The Evolution of Communication
Communications is a field and industry as diverse as it is important. The concept of human communications is one that has been evolving alongside man himself. Early communications involved primitive, shallow exchanges among local people, while today, we are able to communicate across the world in a seemingly infinite number of ways. For all of its complexities, the concept of communication is very simple: relaying a piece of information from one or more humans to others. In this way, the evolution of human communication sheds light onto both the way we as humans communicate and the significance of communications.
From the early days of human civilization, the idea of communications was quite primitive. Cavemen would communicate through basic sounds and gestures, much the way animals communicate (Halualani 23). Accordingly, there was no mass communications, save for the cave paintings found on cave walls centuries later. These early paintings serve as a form of communications by early cave men, elevating their primitive communication methods to lasting symbols that impacted the future of human communication.
A huge step forward in communications was the written word, which came thousands of years ago, when civilizations wanted to record their experiences. Today, methods of written communication include letters, memo, e-mails, newsletters, reports, faxes, books, pamphlets and many others. In communicating through the written word, it is imperative that the audience to which the piece is being written is considered such that it caters to that particular audience. This allows for highest chance of successfully delivering the message or relaying the communication to that audience. If this consideration is overlooked, then the piece of written communication might be completely inaccessible to those who are reading it.
For example, if a letter is being written by the CEO of a company to his employees about a change in...
Cited: Ad-Age staff "The Water cooler" Advertising Age (Midwest region edition) Chicago edition. November 20 2006. < http://0-proquest.umi.com.library.ggu.edu:80/pqdweb? did=1167258041&sid=1&Fmt=3&clientId=2245&RQT=309&VName=PQD>
Alred, G. (2006). Bridging cultures: the academy and the workplace. Journal of Business Communication, 43(2), 79-88.
Fröhlich, B. and Plate, J. 2000. The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands, April 01 - 06, 2000). CHI '00. ACM, New York, NY, 526-531. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/332040.332491.
Halualani, R. T., Mendoza, S. L., & Drzewiecka, J. A. (2009). ‘‘Critical’’ Junctures in Intercultural Communication Studies: A Review. The Review of Communication, 9(1), 17-35.
Keller, Ed and Jon Berry. "Word-of-mouth: The real action is offline", Advertising Age. (Midwest region edition). Chicago: Dec 4, 2006. Vol.77, Iss.49; pg. 20, 1 pgs < http:// 0- proquest.umi.com.library.ggu.edu:80/pqdweb? did=1174959211&sid=1&Fmt=3&clientId=2245&RQT=309&VName=PQD>
Please join StudyMode to read the full document