Preview

Examples Of Act Utilitarianism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
172 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Act Utilitarianism
Under utilitarianism, there are Act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism which these two have a bit differences. For rule utilitarians, the rightness of a standard is dictated by the measure of good it realizes when taken after. Conversely, act utilitarians judge a demonstration as far as the outcomes of that demonstration alone. Act utilitarianism is a utilitarian theory of ethics which expresses that a man's demonstration is ethically right if and only if the event that creates at any rate as much satisfaction as some other demonstration that the individual could perform around then. For example, you go in to save someone who is choking and they end up suffocated, getting worse. Following Act Utilitarianism going into spare them would not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The essential part of utilitarianism, whether it is Act or Rule, is to promote the greatest overall utility for the given situation. If we look in terms of Utilitarianism, one would be in favor of killing Tom to save the other four children. Even though, Tom would be killed, he would promote overall utility by saving four people through his one body. This reminds me a lot of the Trolley problem we studied in Unit five. They killed one man to save multiple. This may be considered immoral in a way, but according to Act Utilitarianism, the correct choice and the one that promotes overall utility would be to kill Tom and use his body to save the four siblings. In an Act Utilitarian’s mind, they would first think “In what way could I promote the greatest utility for every single person in the situation?” They must then think about the situation. The mother and father could either lose Tom, or they could lose their other four children. The Doctor could either kill Tom and save the four children or let Tom live and watch the others die…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A utilitarian could also use act and rule utilitarianism for the case of throwing the passengers overboard.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism the theory that the right moral act is the one that produces the greatest good for society, emphasizes NOT RULES BUT RESULTS.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarian ethical theories are based on one’s ability to expect the concerns of an deed. Utilitarianism’s creed is that the result of any action takes importance over any type of means, this means that Utilitarianisms objective is to help as many individuals as possible even if it were to negatively disturb people along the way so as long as it helped the general populace. Basically, it’s the ends that matter not necessarily the means.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are obvious problems with both Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Both theories share the common goal of achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest amount of people. However, it is impossible to measure or compare happiness, as one persons happiness may not necessarily be another’s. And how do we measure intangible gain, such as happiness against material gain, such as money? The root principle is a good concept, but it’s the means to which we arrive at the end that cause the problems. In my opinion, there is a greater problem with Act Utilitarianism versus Rule, because it justifies not only ethical but also unethical actions in order to achieve the desired results. It allows for the abuse of people’s rights, demoralizes and devalues the welfare of individuals if it brings enough happiness to the group. The group is nothing more than many individuals coming together to form a whole, and this group would eventually become just a group of demoralized and devalued people who would resort to any means necessary to get what they want because this is what they would be taught to do under the Act theory. This group would raise their children with these same principles, or lack of them, and the cycle would continue, producing a society that was almost egocentric in nature.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism is divided into two: - the rule utilitarianism and act utilitarianism. The rule utilitarian considers the consequences of adopting certain rules whereas the act utilitarian disregards the level of the rules and sticks only to the principle of the utility. Thus the advantage of the rule utilitarianism is that it considers the parameters like justice, beneficence and laws and legal rights which lacks in the act utilitarianism. Kantianism mainly rotates around the following objectives. According to Kant “maxim” is the moral worth of an individual’s action that depends exclusively on the moral acceptability if the rule on which the person acts. Since the maxim applies to every individual that performs the similar act in the similar condition it has been declared as an universal law. The second…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act and Utilitarianism

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess the view that a religious concept of love is the most difficult to put into practice. (20 Marks)…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    act and rule

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout this essay I will be comparing the Act and Rule variations of Utilitarianism to uncover the difference between the two. Utilitarianism is teleological or consequentialist approach to ethics, which argues that something is good or bad according to its benefit for the majority of the people. Jeremy Bentham formalized this theory through his principle of Utility, “the greatest good for the greatest number”. Act Utilitarianism is often linked to Jeremy Bentham’s principle of Utility as it follows the one rule – “the greatest good for the greatest number”. So an individual action is only right if it promotes happiness. Rule utilitarianism argues that moral rules, also based on the principle of Utility, should be kept by everyone in similar circumstances.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act utilitarianism basically says that a persons act is morally right if it produces at least as much happiness as any other act that the person could be preforming at the same time. Somewhat similar to a opportunity cost. Rule utilitarianism, on the other hand, determines the validity of rules of conduct, like moral principles. I think that in the end, however, act and rule utilitarianism viewpoints will disagree with each other. In this case, act utilitarianism would suggest that I should donate the money or give it away to a larger group of people.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shaw and Barry

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Two different forms of utilitarianism are described in our text. The first is called act utilitarianism. According to Shaw and Barry, act utilitarianism states that we must ask ourselves what the consequences of a particular act in a particular situation will be for all those affected (p.60).…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act Utilitarianism is the treatment of each type of moral situation as a unique situation, therefore bring the maximum amount of happiness to everyone that is affected by the act. The agent in these types of situations must determine what is the right things that should be done for this exact situation in present time. The agent must not be bogged down by past experiences, as that will affect the judgment of what to do in this particular situation. While this type of utilitarianism is good in a variety of situation, especially in situations that rarely happen so they require a conclusive determination in judgment, it is hard for people to judge each individual act on an individual basis. It is impractical to have to judge every single action…

    • 2060 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism can be classified in two distinct ways, act and rule. In these ways the utility principle is applied differently. Act-Utilitarianism is concerned with treating each moral situation as unique; therefore, applied the utility principle to each act. The Fundamentals of Ethics states, “Rule-utilitarianism is the version of rule consequentialism that says that well-being is the only thing of intrinsic value” (Shafer-Landau, Russ G-6). This means rule-utilitarianism draws up general rules based on the utility principle. Furthermore, rules are right if they produce greatest happiness for the greatest number.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism as most know view that in order to determining what we should do, we must consider what specific act would produce the best overall consequences. They view the ethical goal is to lead is a life rich in pleasure or happiness both in point of quantity and quality for…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays