Evaluating a Wesite

Topics: Website, Patient, Nursing Pages: 3 (1229 words) Published: October 31, 2014

Evaluating a Website for Credibility: Mayo Clinic
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR500: Foundational Concepts and Applications
Summer 2014

Evaluating a Website for Credibility: Mayo Clinic
In this paper, I have chosen a health-related website and evaluated its credibility. The search engine used to locate the domain, mayoclinic.org, was Google. The specific web address is http://mayoclinic.org. Mayo Clinic is a healthcare organization centered on patient care. It offers locations in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. Mayoclinic.org is a website based from the organization, Mayo Clinic, which offers a wealth of health-related information on medicine, occupational health, health promotion, and disease management. The purpose of mayoclinic.org is to educate and provide medical resources to the general public over the age of eighteen years old and medical professionals through different types of literature and retail avenues. It also offers convenient services to patients and potential patients of Mayo Clinic, such as scheduling appointments and contact information for various departments within the organization (Mayo Clinic, 2014). As a nurse, I am always looking for reliable websites that I can send my patients to collect health information. The Mayo Clinic is very popular in the healthcare world. Therefore, the credibility of mayoclinic.org was evaluated using the criteria: authority, information, objectivity, ease of navigation, and privacy and security policies (Chamberlain College of Nursing [CCN], 2014). Evaluation Criteria

Authority
The authority of a website refers to the qualifications of the author or authors of the site (CCN, 2014). The credentials of the author(s) and/or editor(s) should be examined (Orlowski, Oermann, & Shaw-Kokot, 2013). On the site, mayoclinic.org, the information that is placed on the website pages come from a plethora of medical editors. The editing staff consists of: a medical director, senior medical editors, a...

References: Anderson, A., & Klemm, P. (2008). The Internet: Friend or foe when providing patient education? Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 12(1), pp. 55–63. doi:10.1188/08.CJON.55-63
Chamberlain College of Nursing. (2014). NR500 Foundational Concepts and Applications: Week 2 lesson. [Lecture notes]. St. Louis, MO: online publication.
Mayo Clinic (2014). Retrieved from http://mayoclinic.org on July, 14, 15, 16, 2014.
Orlowski, J. L., Oermann, M. H., & Shaw-Kokot, J. (2013). Evaluation of heart failure websites for patient education. Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal, 35(3), pp. 240-246. doi:10.1097/TME.0b013e318296469b
Roberts, L. (2010). Health information and the internet: The 5 Cs website evaluation tool. British Journal of Nursing, 19(5), pp. 322-325.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • WolfeC Evaluating website NR500 Essay
  • Essay about Evaluating
  • Evaluating Essay
  • Essay about Evaluating Cms.Gov Website for Credibility
  • Essay about Evaluating Website
  • Evaluating Teaching Essay
  • Evaluating Websites Essay
  • evaluating a claim Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free