Preview

evidence law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2224 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
evidence law
According to the Evidence Act Cap 6, evidence denotes the means by which any alleged matter or facts the truth of which is submitted to investigations, approved or disapproved, admissions, presumption of law and observations by courts in the judicial capacity as per section 2[1]d of the act.
Rules of evidence refer to the procedure of admitting relevant facts by courts of law and in general they are referred to as Relevancy and Admissibility of Evidence According to section 4, it may be given from any suit or proceedings of the existence or non existence of every fact in issue and of such other facts as may be declared admissible and relevant as was considered in the case of Uganda v David Kamugisha1, where an application was made by the defense counsel to tender in a letter purportedly written by a witness. The witness however denied knowing how to read and write or even being a girl friend to the accused. The issue was whether this letter was admissible in evidence. It was held that admissibility of any piece of evidence depends on whether it was relevant to the fact in issue before court and whether it was in line with the fact in issue.
Another case of Struggle Uganda Limited v Pan African Insurance Company Limited2 , where plaintiff gave evidence and before it that the defendant company did not exist of which the defendants objected on grounds that it was not in line with the case before court. The issue was whether the company owned the suit premises or not. It was held that the existence of the company was not the fact in issue as it was not pleaded for in the plaint.
It is also argued that once the evidence is admissible its manner of obtaining it does not matter. In the case of Kirume v R3 , where a police officer went to accused’s premises to mount a search without warrant, and discovered some incriminating items which the prosecution sought to tender in it and accused objected to it arguing that it was obtained illegally. Privy Council held that the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law Case 3-3

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should a party to a lawsuit have to hand over its confidential business secrets as part of a discovery request? Why or why not? What limitations might a court consider imposing before requiring ATC to produce this material?…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Evidence builds the basis of any criminal trial. The judge regulates the evidence that is introduced into court. Evidence can be deemed inadmissible if it was illegally obtained under the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), for example, police forcefully acquired the confession out of the suspect. Most evidence is in the form of oral statements – witnesses that are competent, compellable and non-privileged are called to testify. There are many issues regarding the reliability of evidence. Most trials take place a few months after the crime and witnesses are asked to recall information after this substantial amount of time. The witnesses may not remember all the information correctly or forgetting details as to what had occurred.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "All relevant evidence is admissible, except as otherwise provided." The goal of this rule is to allow parties to present all of the evidence that bears on the issue to be decided, and to keep out all evidence that is immaterial or that lacks Probative value. Evidence that is offered to help prove something that is not at issue is immaterial. For example, the fact that a defendant attends church every week is immaterial, and thus irrelevant, to a charge of running a red light. Probative value is a tendency to make the existence of any material fact more or less probable. For instance, evidence that a murder defendant ate spaghetti on the day of the murder would normally be irrelevant because people who eat spaghetti are not more or less likely to commit murder, as compared with other people. However, if spaghetti sauce were found at the murder scene, the fact that the defendant ate spaghetti that day would have probative value and thus would be relevant evidence…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Rules of Evidence

    • 3961 Words
    • 16 Pages

    The cross-examiner may always inquire into these four areas without having any basis whatever for believing that there is any infirmity in the witness's testimony. For example, one could ask a witness…

    • 3961 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence is a type of proof. It is usually used to prove someone innocent or guilty. There are many different types of evidence, such as: testimony, direct, circumstantial, and physical evidence. However, according to the article “Forensic: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, forensic evidence is the best evidence to present at a court case or trial.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IS4670 Unit 2 Lab 1

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page

    2) Information received from others that cannot adequately substantiate. In the case of computer evidence, if an email was sent from my email account linking me to a crime, it is hearsay because there is no way to prove that I wrote it.…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Federal Rules of Evidence

    • 3383 Words
    • 14 Pages

    As stated by Thayer J., (1889)“Evidence is any matter of fact which is furnished to a legal tribunal, otherwise than by reasoning or a reference to what is noticed without proof, as the basis of inference in ascertaining some other matter of fact.” Admissible evidence is relevant. Testimony that is direct personal knowledge or observation and that if true proves a fact without inference or presumption. Documentary evidence (e.g., a written contract, a deed) must be authenticated before the evidence is admissible unless, there is no question on the authenticity or the originals are lost, destroyed or made unattainable. Secondary evidence should be notarized to offer authenticity of the original document if needed. Tangible evidence is physical evidence that is either real (e.g. a murder weapon) or demonstrative (e.g. showing the type of motion used when striking a victim), or illustrative (e.g. models or charts).…

    • 3383 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Evidence Collection Policy

    • 2535 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Whoever conducts the investigation does so in a previously mandated, official, and legally recognized manner.…

    • 2535 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Evidence

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence is the key element in determining the guilt or innocence of those accused of crimes against society in a criminal court of law. Evidence can come in the form of weapons, documents, pictures, tape recordings and DNA. According to the American Heritage College dictionary, evidence is the documentary or oral statements and the material objects admissible as testimony in a court of law (476). It is shown in court as an item of proof, to impeach or rehabilitate a witness, and to determine a sentence. This paper will examine two murder cases, O.J. Simpson and Daniel Taylor.…

    • 1321 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stages of a Criminal Trial

    • 2709 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Types of Evidence Evidence can be either direct or circumstantial. Direct evidence believed, proves a fact without requiring the judge or jury to draw inferences. For example, direct evidence may consist of the information contained in a photograph or a videotape. It might also consist of testimonial evidence provided by a witness on the stand. A straight forward statement by a witness (“I saw him do it!”) is a form of direct evidence.…

    • 2709 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discretion within the criminal trial process is a very important matter, as the judge or magistrate must exercise appropriate measures in order to reach a just verdict. For example the evidence presented in trial must be approved by the Judge or Magistrate in case the evidence used in court appears inadmissible or prejudicial. The Evidence Act 1995 applies court discretion within the trial process as it allows for the quality of fairness. Without the exercise of impartiality within the trial process the decision made by the jury may alter the final…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nix V. Williams Summary

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evidence that is obtained through unlawful police conduct that would have been discovered inevitably during the course of an investigation does not have to be excluded from trial…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both circumstantial and direct evidence are acceptable to prove or disprove the elements of a charge necessary to a conviction.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evidence In A Guilty Case

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After watching the video, I have to say that I am disappointed with the prosecution team. Naturally there are many cases when new evidence would come in after a case would be done and that would take things in a whole new direction and maybe give the guilty party a chance to prove themselves innocent. Thats fair and understandable since the new evidence that came in proves that the person didn’t do the crime. Evidence is always helpful in a trial and both the defense and the prosecution will use it to their advantage as best as they can. But the evidence needs to be actual prove instead of something circumstantial. The defense and prosecution can’t just launch a trail with nothing but theories in for example a murder case. The prosecution can say that a man killed his wife.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays