Evaluation Model For Criminal Justice

In this paper, the program model for criminal justice the will be used is that of monitoring and evaluation. Evaluation of Program can be described as a process of defining, collecting and availing information that is utilized in describing and comprehending a program, and making rulings and choices linked to the program. Evaluation gives information regarding the outcomes and functions of a program. Additionally, these evaluations should avail an analysis of the nature in which this program functions together with description concerning the actual clients. The human and physical resources plus the process of interventions that are utilized in the implementation of the program should also be defined. Evaluation is able to pinpoint the fundamental
The determiner of this is the end users of the information and the intended purpose for information use. Program evaluation can be summarised as a process which encompasses making choice of the kind of information to collect, gathering the said information, availing the information to end users, stakeholders and enabling the utilization of the information by policymakers (Lovins & Latessa, 2018).
During the period of evaluation of a criminal justice, many categories can be used to evaluate a criminal justice policy and its effectiveness. Making a decision regarding the most appropriate evaluation model to use on many occasions is challenging because every model can give varying outcomes. Each model provides a solution to various kinds of questions concerning policy. Nonetheless, process evaluation can be described as being extremely relevance and applicable to criminal justice in the current period (Lovins & Latessa,
At the period of evaluation the objectives and goals are values which can be measured, denoting that they have realistic and specific information collected at monitoring phase. Formal evaluation process in criminal justice is important since efficiency and effectiveness of results regarding policies are described by program documents, legislation, policy formulators, and policy stakeholders plus defined goals and objectives set out by the administrators of policy (Cole et al., 2018). After the implementation of the policy, the next step is undergoing a formative evaluation and summative