Preview

Examples Of Rene Descartes Claim Of Absolute Certainty

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
887 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Rene Descartes Claim Of Absolute Certainty
Student: Vladyslav Nozdrachov Student number: 14504637

Methodic doubt is a way of searching for the absolute truth by systematically doubting everything. A way to do this is by categorizing ideas and if any part of an idea or argument may be doubted, then the idea is narrowed down to the point where the problem may lie, if it cannot be proven to be certain then the entire idea or argument in that category is eradicated. The point of this, is to break down all knowledge to their core foundations and by doing this ultimately finding an absolute certainty.

Rene Descartes used methodic doubt to attain an absolute certainty and came to a conclusion
“Cogito, ergo sum” meaning ‘I think, therefore I am”. To achieve this he thought up the deceiving demon,
…show more content…
This leads into his mind and body dualism idea where he states that he is able to imagine himself without a body but not his body without a mind, thus continuing into his conceivability argument. The conceivability argument is where you can imagine or conceive something for example a person wearing a pair of shoes, it is also possible to conceive somebody not wearing shoes. In this case if I can include an idea where that person or idea may not need that feature in this example the shoes then that person or idea does not need that feature. And since Descartes doesn’t need to include his body in the idea of himself, therefore he doesn’t need his body, but cannot imagine himself without his mind therefore splitting the two. Descartes states that he is a thinking non-physical thing which is completely different to the body which is a non-thinking physical thing as his mind is a collection of ideas and does not exist as an extension as opposed to his body. The ability to conceive a body without a mind is not an impossible feat and the use of methodic doubt in this case is irrational in a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Chapters 6 And 7 Module 2

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the evil demon conjecture,he brought to question whether a demon wishing to deceive at every…

    • 1747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes has revolutionized the way of philosophy to focus about the nature of being. The two methods in his first work “Discourse on Method” changed philosopher’s focus on the questions of knowing and put aside the questions of being. Method of inquiry advises that you approach questions in an orderly fashion. Also the Method of doubt tells us not to acknowledge anything unless you identify it to be true. Both methods will aid on moving from one truth to another and gain a better understanding of knowledge.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based upon the belief that the mind and body are two separate entities, philosophers, such as Rene Descartes, support the Substance Dualism theory of mind, arguing that the mind, which is a thinking entity, may exist without the body, which is a physical extension, because it is its own individual substance of matter. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he puts all concepts of previous certainty into question, intentionally leaving the reader with skepticism towards the concept of knowledge and mental capacity at large. Further, he continues to contend that the mind is distinctly different than the body and can be innovated due to its ability to think, whereas the body is merely a tangible and measureable dimension with no greater abilities, such as thinking or experiencing emotion. Additionally, Descartes further describes the ideas held by Substance Dualists through detailing that under this theory of mind, all entities are…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes’ arguments for his methods of doubt were things may not be as they seem based on the perception of our senses may be skewed, our dreams may lead us to believe that what we dreamed might be real and that what we know as God may be false or that God may be a demon instead.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Montaigne and Descartes both made use of a philosophical method that focused on the use of doubt to make discoveries about themselves and the world around them. However, they doubted different things. Descartes doubted all his previous knowledge from his senses, while Montaigne doubted that there were any absolute certainties in knowledge. Although they both began their philosophical processes by doubting, Montaigne doubting a constant static self, and Descartes doubted that anything existed at all, Descartes was able to move past that doubt to find one indubitably certainty, "I think, therefore I am".…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Having a belief that all questions have a scientific or mathematical answer; Rene Descartes in his search for solutions used principles that were already known and sets out to establish specific knowledge or truths. One of his most startling revelations is outlined in his writing “Discourse on the Method IV.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that Descartes is even considering the mere question of his own existence just proves that he indeed exists and that is certain. Further, he argues that we are essentially thinking things (res cogitans) that can know our minds clearly and distinctly. Descartes pitches a tent for himself firmly in the rationalist camp, as opposed to the empiricist camp. He constantly emphasizes that the clear and distinct perceptions of the intellect are the only sure means of securing knowledge, and ultimately concludes that the senses are not designed to give us knowledge at all, but are rather meant to help us move through the world in a very practical…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes v Hume

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Meditation I, Descartes reflects on his past beliefs and realizes how so much that he once believed to be true was actually false. To separate what is truth from fiction; Descartes decided to completely reject anything which he can doubt at all. He wrote, “If I am able to find in each some reason to doubt, this will suffice to justify my rejecting the whole” (Descartes 4). The belief that inspired this method was that genuine truth was clear and distinct and that any doubt whatsoever could not provide absolute certainty. In essence, if any component of something was in the very least questionable, then any conclusion drawn from it would be at the most questionable. This method led Descartes to doubt practically everything he once believed, especially knowledge attained through the senses. He wrote, “All that up to the present time I have accepted as most true and…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first doubt that Descartes highlights is that of his senses. He says that all of the information he has received has been through his senses and that sometimes his senses mislead him. Descartes is sure in his existence. To him, this is impossible to doubt and he justifies this…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes states that he is certain that he is a thinking think. All thinking beings have ideas. These ideas must have a starting point, a place that these ideas were formed, that these ideas came from. Descartes then continues to explain that although people can be deceived by their senses and their ideas, why would God allow us to be deceived by our senses? For it is this God that has given us these senses and has given us this Earth. If the existence of God is false, then how do we know if we are truly being deceived? This matter of deception is something that Descartes constantly relates back too. He does this in order to provide a starting point so that he can then use deductive reasoning to reach a conclusion. Descartes claims that the cause of an idea must have at least as much formal reality as the idea has objective reality (formal reality meaning what something actually is and objective reality meaning how that something appears to us using our sense). Descartes explains how he, and us, all have an idea of God in our minds. This idea must have come from somewhere. This he explains using deductive reasoning. We have an idea of God, let A represent this idea, and we can say that the actual God can be represented using B. The idea of God (A) must be caused by something, which is at least as perfect or real as the actual God (B). The…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He also noted that the physical world did not exist, which might imply that he is nonexistence. However, to have these doubts he must exist. For an evil demon to mislead him in all these different ways, he must exist in order to be mislead. Descartes formulates "I am, I exist" or "I Think, therefore I am" but for how long?(Descartes, pg. 82). For as long as I am thinking(Descartes,Pg 82). He goes on to explore what thinking is. A thing that think he says, is one that doubts, affirms, denies etc. Descartes first thought he had a soul, which means he was nourished, moved, could sense and think and also that he had a…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes mentions that several years have passed since he first realized how numerous were the false opinions that he had once taken to be true. He notes that the subsequent opinions built were suspect to doubt because of this. He says that he has gained his knowledge through the senses or through the senses. The senses are sometimes deceptive and it is prudent not to trust that which has deceived us. Descartes hopes to set a solid foundation of true knowledge that cannot be doubted.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes and Hume

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    René Descartes was the first philosopher to introduce the intellectual system known as "radical doubt." According to Descartes, everything he had learned before could have possibly been tainted by society or the senses, therefore he began "…to tear down the edifice of knowledge and rebuild it from the foundations up" (Palmer 157). It was not that everything necessarily had to be false, but physical laws could not offer absolute certainty. Therefore Descartes used reason alone as his tool towards gaining absolute truth; truth being something that one could not possibly doubt. In his conclusion, Descartes found that the only thing that holds absolutely true is his existence. His famous quote, "Cogito ergo sum" can be translated into "I think, therefore I am." By this Descartes implied that when you doubt, someone is doubting, and you cannot doubt that you are. With this revelation, the French philosopher continued to define selfhood as his consciousness. For in Descartes terms, it was plausible to doubt that one has a body, but impossible to doubt the existence of one's mind; therefore "…self and mind must be identical" (Palmer 162).…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes' Meditations

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes’ method of doubt is a method of being skeptical about the truth of beliefs. It aims to find things that cannot be doubted…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    "I think, therefore I am"

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Descartes felt that that the power of thinking or sensing has nothing to do with the physical body. If he could cease all thinking than he could cease to exist. A thing that thinks is "a thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and that also imagines and senses"(Descartes 20). There is a clear separation between the mind and the body. If the body exists, it does not mean the "I" exist. The mind is something that is thinking, indivisible, and non-extended while the body is something that is non-thinking, divisible and extended. He believes in the standard of perfection, which must be separate from his mind because of the imperfection in his thinking.…

    • 559 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays