Executive Order 9056 Essay
Did President Roosevelt do that with his Executive Order 9066?
In December 7, 1941 several Japanese planes attacked our Naval Base at Pearl Harbor in the United States Hawaiian territory. This event was devastating not only to the military people’s families who lost their sons or husbands in the naval vessels, but to our nation. Immediate action had to be planned after this declaration of war against the United States. President Roosevelt decided to sign and issue the Executive Order 9066 a couple of weeks after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. This order consisted of removing any American with Japanese decent to be relocated into military areas during World War II. At this point, military people removal from their areas was necessary in order …show more content…
Korematsu indicated that the government was violating the Fifth Amendment which consist that no one should be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. The decision in Korematsu indicates that the executive order actually violated the Bill of Rights which include some of his personal rights. Korematsu refused to leave California when he was asked to move into the military homes because he claimed that he was being deprived of his right to live freely and he indicated that the government should not have permission to make these decisions without a due process of law. The due process law is considered in certain court cases to restrict the amount of control the government has available to exercise over their citizens. Since this due process law clause was in fact found in the court case, Korematsu was arrested not due to the racism, but due to the fear of another incident happening similar to what happen in Pearl Harbor. Since he did not follow the order given by the government he had to suffer the consequences of being arrested. Based on this decision, the Supreme Court enforced the Constitution with its decision they took in Korematsu. This type of temporary segregating Japanese Americans by relocating them in interment camps was ruled constitutional. This case was successful in keeping national security and prevented other attacks to
In December 7, 1941 several Japanese planes attacked our Naval Base at Pearl Harbor in the United States Hawaiian territory. This event was devastating not only to the military people’s families who lost their sons or husbands in the naval vessels, but to our nation. Immediate action had to be planned after this declaration of war against the United States. President Roosevelt decided to sign and issue the Executive Order 9066 a couple of weeks after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor. This order consisted of removing any American with Japanese decent to be relocated into military areas during World War II. At this point, military people removal from their areas was necessary in order …show more content…
Korematsu indicated that the government was violating the Fifth Amendment which consist that no one should be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. The decision in Korematsu indicates that the executive order actually violated the Bill of Rights which include some of his personal rights. Korematsu refused to leave California when he was asked to move into the military homes because he claimed that he was being deprived of his right to live freely and he indicated that the government should not have permission to make these decisions without a due process of law. The due process law is considered in certain court cases to restrict the amount of control the government has available to exercise over their citizens. Since this due process law clause was in fact found in the court case, Korematsu was arrested not due to the racism, but due to the fear of another incident happening similar to what happen in Pearl Harbor. Since he did not follow the order given by the government he had to suffer the consequences of being arrested. Based on this decision, the Supreme Court enforced the Constitution with its decision they took in Korematsu. This type of temporary segregating Japanese Americans by relocating them in interment camps was ruled constitutional. This case was successful in keeping national security and prevented other attacks to