Preview

Examples Of Nature Vs Nurture Frankenstein

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
196 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Nature Vs Nurture Frankenstein
Nature vs. Nurture: Is mankind inherently good or bad?
In my personal opinion, I think that people are naturally born pure and innocent. In Frankenstein, the creature just wanted to be a part of the community, and when Victor created him, he was eager to learn and he had no fault.
I believe that through our experiences or the way we are raised influences our morals and life-style. For example, because the creature was ugly and scary, humans rejected him and didn’t care to get to understand his intentions, they even threw rocks at him. (p.74)
Because of these experiences, the creature grew hateful and resented humans and his creator because of the way he looked and the things he went through.
I think that people are born without wrong or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    expect a human being to react in one way and a machine or construct in another .…

    • 2936 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nature vs. nurture develops a strong debate in psychology. It is made up of two independent dynamics with different approaches in behavioural changes. The two dynamics is made up of nature and nurture. There are no contentions that McLeod's tries to unravel technical differences between the two dynamics. In the novel frankenstein Nature expresses the external characteristics of human beings that are projected by genetic inheritance. It is difficult to alter changes in some external, internal characteristics that are developed by inheritance of particular genes. Nurture refers to external expressions developed by interaction of different environments and people. It is evident that nurture characteristic can be altered by the people. This is…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From Young Frankenstein, the movie: “Dr. Frederick Frankenstein: For what we are about to see next, we must enter quietly into the realm of genius.” No, I am not really writing from “the realm of genius”.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The creature has a predominantly negative attitude to life as a result of his most frequently encountered example of the behaviour of mankind being that of…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural Born Killer In the gothic novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, Dr. Frankenstein creates life from discarded human body parts. After abandoning the monster because of its ugliness, it goes on a murderous rampage. Dr. Frankenstein abandons the monster justly because he does not owe it because he created it, and his mental state is poor. Frankenstein does not owe the monster solely because he made it.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many beliefs on if man is born evil or if society is corrupts man. The belief that man is born evil is a monstrosity. The belief that man is born good and is corrupted by society though, is not. Two famous philosophers will agree. They are Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke. "Rousseau believed that through a society people become evil"(Mr. Hughes). "Locke believed that everyone was born with a blank slate and that what you experience determines [if] you're good or evil"(John Locke). Man is born good, with a clean slate and society is what corrupts man to evil, through the media, social groups, and peer pressure.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It has always been my personal belief that we are who we are, my internal biology and external culture have shaped me into the person I have become, which I believe is a good honest citizen who loves and cares about people. I also think that most human beings have the chance to be great individuals, however life experiences, biology, culture and other factors can make a person bad or evil.…

    • 260 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Frankenstein is one of the most famous novels of the century and has had many movies created based on this classic tale, yet each version, the book, as well as the three movies, have a lot of differences which make each one very unique. These similarities and differences are not only seen in the characters of Victor Frankenstein and the creation, but also throughout the storyline. So many people today get the impression that Frankenstein is all about a mad man who creates a monster who then goes on a rampage and kills innocent people, but there is so much more to this story that people seem to miss. They miss that it is also a story of equality, trust, facing your fears, and love vs. hate. I had a chance to view all of these movies, along with reading this moving book, and am now going to present the similarities, differences, and morals that stood out to me in all of these.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why do people act the way they do? In the book Frankenstein, the creature is created by using many different dead body parts and then shocked to life. The creature is abandoned because of his intolerable appearance. Put into this world with absolutely no prior knowledge about anything, this deformed creature must learn the ways of life and somehow learn to get by. Denied by every human that he encounters, the creature turns to a life of destruction. Vowing to get revenge on his creator, he begins to murder anyone who is of relation or close to Victor. Why does the creature turn to violence? Is it because of his unusual upbringing? Or is it because of the neglect from every person he encounters?…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that people are born neither inherently good nor evil, but are created as blank slates to be constructed by childhood impressions and other life experiences. In my opinion, the concepts of good and bad are impossible to be natural instinct. Rather, these ideas are mainly formed by the guidance and direction from one’s parents, and also by observation of the environment, and how others handle specific interactions.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychologists have long debated the nature versus nurture issue in the shaping of our identities. Are we shaped by our biology or by our environment? This psychological debate is explored in Mary Shelly’s gothic novel, Frankenstein. The novel poses a simple question: Was Frankenstein’s monster inherently an evil creature, or was he made into a killer because of his environment? Shelly’s characterization of Frankenstein’s monster shows that the creature began as a clean slate, but was shaped into a monster by his experiences and isolation.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, in the case of nature vs. nurture, nurture is what makes humans do evil things. From boys living alone, trying to survive on an island, to grown men thrown into a psychological experiment, their environment is what causes their sadistic/evil behavior. Although it is true that people make the wrong decisions in life, it does not mean that they were born with a desire to do…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One can mimic behaviors viewed by those close to them or influential in their growth while others display behaviors unexplained when never exposed to examples. It is nice to know more about the things inherited by people and the things they learn from others and their surroundings. The creature in Frankenstein didn’t have the ability to do this. In Frankenstein, Mary Shelley shows examples of the nature versus nurture debate by showing how the creature wants acceptance and show that he wasn’t born…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scientists and psychologists have different opinions regarding this. Some scientists see that people are born evil while others believe that people are naturally good. The Christianity concept of the original sin states that people are born with a normal psychological condition which is the desire for doing bad things. On the other hand, according to Islam, people are born upon Fitra. There is much research in the scientific and psychology fields that support the both opinions. Nevertheless, it seems that there is more convincing evidence for the opinion that says people are born good. “Society corrupted man; however, people were born good at birth”. (Cameron, 2013). Being good is one’s nature before getting influenced by the outside sources. We are all born good. However, we might develop tendencies for being evil depending on the surrounding circumstances. We come pure in this life; nevertheless, we learn how to be bad. Throughout the life, we learn and acquire evil and violence. We learn all the amoral qualities. We learn greed, selfishness, Gossiping, hatred, lie, and stinginess. It is impossible to be born with these qualities. There is no way to carry such genes in our blood. Human being is pure. However, society and environment contaminates us…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Humans are the only species that fight and kill among themselves and cause other species to go extinct. Is the state of nature of humans naturally good or bad? This question has been asked in the psychological world many times. Here is my answer: although we humans have a tendency to believe that people are normally good, people are born to be bad. Because people can not have a peaceful condition of living without authority, are not trustworthy of the public, and prioritize their needs over others’ needs (self interest).…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays