion at the expense of its neighbors. But the unification of Italy and Germany had legitimated nationalist aspirations of many European peoples and minorities. The two great unifications had also legitimized the militarism needed to achieve national self determination.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Could the 'Big Three' have done any better, or was the Treaty of Versailles the best that could have been achieved under the circumstances?…

    • 1640 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Great Powers (Britain, Prussia, Austria, Russia, and France) met in Vienna in 1815, they were attempting to establish a lasting peace and a balance of power in Europe. After ten years of revolution in France and sixteen years of Napoleonic Wars the representatives wanted to prevent any more upheaval. One of their solutions was a proposal to restore kings to their thrones ( a concept called "legitimacy") wherever possible, to redraw political boundaries to pre-Napoleonic days, to establish buffer zones around France, and to appoint the Prime Minister of Austria, Metternich, as the keeper of the peace. Despite the agreement of these politicians, however, there were groups of political activists in many countries, inspired by the American and French revolutions, inspired by Enlightenment philosophy, and inspired by the success of Napoleon's nationalist army, who were demanding their own independent nations. These included Hungarians who wanted independence from Austria, Greeks who wanted independence from the Ottoman empire, Germans who wanted to unify and become one country, Italians who wanted unification, and others (in France for example) who wanted to overthrow the monarchy and replace it with a democratic republic. Keeping all these groups under surveillance and control would prove to be more than Metternich could handle.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays